Public Health NOT Public Harm

Public Health NOT Public Harm
Gail Y. Davidson LL.B., Dr. Matthew Cockle, Dr. Steven Pelech

The threat of COVID-19 has passed. But the threat of COVID-19 policy remains for the thousands of healthcare workers terminated as a result of their decision to refuse the COVID-19 genetic vaccines. And the threat of COVID-19 policy also remains for all British Columbians who wish to preserve our essential right to informed consent, and our essential freedom to refuse both unwanted medical interventions and non-consensual experimentation. To be perfectly clear, COVID-19 restrictions are not over in BC—not by a long-shot. On the contrary, the temporary restrictions brought in ostensibly to deal with COVID-19 are now formalized. In other words, these emergency measures, which flagrantly violated the rights and freedoms of British Columbians, have been written into BC law on a permanent basis.

Unvaccinated BC Healthcare workers have been stripped of their right to employment since October 2021. Hailed as heroes the year before, thousands of vitally important healthcare professionals have been fired, with nearly half of these in the Interior and Northern Health regions. Rural hospitals throughout BC are unable to operate their emergency departments due to staffing shortages. And just as the province is experiencing a healthcare crisis—fuelled by this staffing shortage—continuing COVID-19 restrictions are forcing highly trained and experienced health care workers to leave BC for work in other provinces or take early retirement

BC’s Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry has issued a series of catastrophically harmful and apparently unlawful public health orders. The most recent of these, released on April 6, 2023, mandates COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of employment for healthcare workers and as a condition of enrollment in training for healthcare professions. When rights restrictions are imposed upon a population in the context of a public emergency, there is a legal requirement that the restrictions be necessary, legitimate, proportionate, and temporary. To begin with, this public health order is utterly unjustified, because there is no COVID-19 emergency in BC. Even worse—showing a blatant disregard for the law—this particular order is not only unnecessary, illegitimate, and disproportionate, but it has no termination date.

When we examine this order, we see that the Public Health Officer has formally terminated all of BC’s unvaccinated healthcare workers, even those who practice alternative medicines such as acupuncture, homeopathy, naturopathy and chiropractic medicine, to list a few. There is essentially no recourse for these healthcare professionals and support workers. Stripped of income, not eligible for unemployment insurance, and not eligible for legal aid, our terminated healthcare workers have no means to effectively challenge the lawfulness of this order.

The order, Issued by Bonnie Henry on April 6, 2023, should be terminated immediately. Furthermore, those deprived of employment by the order should be reinstated and receive fair compensation for loss of income and other consequential damages. There is no justification whatsoever for a vaccination, or a vaccination status requirement for healthcare workers. Even the World Health Organization has announced, on May 5, 2023, that COVID-19 no longer constitutes a pandemic. Public health orders that coerce individuals to accept a medical treatment not voluntarily chosen can arguably never be considered lawful, even in a state of public health emergency. Orders, such as that of April 6, 2023, that use the coercion of job loss to compel involuntary submission to injection with a pharmaceutical product that is either ineffective, unsafe or properly considered experimental, are always unlawful and prohibited by both Canadian and international law during normal and emergency times.

In addition to blatant disregard for the law, the public health order of April 6 ignores established scientific facts. The order fails to acknowledge that COVID-19 genetic vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of disease. The last date that the BC Centre for Disease Control released data linking COVID-19 vaccine status to hospitalizations and deaths was on June 23, 2022. During the period of January 2 to June 18, 2022, some 74% of British Columbians who were hospitalized and 81% of those who died with COVID-19 were double or triple vaccinated.

The April 6 order completely ignores the proven effectiveness of natural immunity. This is indefensible. One would expect levels of natural immunity to be very high in these healthcare workers in view of their increased exposure to COVID-19 patients during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. The vast majority of people in BC have now acquired both natural and vaccine-induced immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Unvaccinated health care workers simply do not pose a greater risk to patients than their vaccinated colleagues.

The April 6 public health order also ignores mounting evidence available in government vaccine injury reporting systems such as VAERS in the US, EudraVigilence in Europe and the World Health Organization’s VigiAccess databases. These databases show more vaccine injuries, hospitalizations, and deaths from the COVID-19 genetic vaccines than from the 80 other vaccines combined over the past 30 years. The risks of these injuries has been well documented to be unacceptably high for a vaccine given to healthy adults. For example, published data from the BC Centre for Disease Control shows a risk for symptomatic myocarditis or perimyocarditis in about 1 in 1900 males aged 18 to 29 years after the second inoculation with the Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Mandating COVID-19 vaccination puts the health of healthcare providers at risk, and endangers the health of all people in our province.

The April 6 order also prohibits unvaccinated and non-disclosing students, faculty, and staff, in post secondary institutions, from any work in healthcare settings. The order thereby prevents unvaccinated students from completing training in the health care professions and other occupations. This is particularly egregious given that there is no factual basis for assuming that unvaccinated students pose any COVID-19-related risk to those in health care facilities. Furthermore, by barring admission to healthcare premises, this order also effectively prevents unvaccinated and non-disclosing staff and faculty from remaining employed. 

The April 6 order bans already certified and desperately needed health care workers from employment. It thereby further reduces timely access to competent health care in BC even as patients suffer life-threatening health care delays because of short staffing. And for those who are not yet aware, BC is indeed facing a health care crisis. More than 35 emergency room physicians in Surrey have warned BC authorities that patients are going without timely care and even dying due to a shortage of staff, acute care beds and adequate hospital accommodation.

With the second worst wait times for cancer patients in all of Canada, BC’s provincial government has announced that starting May 29, 2023, the province will pay to send patients currently awaiting radiation therapy in BC to the US for treatment. The financial costs for this program will be enormous. Additionally, it will place increased stress upon patients with an attendant decrease in positive outcomes. At the same time, patients unable to travel for treatment will be faced with increased risk of death due to further treatment delay. In a particularly sad twist of irony—considering both the terrible cost of cross border radiation treatment and the groundless prohibition of employment for unvaccinated healthcare workers in BC—vaccination is no longer required for healthcare workers in Washington state!

By limiting the pool of trained health care workers allowed to serve the critical needs of cancer patients—even as BC cancer treatment centres are being plagued by staff burnout—the April 6 order compounds the problems that BC’s healthcare system is facing. It requires no great flight of the imagination to see that this public health order will inevitably lead to enormous harm for the people of British Columbia—particularly those in need of urgent care.

Apart from Nova Scotia and BC, none of the other provinces require mandatory COVID-19 vaccination of healthcare workers at this time. In contrast to BC, public health authorities in many other countries, including Australia, Denmark, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom, no longer even recommend COVID-19 vaccinations for healthy adults and children. It is time for the BC Ministry of Health to acknowledge what has become plainly obvious to health authorities elsewhere—COVID-19 is no longer considered a threat, and the harms of these genetic vaccines outweigh their benefits. Healthcare workers should not be coerced into submitting to mandatory COVID-19 vaccination their training and experience does not support.

“The April 6, 2023 Public Health Order must be terminated immediately. Our healthcare workers must be reinstated with compensation. Unlawful orders, such as this, must never again be imposed upon the people of British Columbia. Those responsible must be held accountable.”

The April 6, 2023 Public Health Order must be terminated immediately. Our healthcare workers must be reinstated with compensation. Unlawful orders, such as this, must never again be imposed upon the people of British Columbia. Those responsible must be held accountable.


Policy Announcement on Radical Gender Ideology from PPC Leader Maxime Bernier

Policy Announcement on Radical Gender Ideology
Maxime Bernier – Press Conference – Winkler, May 23, 2023

With the active support of the woke far left and all establishment parties, including Pierre Poilievre and the fake Conservatives, radical trans activists are trying to destroy one of the key building blocks of a healthy society – the distinction between men and women. This evil agenda, which contradicts basic biological realities, is particularly harmful to women and children.

In recent years, cultural Marxists and radical activists in the media, government, and schools have made every effort to normalize toxic transgender ideology. They teach children that stereotypes determine their gender, and if they do not fit into the traditional male or female gender roles, they encourage them to think they were born in the wrong body.

Children are never born in the wrong body. Children should be taught to accept themselves, not seek solutions through pharmaceuticals and medical procedures.
Chris Elston, better known as Billboard Chris, is a father and activist trying to raise awareness about the danger of gender ideology. As he likes to say: “There’s only two sexes, zero genders, and infinite personalities. Just because a little girl plays in the dirt, or enjoys sports, does not mean she’s a boy. She’s a beautiful young girl. There is no such thing as a ‘transgender child’”.

Most boys and girls suffering from gender dysphoria simply grow out of it. Many suffer from other mental issues, such as autism, or are under the temporary influence of a phenomenon of social contagion.

Bill C-4, which was unanimously adopted by all parties in the House of Commons in 2021, including the fake Conservatives, criminalizes parents and therapists who try to help minors with gender dysphoria accept who they are. In effect, the law bans “conversion therapy” in one direction, but allows it in the other. It is illegal to treat children for a mental disorder, but it is legal to encourage them to undergo “gender affirming therapy” and mutilate their bodies.

Taking puberty blockers at a young age will transform their body and sterilize them for life, when they are too young to evaluate the impact of such a momentous decision. Sex change surgeries cause many complications and require lifelong treatments. More and more trans people who underwent such surgeries regret it later in life and want to “detransition”, but it’s tragically too late.

Cultural fads like Drag Queen Story Hours promote this ideology among children and make it appear normal to identify as the other sex or as different invented genders.
Last week, I met parents who are trying to get books removed from school libraries that promote gender ideology and contain inappropriate pornographic images. There is actually an article in the Criminal Code that says it’s illegal to make such images available to minors. Why is it not enforced? I will also attend a board of trustees meeting in Brandon this evening with concerned parents, where this issue will be discussed.

Women’s rights and security are being trampled to accommodate men pretending to be the other sex. As a result, women are encountering men in changing rooms and bathrooms. Violent male criminals are being incarcerated in women’s prisons. The transfer to women’s prisons of male inmates who self-identify as women has been standard practice in Canada since it was introduced by the Trudeau government in 2018. It has resulted in male criminals with histories of sexual abuse being housed alongside female inmates, with several cases of violent behaviour being reported in the media.

There is a particularly horrific case in British Columbia involving a man, Adam Laboucan, who raped a three-month-old boy when he was 15 years old. He drowned a 3-year old boy. He became Canada’s youngest violent sex offender when he was sentenced to prison at 17 years old. After he started identifying as a woman and changed his name to Tara Desousa, he was transferred to the Fraser Valley Institution for Women in Abbotsford. This is a minimum security prison with a Mother-Child Program.

It’s unbelievable that this can happen in our society today. Instead of protecting our most vulnerable, Justin Trudeau’s insane woke policies put women and children at risk, while accommodating violent rapists who pretend to be the other sex. Pierre Poilievre’s fake Conservatives have nothing to say – they even signal to trans activists that they want their support!

Women also have to compete unfairly with biological men in sports. A few weeks ago, for example, a bearded pro powerlifter, who has decided he is actually a woman, entered a women’s competition in Lethbridge. He smashed a record held by another so-called transgender powerlifter who was watching on. I’m not joking! Canada in 2023 is stranger than fiction! This is not only totally unfair for the real women participating in these competitions. It’s absurd. It’s ridiculous. It’s an insult to our intelligence.

Gender ideology is even transforming our language. Bill C-16, adopted by the Liberal government in 2016 and famously opposed by Jordan Peterson, recognized gender self-identification and opened the door to compelled speech. Since then, businesses and government agencies have banned the use of words like “woman” and “mother” in favour of “menstruating people” and “birthing people”.

While adults can make whatever choices they want regarding their sex and gender identification, Canadians who believe there are only two immutable sexes and genders must not be compelled to adapt their language and behaviour to accommodate woke gender ideology.

The normalization of radical gender ideology will have a catastrophic impact on women and children if we do not reverse course soon. That is why I am releasing this official PPC policy today. The People’s Party is the only party taking this issue seriously. None of the establishment parties, including the fake Conservatives, have anything to say about it. On the contrary, they support these disastrous policies and trends.

It is completely unacceptable that not a single elected MP is brave enough to stand up for women and children, and basic biological realities! I have been speaking out against this madness for many years already, and I will continue to speak out against it in Parliament once I am elected MP for Portage-Lisgar.

First, a PPC government will modify the Criminal Code to outlaw the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and any form of bodily mutilation on minors with the goal of “transitioning” to another sex. Moreover, any person encouraging minors to “transition” will be held criminally responsible for attempting to cause harm.

We will remove the ban imposed by Bill C-4, the so-called “conversion therapy bill”, that is preventing parents and counsellors from helping minors who suffer from gender dysphoria accept their body.

We will strictly enforce section 163.1(1)(b) of the Criminal Code in order to remove inappropriate pornographic content from schools and libraries.

We will protect women’s spaces – bathrooms, changing rooms, shelters, and prisons – from intrusion by biological men.

We will maintain separate competitions for women in which biological men cannot participate in sports regulated and funded by the federal government.

We will abolish federal programs that fund sex change operations for civil servants and prisoners.

And finally, a PPC government will repeal Bill C-16, the bill that added gender self-identification as ground for protection against discrimination.

Most people living in this riding support these policies. They have a choice on June 19: They can support a fake Conservative who, like the rest of his party, will say and do nothing; or to elect someone who is not afraid to speak up against radical gender ideology and to fight to protect women and children. Thank you.


People’s Party of Canada
Follow the PPC on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Rumble, Odysee, Gab, and Telegram. Follow Max on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Rumble, Gettr, and Telegram.
To make a donation with a cheque, please use this address: Suite 700, 1 Nicholas St, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 7B7. The cheque must be made payable to People’s Party of Canada. To make an online donation, please visit our website: Thank you!

Tyranny at Nuremberg by Paul Craig Roberts

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Given the controversy ever present these days on the net when it comes to the issue of the Nuremberg trials and the subsequent Nuremberg Code so many people on line tend to employee when talking about governments and their growing tendency to becoming more and more authoritarian (Canada’s federal Liberal government under PM Justin Trudeau is one of the more blatant examples) it’s necessary for me to provide readers with a short bio on journalist Paul Craig Roberts.

Considering the amount of misinformation surrounding the trial of the 21 German military personal and related persons Paul’s article is necessary reading for anyone seriously interested in knowing the truth about this grandiose, Victor orchestrated travesty of justice; one on par with Stalin’s showtrials in the Soviet Union during the 1930’s and 40’s.

Any [Censored-Ed.] is due to legal restrictions on my ability to post certain words.

The following bio is from Paul Craig Roberts’ website:

“Dr. Paul Craig Roberts: Paul Craig Roberts is one of the most respected columnists in the alternative media. His syndicated articles can be seen on many leading alternative news websites including Lew Rockwell, Infowars, Counterpunch, InformationClearingHouse and countless others. Roberts scores huge points in the credibility department having been the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury under Reagan, and an editor of the Wall Street Journal — among a long list of other accolades. His research is impeccable and his vision of how the world really operates is second to none. He knows why and when the global chess pieces are moving, and has the incredible talent to communicate difficult concepts to the general public. He has written several books including The Tyranny of Good Intentions and How the Economy was Lost. His many interviews can be seen on Russia Today and Prison Planet TV. Roberts is also a recent contributor to Gerald Celente’s esteemed Trends Journal. There is no one better at reporting the reality of geo-political events and the workings of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve.]

Tyranny at Nuremberg

August 11, 2017

The showtrial of a somewhat arbitrarily selected group of 21 surviving Nazis at Nuremberg during 1945-46 was US Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson’s show. Jackson was the chief prosecutor. As a long-time admirer of Jackson, I always assumed that he did a good job.

My admiration for Jackson stems from his defense of law as a shield of the people rather than a weapon in the hands of government, and from his defense of the legal principle known as mens rea, that is, that crime requires intent. I often cite Jackson for his defense of these legal principles that are the very foundation of liberty. Indeed, I cited Jackson in my recent July 31 column. His defense of law as a check on government power plays a central role in the book that I wrote with Lawrence Stratton, The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

In 1940 Jackson was US Attorney General. He addressed federal prosecutors and warned them against “picking the man and then putting investigators to work, to pin some offense on him. It is in this realm—in which the prosecutor picks some person whom he dislikes or desires to embarrass, or selects some group of unpopular persons and then looks for an offense—that the greatest danger of abuse of prosecuting power lies. It is here that law enforcement becomes personal, and the real crime becomes that of being unpopular with the predominant or governing group, being attached to the wrong political views or being personally obnoxious to, or in the way of, the prosecutor himself.”

Later as a Supreme Court justice Jackson overturned a lower court conviction of a person who had no idea, or any reason to believe, that he had committed a crime.

Having just finished reading David Irving’s book Nuremberg (1996), I am devastated to learn that in his pursuit of another principle, at Nuremberg Jackson violated all of the legal principles for which I have so long admired him. To be clear, at Nuremberg Jackson was in pursuit of Nazis, but their conviction was the means to his end—the establishment of the international legal principle that the initiation of war, the commitment of military aggression, was a crime.

The problem, of course, was that at Nuremberg people were tried on the basis of ex post facto law—law that did not exist at the time of their actions for which they were convicted.

Moreover, the sentence—death by hanging—was decided prior to the trial and prior to the selection of defendants.

Moreover, the defendants were chosen and then a case was made against them.

Exculpatory evidence was withheld. Charges on which defendants were convicted turned out to be untrue.

The trials were so loaded in favor of the prosecution that defense was pro forma.

The defendants were abused and some were tortured.

The defendants were encouraged to give false witness against one another, which for the most part the defendants refused to do, with Albert Speer being the willing one. His reward was a prison sentence rather than death.

The defendants’ wives and children were arrested and imprisoned. To Jackson’s credit, this infuriated him.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, General Eisenhower, and Winston Churchill thought that surviving Nazis should be shot without trial. Roosevelt laughed about liquidating 50,000 German military officers. Eisenhower told Lord Halifax that Nazi leaders should be shot while trying to escape, the common euphemism for murder. Russians spoke of castrating German men and breeding German women to annihilate the German race. US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau wanted to reduce Germany to an agrarian society and send able-bodied Germans to Africa as slaves to work on “some big TVA project.”

Robert Jackson saw in these intentions not only rank criminality among the allied leadership but also a missed opportunity to create the legal principle that would criminalize war, thus removing the disaster of war from future history. Jackson’s end was admirable, but the means required bypassing Anglo-American legal principles.

Jackson got his chance, perhaps because Joseph Stalin vetoed execution without trial. First a showtrial, Stalin said, to demonstrate their guilt so that we do not make martyrs out of Nazis.

Whom to select for the list of 21-22 persons to be charged? Well, whom did the allies have in custody? Not all those they desired. They had Reichsmarschall Herman Göring who headed the air force. Whatever the valid charges against Göring, they were not considered to be mitigated by the fact that under Göring the German air force was mainly used against enemy formations on the battleground and not, like the US and British air forces in saturation terror bombing of civilian cities, such as Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, or by the fact that in Hitler’s final days Hitler removed Göring from all his positions, expelled him from the party, and ordered his arrest.

The Nuremberg trials are paradoxical in that the law Jackson intended to establish applied to every country, not to Germany alone. The ex post facto law under which Germans were sentenced to death and to prison also criminalized the terror bombing of German and Japanese cities by the British and US air forces. Yet, the law was only applied to the Germans in the dock. In his book, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden (1995), Irving quotes US General George C. McDonald’s dissent from the directive to bomb civilian cities such as Dresden. Gen. McDonald characterized the directive as the “extermination of populations and the razing of cities,” war crimes under the Nuremberg standard.

They had foreign minister Ribbentrop. They had field marshals Keitel and Jodl and the grand-admirals Raeder and Dönitz. They had a German banker, who was saved from sentencing by the intervention of the Bank of England. They had a journalist. They had Rudolf Hess who had been in a British prison since 1941 when he went to Britain on a peace mission to end the war. They wanted an industrialist, but Krupp was too old and ill. He was devoid of the persona of a foreboding evil. You can read the list in Irving’s book.

Göring knew from the beginning that the trial was a hoax and that his death sentence had already been decided. He had the means (a poison capsule) throughout his imprisonment to commit suicide, thus depriving his captors of their planned humiliation of him. Instead, he held the Germans together, and they stood their ground. Possessed of a high IQ, time and again he made fools of his captors. He made such a fool of Robert Jackson during his trial that the entire court burst out in laughter. Jackson never lived down being bested in the courtroom by Göring.

And Göring wasn’t through with making his captors look foolish and incompetent. He, the field marshalls and grand admiral requested that they be given a military execution by firing squad, but the pettiness of the Tribunal wanted them hung like dogs. Göring told his captors that he would allow them to shoot him, but not hang him, and a few minutes before he was to be marched to the gallows before the assembled press and cameras he took the poison capsule, throwing the execution propaganda show into chaos. To this injury he added insult leaving the prison commandant, US Col. Andrus a note telling him that he had had 3 capsules. One he had left for the Americans to find, thus causing them to think his means of escaping them had been removed. One he had taken minutes prior to his show execution, and he described where to find the third. He had easily defeated the continuous and thorough inspections inflicted upon him from fear that he would commit suicide and escape their intended propaganda use of his execution.

There was a time in Anglo-American law when the improprieties of the Nuremberg trials would have resulted in the cases being thrown out of court and the defendants freed. Even under the ex post facto law and extra-judicial, extra-legal terms under which the defendants were tried, at least two of the condemned deserved to be cleared.

It is not clear why Admiral Dönitz was sentenced to 10 years in prison. The chief American judge of the Tribunal, Francis Biddle, said: “It is, in my opinion, offensive to our concept of justice to punish a man for doing exactly what one has done himself.” “The Germans,” Biddle said, “fought a much cleaner war at sea than we did.“

Jodl, who countermanded many Nazi orders, was sentenced to death. The injustice of the sentence was made clear by a German court in 1953 which cleared Jodl of all Nuremberg charges and rehabilitated him posthumously. The French justice at the Nuremberg Tribunal said at the time that Jodl’s conviction was without merit and was a miscarriage of justice.

The entire Nuremberg proceeding stinks to high heaven.

~ Paul Craig Roberts

The entire Nuremberg proceeding stinks to high heaven. Defendants were charged with aggression for the German invasion of Norway. The fact was kept out of the trial that the British were about to invade Norway themselves and that the Germans, being more efficient, learned of it and managed to invade first.

Defendants were accused of using slave labor, paradoxical in view of the Soviets own practice. Moreover, while the trials were in process the Soviets were apparently gathering up able-bodied Germans to serve as slave labor to rebuild their war-torn economy.

Defendants were accused of mass executions despite the fact that the Russians, who were part of the prosecution and judgment of the defendants, had executed 15,000 or 20,000 Polish officers and buried them in a mass grave. Indeed, the Russians insisted on blaming the Germans on trial for the Katyn Forest Massacre.

Defendants were accused of aggression against Poland, and Ribbentrop was not permitted to mention in his defense the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact that divided Poland between Germany and the Soviet Union, without which Germany could not have attacked Poland. The fact that the Soviets, who were sitting at Nuremberg in judgment on the Germans, had themselves invaded Poland was kept out of the proceedings.

Moreover, without the gratuitous British “guarantee” to Poland, the Polish military dictatorship would likely have agreed to return territories stripped from Germany by the Versailles Treaty and the invasion would have been avoided.

“The greatest hypocrisy was the charge of aggression against Germany when the fact of the matter is that World War 2 began when the British and French declared war on Germany. Germany conquered France and drove the British from the European Continent after the British and French started the war with a declaration of war against Germany.”

The greatest hypocrisy was the charge of aggression against Germany when the fact of the matter is that World War 2 began when the British and French declared war on Germany. Germany conquered France and drove the British from the European Continent after the British and French started the war with a declaration of war against Germany.

Irving’s book is, of course, politically incorrect. However, he lists in the introduction the voluminous files on which the book is based: Robert Jackson’s official papers and Oral History, Francis Biddle’s private papers and diaries, Col. Andrus’ papers, Adm. Raeder’s prison diary, Rudolf Hess’ prison diary, interrogations of the prisoners, interviews with defense counsel, prosecutors, interrogators, and letters from the prisoners to their wives. All of this and more Irving has made available on microfilms for researchers. He compared magnetic tape copies of the original wire-recordings of the trial with the mimeographed and published transcripts to insure that spoken and published words were the same.

What Irving does in his book is to report the story that the documents tell. This story differs from the patriotic propaganda written by court historians with which we are all imbued. The question arises: Is Irving pro-truth or pro-Nazi. The National Socialist government of Germany is the most demonized government in history. Any lessening of the demonization is unacceptable, so Irving is vulnerable to demonization by those determined to protect their cherished beliefs.

[Censored. – Editor] have branded Irving a “holocaust denier,” and he was convicted of something like that by an Austrian court and spent 14 months in prison before the conviction was thrown out by a higher court.

“As I understand the term, a simple truthful modification of some element of the official holocaust story is sufficient to brand a person a holocaust denier.”

In Nuremberg, Irving removes various propaganda legends from the holocaust story and reports authoritative findings that many of the concentration camp deaths were from typhus and starvation, especially in the final days of the war when food and medicine were disappearing from Germany, but nowhere in the book does he deny, indeed he reports, that vast numbers of [Censored-Ed.] perished. As I understand the term, a simple truthful modification of some element of the official holocaust story is sufficient to brand a person a holocaust denier.

My interest in the book is Robert Jackson. He had a noble cause—to outlaw war—but in pursuit of this purpose he established precedents for American prosecutors to make law a weapon in their pursuit of their noble causes just as it was used against Nazis—organized crime convictions, child abuse convictions, drug convictions, terror convictions. Jackson’s pursuit of Nazis at Nuremberg undermined the strictures he put on US attorneys such that today Americans have no more protection of law than the defendants had at Nuremberg.


Vote Purple for the People of Canada!


As you know, I am running as the PPC candidate in the upcoming Portage—Lisgar by-election.

I am going to do everything it takes to win. Pull out all the stops.

Because this is more than just a by-election. It’s about the future of our country.

This situation reminds me a lot of the Reform Party.

The Reform Party first entered Parliament in 1989 when they won a single seat in a by-election.

In the subsequent general election in 1993, 51 more MPs were sent to Ottawa. The following election saw them become the official opposition.

All the populist-conservative Reform Party needed was a foothold into Parliament, a single seat, and then the floodgates opened.

Sounds familiar?

The PPC will pick up the torch from the Reform Party, and it starts right here in Portage—Lisgar.

And we learned from the mistakes of the Reform Party.

We will never compromise our values. We won’t merge with a corrupt party. We will fight until we win and restore sanity in this country.

This by-election is a special opportunity. The start of something big.

This is how we start to take our country back from the elites and corrupt globalist politicians currently in charge.

To show the political establishment that we reject their perverted and authoritarian vision of the future.

To stand up for Canadian values and Canadian identity.

But I need your help to win this election and start turning Parliament Purple.

Pitch in $10 today to help start the political revolution in Canada.

Thank you,

P.S.: If you have trouble finding where you can donate, you can just click this link!

$BANKS$ The Debt Based Banking System

[Editor’s Note: The following article on the Debt Based Banking System by Hans J. Krampe appeared in the 1st Edition of The Radical newspaper which hit the streets of the Cariboo and soon the country back in June of 1998.

Hans Krampe was the feature writer for the newspaper throughout its short lived history (it ran from June of 1998 to June of 2002 when I took it online and it became the RadicalPress[.]com).

To commemorate this event I’ve reproduced the article along with the original graphics that appeared in the paper; one’s which Hans drew for the occasion. Tragically we lost Hans Krampe on December 14, 2014 when he succumbed to diabetes.

The article is relatively long and is an excellent overview of how the global banking system works. The final part toward the end gives Canadians a clear and cogent explanation as to how it applies to Canada and our Bank of Canada and what we, the people, can do to take back the bank from the global moneylenders and put it to work for the nation in a positive way.

It’s highly recommended that readers share this important article with their friends and associates.

One further note. Certain words within the article have been censored. This is due to legal restrictions which I am forced to obey. Most readers will likely be able to put 2+2 together and figure out the answer.]


The Fox in Charge of the Perfect Golden Goose
The Debt Based Banking System

by Hans J. Krampe
June 1998

These days concerned citizens are well advised to supply themselves with a copy of the Canadian constitution and check for themselves if our government complies with its principles.

Nowhere is vigilance more necessary than in the area of monetary policy because for almost a century the Canadian government has knowingly operated on the basis of rules that are totally incompatible with Section 91 which gives the Canadian parliament the exclusive authority to control the issue and circulation of money. Any legislation that diminishes or transfers this control is illegal since all legislation has to comply with the spirit of the constitution.

Most Canadians are deliberately misled to believer the government exercises its authority through the institution of the Bank of Canada, a Central Bank.

“The Bank of Canada, like all
Central Banks, is neither a
government bank nor is it
controlled by government.”

It is, in fact, a private corporation, operating solely to profit its shareholders which are private international moneylenders. Yet it controls our money supply.

To people like you and me it doesn’t make any sense that the federal government must borrow non-existent Canadian money from foreign moneylenders and pay usurious interest to them, when on the basis of our constitution only it can legally create and circulate Canadian currency – which would be, of course, interest free. For bankers, however, it makes not only sense but it amounts to a positively enriching experience.

In 1914, presumably in cooperation with the U.S., and despite widespread objections, an apparently ignorant and, at least, partially corrupt parliament passed the Canadian Bank Act. It represented everything international moneylenders had conspired, deceived, blackmailed and murdered for in the U.S. during the preceding century. With this act they were able to establish the Bank of Canada, their private Central Bank, which gave them total control over our money supply, our government, and the riches of our entire country. It also allowed them to operate legally their fraudulent and devastating Fractional Reserve Banking System and, as well, put our money supply on the gold standard – gold the moneylenders control.

There were, however, some objections raised concerning the legality of the Act because it conflicted blatantly with the British North America Act (B.N.A.), as it does with our current constitution. The full implementation of the Act was temporarily put on ice with the outbreak of the first World War.

Then, in 1933, the bankers and their agents in government decided that the time was ripe for implementation. With R.B. Bennett, their front man, in the position of Prime Minister they had no trouble at all to generate enthusiastic agreement in cabinet with the idea that it was better to borrow at interest what one could otherwise create interest free. Through vigorous arm twisting from R.B. Bennett, whose callous and merciless conduct towards the multitude of the unemployed is a matter of history, the establishment of the Bank of Canada was approved sat the height of the Depression and the slow drowning of our country in a sea of debt and taxes had begun.

Monetary policy of the bank is decided by its officers who meet in secrecy and keep no minutes. One wonders what makes them so shy of public exposure.

At the end of his term as Prime Minister R.B. Bennett retired to Britain to enjoy the fruits of his labour.

The following is the sixth statement statement of Thomas Jefferson, a knowledgeable and staunch opponent of privately controlled Central Banks. It illustrates what R.B. Bennett had entered our country into. Note that his language uses the word ‘people’, not taxpayers or consumers:

Ever since our country’s inception unprincipled politicians endeavored to serve our nation – on a golden platter – to the foreign moneylenders, lock, stock and barrel; guided by greed, corruption and sinister intentions. And the moneylenders have been laughing all the way to the bank. In fact, our national debt [In 1998 – Editor], of $1 trillion dollars consists of 5% money that was illegally borrowed and 95% of illegally compound interest the bankers claim are owed to them. This demonstrates the quintessential meaning of the word “usury”, which implies a criminal act. It’s also called the Debt Based Banking System, which is another fancy term for the bankers control over our government. Power and control is the name of the game, and the bankers seem to have it.

The establishment of privately controlled Central Banks in North America has been controversial and hotly contested, to say the least. The push for Central Banks was aggressively applied by the principle shareholders of the Bank of England, one of the first Central Banks and the most influential in Europe and the English speaking world. They were an exclusive club of international moneylenders which initially concentrated their efforts on the U.S. in order to gain control over the riches of the North American continent. They succeeded in the early 1800’s temporarily with the establishment of the First Bank of the United States through bribery, deceit and the use of their Fractional Reserve Banking System.

The Canadian banking system descended directly from the First Bank of the U.S. with the adoption of its charter by the Bank of Montreal. Since then its been the ambition of Canadian governments not only to copy U.S. monetary policy, along with British guidelines, to a T, but to do it one better by creating greater opportunities for Canadian banks to form monopolies which, these days, is called free enterprise. Now the Canadian public can be fleeced much more efficiently. In other words, Canadian and the U.S. Central Bankers have the same goals, use the same methods, have a common past and pursue a common future.

Before we say ‘so what?’, let’s examine what a variety of statesmen, based on their experience, had to say about the machinations of international moneylenders and their relentless and often violent drive for the establishment of a Central Bank which raged, particularly in the U.S., back and forth for two centuries.

Again, Thomas Jefferson:

President Andrew Jackson, ‘Old Hickory’, considered it his life’s greatest achievement that he had killed the Second Bank of the U.S. in 1836 which had been operating since 1816 as a private Central Bank with disastrous effects on the economy. His statement is almost identical to Jefferson’s sixth statement:

“Controlling our currency,
receiving our public monies,
and holding thousands of our
citizens in dependence
would be more formidable and
dangerous than a military power
of the enemy.”

James Madison, fourth president of the U.S. equated the private moneylenders with the biblical moneylenders and had this to say about them:

“History records that the
moneychangers have used
every form of abuse, intrigue,
deceit and violent means
possible to maintain their
control over governments by
controlling money and its

Abraham Lincoln wrote in 1864, shortly before his assassination, in a letter to a friend:

“The money power preys
on the nation in times of peace
and conspires against it in
times of adversity. It is more
despotic than monarchy, more
insolent than autocracy, more
selfish than bureaucracy.”

Napoleon Bonaparte, whose contempt and distrust of the moneylenders and their Bank of France is a matter of record, refused their offer of credit and financed his European war campaigns with the proceeds from the sale of France’s North American colonies (the Louisiana Purchase). This is how he perceived them:

“The hand that giveth is
above the hand that takes.
Money has no motherland.
Financiers are without
patriotism and without
decency. Their sole object is

President James Garfield knew how the economy was being manipulated. As a congressman he had been chairman of the appropriations committee and a member of the banking and currency. After his inauguration in 1881 he publicly exposed the moneylenders conduct in a passionate indictment:

“Whosoever controls the
volume of money in any
country is absolute master of all
industry and commerce…. And
when you realize that the entire
system is very easily controlled,
one way or another, by a few
powerful men at the top, you
will not have to be told how
periods of inflation and
depression originate.”

Within a few weeks of making this statement, on July 2nd, 1881, James Garfield was assassinated.

Those of us who believe that periods of boom and bust (i.e. the “business cycle”) are an act of God, should really submit to a reality check. Depression, inflation and recession are planned and executed by those who control the money supply. And the do it ruthlessly without conscience or any regard for life, and even brag about it. The increase of the money supply beyond the smooth function of exchange causes inflation, i.e. decline in purchasing power. Contraction of the money supply means depression, unemployment and suffering for most of us. For the moneylenders it means cheap acquisition of assets due to forfeiture, for a penny on the dollar.

The following is an unconcealed threat of blackmail that illustrates the criminal mindset of the proponents of privately controlled Central Banks. Nicholas Biddle, a Central Banker, threatening to cause a depression by contracting the money supply if President Andrew Jackson would not re-charter the Second Bank of the U.S., a Central Bank, in 1836 openly declared:

“This worthy President
thinks that because he has
scalped Indians and
imprisoned judges, he is to
have his way with the bank.
He is mistaken.
“Nothing but
widespread suffering will
produce any effect on
congress… our only safety is in
pursuing a steady course of
firm restriction [of money] –
and I have no doubt that such a
course will ultimately lead to
restoration of the currency and
the re-charter of the bank.”

By ‘currency’ Biddle meant money based on the gold standard – gold which the Central Bankers controlled.

Money doesn’t have to be based on a gold standard to be an effective medium of exchange. History shows us that anything upon can be used as a medium of exchange – even pieces of wood, such as the tally sticks of the Middle Ages in England, which were used for 700 years as the longest lasting medium of exchange in the world.

Here is a classical illustration of the subservient manner in which the established media rides on the coattails of corporate wealth. In 1862, in an extraordinary bout of frankness, the London Times had this to say about the U.S. government which, under Lincoln, created its own debt free money supply by issuing a totally fiat currency, the famous ‘Greenback’:

“If this mischievous
financial policy, which has its
origins in North America, shall
become indurated down to a
fixture, then that government
will furnish its own money
without cost. It will pay off
debts and will be without
debts. It will have all the
money necessary to carry on its
commerce. It will become
prosperous without precedent
in the history of the world. The
brains and wealth of all
countries will go to North
America. That country must be
destroyed or it will destroy
every monarchy on the globe.”

In 1864 Lincoln’s former Secretary of the Treasury, Salmon P. Chase, regretting his role in the passage of the National Banking Act a year earlier, lamented:

“My agency in
promoting the passage of the
National Banking Act was the
greatest financial mistake in my
life. It has built up a monopoly
which affects every interest in
the country.”

As an aside, here’s what [censored-Ed.], the quintessential moneylender, pronounced in 1790 from his bank in Frankfurt, Germany:

“Let me issue and control
a nation’s money and I care not
who writes the laws.”

History has born out the validity of all these statements.

One thing needs to be stressed: yes, we do need a Central Bank, but we don’t need it under the control of private and anonymous financiers, operating in secrecy.

Under private control a Central Bank becomes a dangerous instrument of exploitation which a relatively small and exclusive number of anti-social individuals use to enrich themselves without risk, without limits and without commitments.

In the hands of the people (i.e. government), however, it becomes an empowering institution that potentially facilitates and protects the endeavors of a nation for the benefit of all society.

The goldsmiths of the Middle Ages were acting as bankers by keeping the people’s gold in safe storage for which they would issue a paper receipt. This was the birth of paper money. Observing that people never came at the same time to withdraw all their gold the goldsmiths started to cheat on the system. They would loan more paper receipts than they had gold in storage and collect interest on them. Thus they had created the Fractional Reserve Banking System.

In a nutshell, here is how it works today.

Let’s say the government needs $1 million. It simply issues government bonds – which are, in fact, I.O.U.’s – in that amount and offers them as security. Without actual money changing hands the Central Bank accepts the bonds and credits the government with $1 million. Loans to the government are covered by our taxes, as is the interest, which is usually somewhere between 24% and 35%. In other words government loans are virtually risk free and yield the highest interest, for which you and I are paying through the nose with our taxes, via our government and the Central Bank, right into the pockets of the moneylenders.

Through the magic of Fractional Reserve Banking the bank is permitted to use government bonds as reserve as if they were money, and lend ten times the amount, all at interest. Hence the term “Fractional Reserve”. The bank now collects, arbitrarily, any interest that it figures the market will bear. For example, 8% interest on $1 million x10 on non-existent money they lend to the public equals 80%, plus 35% on $1 million amounts to a profit of 115% in interest that the bankers have created out of nothing, all at no risk. If you or I did this kind of thing we would be charged with fraud – a felony.

All banks operate under this system. This way they create money out of nothing, lend it and collect usurious interest. It is obvious that Fractional Reserve Banking is rooted in fraud. It causes widespread poverty and reduces the value of everybody else’s money, causing 90% of all inflation.

The diligent application of the Fractional Reserve Banking System combined with control over Europe’s Central Banks made the legendary [Censored-Editor] clan the richest family on earth, owning by the turn of the century, over half the world’s wealth. There is no indication that their wealth has ceased to grow since then.

Throughout history Canadian governments have been dominated by members of the wealthy establishment to ensure the entrenchment and expansion of their financial interests. It is reasonable to assume that humanitarian issues played only a secondary role when they formulated our constitution which isn’t couched in a language of the people but rather in the uninspired and opaque wording of business and law. It is riddled with amendments which the various governments seem to have hatched secretly and in collusion with corporate lawyers who insured that the wording is ambiguous enough to facilitate easy circumvention of the humanitarian rules on the surface. Corporate lobbyists routinely monopolize government’s time in an effort to erode the unassailability of our constitutional protection and, in general, they meet with enthusiastic cooperation since our governmental positions have become home to corporate imposters for decades.

Today, in terms of fiscal decisions, the question of conspiracy has been raised repeatedly by alert citizens, compelled by their gut feelings and their observations of the implications and effects of government policies before the background of history. The possibilities of Prime Ministers as well as Cabinet Ministers conspiring with international moneylenders or acting treasonously on their behalf is routinely and facetiously shrugged off by the established media, as if such ridiculous allegations couldn’t possibly be true in the pristine political climate of today. Yet, the involvement of conspiracy of recent PM’s and cabinet ministers is glaringly implied by the speedy and well executed implementation of disastrous policies they didn’t dare mention during their election campaigns.

Lies, deceit and the casual breach of important election promises have become routine tools of the trade in Canadian politics which indicates that politicians were already in league with the felonious money interests before they got elected. In this scenario the charge of treason and conspiracy is simply common sense.

So, what happens when a government creates its own debt free money? The moneylenders, of course, will hate it and make all sorts of dire noises. After all, fear-mongering, deceit, lies and even the resort to violence are second nature to them.

But let’s look at the Island of Guernsey in the English Channel. For 200 years the Guernsey government has been financing all its capital expenditure projects with debt free money they created out of nothing. As a consequence their economy is stable, with no sharp declines and very little inflation. Prosperity and peace are the result.

In the early 1700’s the British colonies in North America were relatively poor until they started to issue their own paper money, which they called ‘Colonial Scrip’. Very quickly the standard of living rose, there was full employment, and people prospered until the British government forbade Colonial Scrip and demanded its taxes in gold. Within a year the colonies plunged back into poverty, the streets were filled with the unemployed, and the people again struggled to survive.

The coliseum in Rome, the aqueducts, the great roads of the Roman Empire, were all built under Julius Caesar who used debt free silver coin to pay for it. Caesar made sure money was plentiful by using silver and the people prospered and loved him for it. The moneychangers hated his guts. One of the main reasons for his assassination was probably his monetary policy.

Last, but not least, there is the famous Greenback which Lincoln used to finance his armies and the civil war. It was debt free money, not based on the gold standard and was used until 1994, when it was taken out of circulation and replaced with money borrowed from the U.S. Federal Reserve, another private Central Bank, whose interest is compounding into the stratosphere.

Here is what Abraham Lincoln had to say about governments’ control over the issue of money:

“The government should
create, issue and circulate all
the currency and credit needed
to satisfy the spending power
of governments and the buying
power of consumers.
“The privilege of
creating and issuing money is
not only the supreme
prerogative of government, but
it is government’s greatest
creative opportunity.
“By the adoption of these
principles… the taxpayer will
be saved immense sums of
interest. Money will cease to
be master and become the
servant of humanity.”

History shows us that Lincoln’s opposition to the charter of the Central Bank and the establishment of a gold based currency seems to be the most likely reason for his assassination by John Wilkes Booth. Evidence that has been deleted from the public record and that the Canadian attorney G. G. McGeer obtained from secret service agents who had been present at Booth’s trial revealed in 1934 that Booth was a mercenary in the empty of the international moneylenders.

Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, the creator of the German nation and the first statesman to introduce a national social program, observed closely the activities of the moneylenders in the United States. Here is the almost clairvoyant assessment he made of the assassination of Lincoln:

“The death of Lincoln
was a disaster for Christendom.
There was no good in the
United States great enough to
wear his boots… I fear that
foreign bankers with their
craftiness and tortuous tricks
will entirely control the
exuberant riches of America
and use it to systematically
corrupt modern civilization.
They will not hesitate to
plunge the whole of
Christendom into war and
chaos in order that the earth
shall become their inheritance.”

In retrospect we can discern in the last two decades a clear demonstration of how the moneylenders control governments via their Central Banking system. We have also seen the consequences of their control. Buzz words like “global economy’, ‘restructuring’, [the Great “RESET” of the WEF today. Editor] and ‘decentralization’ are merely fancy rhetoric that try to conceal conditions of merciless exploitation, spread destitution and relentless environmental degradation.

The triumph of corporate crime over human decency cannot be tolerated by an enlightened society that desires to live in peace and dignity. Hopefully, a threshold of patience is reached soon that compels the Canadian public to call for an in-depth investigation into the Bank of Canada, its officers, and their activities.

It will be necessary for citizens to form a unified front to force government into a conduct not only in compliance with principles of our constitution but also with acceptable measures of integrity, decency and compassion that can and will be expected from representatives of our society.

Here are three basic suggestions on which meaningful monetary reform can be expanded:

1.) Cancel the Bank Act of 1914 and put the control of the Bank of Canada where it legally belongs… in the hands of the people, our federal government.

2.) Amend the constitution, forbidding the government to borrow money – anywhere. This would force government to exercise its exclusive prerogative to create and circulate money… at no interest.

3.) Phase in a new bank act which permits chartered banks to operate only under a 100% reserve system, while replacing the present gold based money with a fiat currency.



Canada Wide Alert! PPC Leader Maxime Bernier to Run in Portage—Lisgar Manitoba Bi-election!

[Editor’s Note: The time has come the Walrus said to speak of many things: Of traitors – Liars – Sell-outs – of Tranny’s without things. Of mainstream media mendacity – of global schemes with string – attached to politicians like Sauron’s golden ring.

But fret not dear reader for we have another ring; one to evoke hope and resistance to the 3 Dark Lords who now pose an imminent threat to Canada’s sovereignty and her freedoms.

Maxime Bernier has bit the ring so to speak and will be vying for a seat in that rockpile in Ottawa where he can begin his tireless efforts to weld together all the dissatisfied and despairing citizens of this great nation into one unified party under the purple flag of peace and prosperity and plenty. In order to accomplish this Herculean goal he needs the help of ‘the people’ of Canada from sea to shining sea. He will also need the coin necessary for the task at hand. So be generous as you are able to be. Together, with Truth & Love on our side, we can, as Max has stated in his article, really MAKE HISTORY!”]

Arthur, Let’s Make History!

I have some very exciting news to share with you today!

After much consideration, I have made the decision to run in one of the upcoming by-elections.

I will be running as the PPC candidate for Portage—Lisgar in Manitoba!

This by-election is an incredible opportunity for us to elect our first ever PPC Member of Parliament.

In the 2021 election, Portage—Lisgar was our best result around the country, with our candidate there garnering roughly 22% of the vote.

It was where we hosted the biggest rally in the Party’s history with more than 3,000 patriotic Canadians joining me in a farmer’s field near Winkler to demand our rights and freedoms back.

And it was just outside this riding where I was wrongly arrested two years ago for refusing to comply with immoral, unconstitutional, and tyrannical covid restrictions imposed on us.

I feel a special connection to this riding. This is where the renewal of our country will begin.

Arthur, I am really excited about this.

Our path to victory has never been so clear.

We have a real shot here, but there is still a lot of work to be done to secure our victory and start getting Canada back on track.

I’ll need an army of volunteers to help me get our message out, and knock on every door across the riding.

If you live in or near Portage—Lisgar and are able to help out, please click this link and fill out our volunteer form.

If you’re not able to help out on the ground, please consider making a financial contribution to support our efforts.

You don’t need to live in Portage—Lisgar or even Manitoba. PPC supporters from coast to coast to coast can get involved by making a $5, $20, or $100 donation today.

Arthur, elections are expensive, and we’re going to need to pull out all the stops if we’re going to beat the fake Conservatives that have held this riding for many years.

We need to pay for campaign literature, election signs, billboards, advertising on social media, radio ads, newspaper ads, rent for a campaign office and so much more.

We have to do a full court press to get this done.

Let’s send a strong message to the Ottawa elite class and the political establishment.

Let’s show Pierre Poilievre and the fake Conservatives that Canadians expect more than his milquetoast brand of politics, that there are necessary cultural battles that can’t be ignored.

Let’s make history.

Help get behind my campaign to get back into the House of Commons with a $20 donation today!

Thank you,


P.S.: If you have trouble finding where you can donate, you can just click this link!


Follow the PPC on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Rumble, Odysee, Gab, and Telegram.

Follow Max on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Rumble, Gettr, and Telegram.

To make a donation with a cheque, please use this address: Suite 700, 1 Nicholas St, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 7B7. The cheque must be made payable to People’s Party of Canada.

To make an online donation, please visit our website:

People’s Party of Canada
Thank you!

The Covid Jabs Have Created Millions of Zombies

The Covid Jabs Have Created Millions of Zombies

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

I believe that the vaccine pushers knew that the inadequately tested and unnecessary covid jab was going to kill huge swathes of populations around the world.

I now believe that the deaths and the maimings weren’t side effects at all – they were the main effects. And in addition to the deaths and the serious health problems (heart disease for example) the jabs have caused serious brain damage and a new population of zombies. It is because of this brain damage that so many people readily accept digital currencies, the banishment of cash and other steps towards total slavery. The vaxxed are different to the rest of us: they don’t notice what is happening. In the land of the vaxxed, the cretin is king.

(The alternative explanation is that the vaccine pushers were so ignorant that they didn’t realise what would happen. And I don’t think that these arrogant, wicked people will want to be thought stupid. They would rather be recognised for what they are. The vaccine pushers took the bows, the honours and the money. When justice prevails at last, they will pay for their heinous sins. Incidentally, I find it nauseating that doctors in the UK are on strike for more money but that they and their trade union leaders encouraged the jabbing and denied that there were serious risks.)

It was back in December 2020 that I first started warning about the serious health problems which would affect the gullible folk who succumbed to the lies and misinformation shared so widely and enthusiastically by governments, the medical establishment and the mainstream media. (That video is available on this website and if the wind blows in the right direction you can probably find copies on Bitchute and BrandNewTube. If there aren’t copies there I’d be delighted if someone would put right that omission!)

On 13th December 2021 (16 months ago) I issued a specific warning about the brain damage that would be caused by the covid-19 jab. The media and the millions ignored the warning, of course.

Here is what I said back in December 2021:

It has been established that there is much that no one yet knows about the covid-19 jabs and the eagerness of the Medicines and healthcare products regulatory agency in the UK to licence a product about which information appeared to be lacking has never been adequately explained. We do know however that, as I was the first to reveal, the MHRA received a huge sum of money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation – which has financial links with jab producers such as Pfizer.

As far as the effect on the brain is concerned the big question is, can the lipid nanoparticles carry the mRNA jab across the blood brain barrier?

The blood brain barrier is a semi permeable barrier of cells which prevent some substances in the blood from crossing into the protective fluid around the central nervous system.

It is vital to know if this happens because if it does then all bets are off as to what might happen to the brain.

And after all, liquid nanoparticles are already used to deliver other drugs across the blood brain barrier.
If the LNPs carry the mRNA jab into the brain then the neurons, the brain cells, might be marked as foreign by the body’s immune system. And as more booster jabs are given, the problem will get worse.

The worry is that brain cells might be targeted and killed by cytotoxic T cells.

It has now been established that mRNA has been found in all human tissues except the kidney. It has been found in heart, lung, liver, testicles – and brain. A Japanese study, for example, showed that the vaccine does end up in the brain.

Also worrying is the fact that researchers have called for studies to investigate any relationship between jabs and acute CNS demyelination.

How much damage will this do?

How long will it take before brain damage can be identified?

I don’t have the foggiest idea.

And nor does anyone else.

In a normal experiment with a new drug, doctors would be looking and checking all the possible problems before releasing the drug for widespread use.
But the covid-19 jabs are being rolled out to billions without any one having the faintest idea what will happen.

If you have been jabbed, the first certainty seems to be that the mRNA vaccine will enter your brain.

The second certainty is that the more covid jabs you have, the more dangerous this will be.

How many of your brain cells will die is something only time will tell. And children, of course, will be more vulnerable because they are more vulnerable anyway and because they are likely to live longer.

Some experts, advisors and regulators will tell you that the risks are small. But how can they know that? And what is small? They told us that the blood clotting problems were small.

In my view, having one of these jabs is the equivalent of taking a huge dose of LSD and waiting to see what happens. And hoping that you’re not going to end up like an ageing rock star who thinks that the Cuban Missile Crisis is the biggest threat currently facing mankind.

And, remember, the covid-19 jabs don’t stop you getting covid-19 and they don’t stop you passing it on. According to the NHS’s own guidelines in the UK you can still get or spread covid-19 even if you have had three jabs.

If this jab were being given for a lethal disease with a 50% mortality rate then the risks might be worth taking. It’s not and they’re not.’

That is what I said in December 2021.

And now that we are in 2023, I believe that at least some of those promoting the covid jab must have known that the jab would cause serious brain damage.

And I now believe that the millions who were jabbed are already showing signs of serious brain damage; their behaviour is often quite abnormal.

The other day, for example, I saw hundreds of people sitting on a sandy beach on a cloudy, windy, freezing cold day. The people were all wearing winter coats, hats and scarves and they were just sitting there, staring into space and doing nothing. Honest. It was scary. It was like something out of the Twilight Zone.

Look around and you too will see strange behaviour among those who were jabbed. Their brains have definitely been affected.

I believe that the promoters of the covid jabs knew that this would happen. The jabs have created millions of modern day, real life zombies.

And so, of course, the zombies say nothing when bank branches close. They have accepted that cash is dangerous and out of date. They will welcome digital currencies.

They cheer on the senseless, cruel war in Ukraine because they have been brainwashed into believing that it is justified.

And they don’t object to the 15 minute cities which will effectively imprison them.

I even believe that the doctors and nurses who are striking for more money are doing so because they have been brain damaged by the jabs they accepted so naively.

The vaxxed are different to the rest of us.

The promoters of the covid-19 jab have created a new species of sub-humans.


Paragons of Ethical Medicine Attacked by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC

Paragons of Ethical Medicine Attacked by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC

Dr. Matthew Evans-Cockle

Left unchecked, the arbitrary power of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC threatens the health and well-being of all British Columbians as well as the core values of Canadian democracy.

A handful of headstrong, and ethically courageous, British Columbian doctors have stood up and voiced their concerns about the potential harms associated with our provincial COVID-19 policies. Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater have all run afoul of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC. In the interest of brevity and clarity, the reflections that follow will be confined to a single case—that of Dr. Charles Hoffe, who was one of the first, if not the first, BC physician to be censured by the College.

According to the Vancouver Sun, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has issued a citation for Dr. Charles Douglas Hoffe, alleging that his “online comments contravened the standards of the Health Professions Act including the Canadian Medical Association’s code of ethics and professionalism.” The Vancouver Sun article further relates that Doctor Hoffe is accused of uttering a number of public health heresies.

The heresies of Doctor Charles Hoffe, we are told, are many and grievous. First, he has suggested that the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines may cause “microscopic blood clots.” Such microscopic blood clots, he has allegedly stated, might contribute to severe neurological issues as well as a wide range of other serious harms. On this matter, the College is unfazed by the unprecedented numbers and varieties of harms reported in the world’s most prominent and widely recognized reporting systems, such as the American VAERS, UK’s Yellow Card, European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance, and the World Health Organization’s VigiSafe systems. A second heresy for which Dr. Hoffe is reproached, is his suggestion that “vaccinated persons can cause harm to unvaccinated persons.” The College appears steady in their resolve to censure Hoffe on this matter, unshaken by the growing body of evidence that mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19 or its variants, or apparently reduce the occurrence of severe COVID-19. But the third, and perhaps greatest of Dr. Hoffe’s heresies is his suggestion that “ivermectin is an advisable treatment for COVID-19!”(1)

Health Canada historically and presently supports the use of approved medicines such as ivermectin for off-label indications at the discretion of prescribing physicians if there are compelling reasons why the doctors believe they may be helpful to their patients. The College’s attack on this statement is particularly ludicrous given its confirmation by no less an authority than Dr. Tess Lawrie, the director of Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, UK. With respect to the advisability of ivermectin in treating COVID-19, Dr. Lawrie has conducted a meta-analysis of 15 trials, following the gold-standard Cochrane protocol. While citing both the well-known safety profile and very low cost of ivermectin, Dr. Lawrie’s meta-analysis concludes that with the aid of this essential medicine “large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible” and, that “[u]sing ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease.”(2)

As though Hoffe’s fantastically reckless claim that “ivermectin is an advisable treatment for COVID-19”, were not offensive enough… As though it were not absolutely intolerable that Dr. Hoffe’s assertion is now supported by not just one, but multiple meta-analyses(3)… As if this weren’t already dreadful enough, the allegedly off-his-rocker doctor stands accused of suggesting that people wishing to make use of this treatment disregard its prohibition by Public Health! If Public Health refuses to make this potentially life-saving and inexpensive treatment available—a treatment with an unparalleled safety profile, a treatment already administered billions of times all around the world, a treatment with incredibly few adverse events recorded after over 40 years of use—Dr. Hoffe, I say—echoing the righteous, thundering indignation of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC—has had the unmitigated gall to suggest that the public might be justified in obtaining it “from animal feed stores” where it is also available.

But all kidding aside, to an increasing number of gravely concerned British Columbians, the disciplinary actions undertaken by The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC against Dr. Hoffe and his fellow physicians for identifying issues of concern regarding the COVID mandates and recommendations pronounced by Public Health authorities, appear arbitrary, vindictive, and against the public interest. To these citizens, the College appears to be aggressively persecuting highly qualified and conscientious medical professionals for acting according to the dictates of their conscience, knowledge, and sworn oath to do no harm. These doctors have felt compelled to comply with their duties to patients and the community by voicing science-based concerns about potential harms associated with the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccine, and by drawing attention to the benefits of early treatment. For casting doubt upon the reliability of the Public Health authority’s COVID-19 policies, they have drawn the ire of the BC College, yet for many British Columbians, these courageous physicians embody the spirit of both ethical medicine and social responsibility.

If the actions taken against these doctors by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC are contrary to the spirit of ethical medicine and the dictates of a socially responsible conscience, they are also contrary to the spirit of the law in Canada. According to the Canadian concept of law, a citizen cannot be both accused of a crime and also stripped of the ability to answer the accusation. When the College suspends a doctor’s license it thereby prevents that doctor from earning income. Without income, such doctors will be unable to effectively pay the legal fees required to mount an adequate defense in answering the accusations made against them.

The punitive actions undertaken by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC are made even more outrageous by their complete lack of reasonable grounds. Again and again, the people of BC have heard from Interior Health, Public Health, and the Minister of Health, that their shared goal is to ensure the safety of British Columbians. To this end, they have prohibited physicians and other healthcare providers from publicly expressing opinions that contradict official Public Health recommendations and orders. To contradict these recommendations, they say, is to put people’s lives at risk by encouraging vaccine hesitancy. And yet, time and again, to compel uninformed or poorly informed compliance, our public health authorities have provided misleading, erroneous, or inadequate information to justify orders and recommendations. Assertions concerning the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines have been disproven. Assertions concerning the safety and efficacy of mask wearing and social distancing have been disproven. Similarly, assertions by Public Health authorities concerning the safety and efficacy of lockdown measures have been disproven. While falsely touting the benefits of these mandates, Public Health authorities have been silent or misleading about the risks. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has censured doctors for attempting to prevent harm by providing patients and others with some of the information needed to make informed decisions about COVID-19 treatment.

At this stage, we should all know that the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. Indeed, Pfizer executive Janine Small has admitted, before a European Union parliamentary hearing, that Pfizer did not test the vaccine for preventing transmission of COVID-19 prior to it being made available to the public. U.S. CDC director Rochelle Walensky has publicly admitted the vaccines can’t prevent transmission.(4)

And viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle has written, “the current COVID-19 vaccines fail to induce what we call ‘sterilizing immunity’. This means that vaccinated individuals can still get infected with SARS-CoV-2, potentially become ill, and potentially transmit the virus to others.”(5)

At this stage, we should all know that not only do the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines not prevent hospitalization or death but that vaccine adverse event reporting systems around the world are showing higher rates of mortality for these mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines than for any other vaccines in history. Looking at the US VAERS, the UK Yellow Card, and the World Health Organization VigiAccess systems, in less than three years more vaccine injuries have been reported in connection with the COVID-19 vaccines than from the combined sum of all other vaccines administered over the past three decades.

Once upon a time, members of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC might have believed there were adequate scientific grounds for promoting the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines as safe and effective. Now, however, it has been made abundantly clear, and that for a good long time already, that no such grounds exist. With over 35,000 COVID-19 vaccine deaths and over 2,400,000 adverse events reported in the US VAERS alone, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC should be pulling out their bullhorns and shouting from the rooftops: “these genetic vaccines are NOT safe, and they are NOT effective!” Instead, the College has prohibited physicians from expressing concerns about the safety and efficacy of these genetic vaccines on the grounds that to express such concerns puts people at risk by encouraging vaccine hesitancy. It appears patently obvious, however, that when we set about administering any new treatment, it is precisely by prohibiting physicians from sharing their opinions—as qualified, experienced, and ethically conscientious medical professionals—that we put people at risk.

The College’s disciplinary actions clearly prohibit or impair not just those targeted, but all physicians from carrying out their professional and ethical duties to ensure provision of individualized health care which includes providing information, specialized knowledge and careful advice about the risks and benefits of recommended medical products and about alternative treatments. The disciplinary actions by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC also violate our physicians’ protected rights including rights to: work and earn income as physicians; due process; remedies for rights violations; freedom of expression; and their right to participate in governance and decision making.

All of these rights, which the BC College is violating through their autocratic disciplinary actions, are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Now, discussions of Charter rights and freedoms tend to be inconclusive, because it is difficult, on the basis of the Charter alone, to reach a useful end or stable determination. There is a simple reason for this. From a legal perspective, the Canadian Charter is a weak constitutional document. It is weak in the sense that it does not, on its own, provide clear and definitive guidance on the general matters with which it is concerned. This does not mean, however, that no such guidance is possible. On the contrary, the relatively weak guidance provided by the Charter can be reinforced through reference to another body of law.

It is important, and also very helpful, to recognize that the Canadian Charter can and should be interpreted in accordance with the many international human rights treaties signed by Canada. When it comes to compliance with treaty obligations, one might say the entire world is watching; or to quote from section 8 of the Canadian “Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament”, “Under international law, a treaty creates international legal obligations for Canada.”

By referring to international human rights treaty law it is possible to throw much needed light on some of the more obscure, ambivalent, and vague sections of the Charter. Our physicians’ rights—the rights which are being violated by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC—are protected under the Charter and they are further protected under international human rights law treaties to which Canada is a party. The guidance these treaties provide is definitive and clear and the protection they provide is unquestionable—for these treaties are binding upon Canada. These include, but are not limited to, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

In addition to stripping physicians of Charter rights and freedoms, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC’s disciplinary proceedings also deprive patients of their essential rights to informed consent to medical treatment, freedom from coercion or force to accept a medical treatment not voluntarily chosen, and freedom from non-consensual medical or scientific experimentation. As ought to be widely known, these last two rights are absolute. They cannot be restricted under any circumstances, including those pertaining to public health emergencies. These laws are, in fact, part of the peremptory right to freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In addition, the illegitimate disciplinary actions undertaken by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC have had a chilling effect on non-targeted BC physicians whose silent acquiescence to harmful covid mandates has likely harmed hundreds of thousands of patients in this province alone. This is not an abstract issue that only concerns lawmakers and stuffy bureaucrats; it is a deeply personal crisis that affects Canadians living in major metropolitan centres across the country as surely as it reaches into the heart of rural townships throughout the Southern, Interior and Northern reaches of B.C.

“It is no great stretch to imagine that many of those who have lost loved ones subsequent to vaccination, and a great many more who have been injured, are now calling out for justice. Far from wishing to see BC doctors punished for speaking out, a great many of these might wish to see the Colleges rebuked and disciplined—if not dismantled—for prohibiting their doctors from providing them with the responsible medical counsel required to make properly informed risk benefit analyses. By effectively muzzling BC physicians, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has deprived British Columbians of their legal right to informed consent. This, in turn, has led to an inevitable desire for justice among the vaccine injured and bereaved.”

It is no great stretch to imagine that many of those who have lost loved ones subsequent to vaccination, and a great many more who have been injured, are now calling out for justice. Far from wishing to see BC doctors punished for speaking out, a great many of these might wish to see the Colleges rebuked and disciplined—if not dismantled—for prohibiting their doctors from providing them with the responsible medical counsel required to make properly informed risk benefit analyses. By effectively muzzling BC physicians, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has deprived British Columbians of their legal right to informed consent. This, in turn, has led to an inevitable desire for justice among the vaccine injured and bereaved.

The broader legal context and consequences of the BC College’s autocratic policies and punitive actions against Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater are of enormous importance. With the College’s persecutory proceedings against these physicians, we are witness to non-consensual and arbitrary imposition of orders, arbitrary punishment, and arbitrary withdrawal of privileges. This is not only contrary to the Spirit of the law in Canada—it is an outright attack on Canadians’ most fundamental participatory and democratic societal values. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has dealt a terrible blow to doctors’ freedom to practice ethical medicine in the province of British Columbia. If the College’s arbitrary punishment of Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater is allowed to stand, it will set a precedent that threatens the constitutionally protected societal values of all Canadians, while destroying the right to provide and receive personalized healthcare in BC. If these doctors’ ethical actions on behalf of their patients are not vindicated, it will hamper the ability of all BC doctors to provide honest and informed consultations that are in the best interests of their patients, because these doctors, in turn, will fear that their own ability to practice medicine may be threatened if they do so.

In closing this discussion of ethical medicine and the ill-advisement of autocratic authority in matters of public safety, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of a fundamental principle of human rights recognized the world over: health professionals are under a legal obligation “to document and report torture and ill-treatment in all contexts(6).”

Declaring a pandemic does not mean that authorities and health professionals no longer need to respect the rule of law and the rights and freedoms of individuals. On the contrary, even if a domestic law were to be changed, it cannot be used as an excuse to suspend rights guaranteed under treaties signed by Canada.

Highly qualified and ethically conscientious medical practitioners, doctors willing to risk their own livelihoods in order to advocate for the well-being of their patients, are a precious commodity. When doctors have science-based concerns about potential harms to their patients, they must be not only allowed, but encouraged to speak out. To punitively restrict and silence doctors, to prevent them from acting according to their conscience, to prevent them from fulfilling their fiduciary duty towards their patients is recklessly poor policy. In light of the above, and in compliance with its statutory and ethical duty to the people of this province, I urge the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC to immediately withdraw all proceedings against Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater. I further urge the College to take whatever measures are necessary to enable these doctors’ return to practicing medicine. The value of these doctors’ principled stand against the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC’s autocratic imposition of ill-advised public-health policy cannot be overstated. Exemplary embodiments of the spirit of ethical medicine and social responsibility, these physicians are to be applauded for the tremendous efforts they have made on behalf of all British Columbians.


Contact: Dr. Cockle


1 An overview of the current state of research on ivermectin use in the treatment of COVID-19:

2 Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP4. Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines. American Journal of Therapeutics 28(4):p e434-e460, July/August 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402

3 Kory, P., Meduri, G.U., Iglesias, J., Varon, J., Berkowitz, K., Kornfeld, H., . . . Marik, P.E. (2021). Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Am J Therapeutic. 28, 299-318. Retrieved from ing_Evidence_Demonstrating_the.4.aspx?WT.mc_id=HPxADx20100319xMP


5 (page 29).

6 …based on the obligation of States under international law, as well as the ethical obligations of health professionals.” (see the Istanbul Protocol – Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, June 2022 Edition at para. 603)


[EDITOR’S NOTE: The time has come for all those patriotic, freedom-loving Canadians who now realize there’s only ONE federal party to vote for if they wish to take back Canada from the NWO criminal cartel to get up off their complacent knees, stand up strong and free and put their collective shoulders to the wheel.

Common sense tells us that to attempt, once again, to replace the Liberals with the Conservatives or the NDP would be a most unfortunate and futile endeavor on the part of Canadians who truly want to see real and lasting changes come about for this beleaguered nation.

Speaking of ‘common sense’ reminds one of the writings of America’s Godfather, Thomas Paine, who, in his pamphlet Crisis, written prior to the war for Independence in an effort to unite the patriots, had the following to say:

“These are times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands it now deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.”

Were I twenty years younger I would welcome the opportunity to stand as a PPC candidate and be a part of Max Bernier’s People Party of Canada. I’ve ‘been there done that’ in the past and know just how challenging such an endeavor is. Nonetheless, I too will be doing everything I can to assist in this vital effort on other levels.

Are there 342 dedicated Canadians out there who will step up to the plate in a united effort to save Canada from the throes and woes that the NWO psychopaths have planned for us? Time will tell but the least that one might do would be to share this important message from Max Bernier with your friends and neighbours in order to get the word out.]


I need 342 courageous Canadian patriots to step up.

I am working on building my team for the next election.

Selecting candidates for every riding in the country. I need courageous leaders willing to stand by my side and spread our message in their communities so we can succeed in the next election and start getting Canada back on track.

I am often asked, “How did things get this bad?”

It’s because over the last 50 or so years, leftists have worked diligently to take over every aspect of our society.

Not just municipal, provincial, and federal governments. They’ve taken over schools, universities, and school boards. Charities, churches, and courts. Cultural institutions like television networks and media companies. Not to mention bureaucracies at every level.

Once they take on these positions, these leftists are unafraid to push their political philosophy through their work.

The result has been complete dominance of the leftist worldview, not only in government but through our culture as well. People hardly understand what it means to be conservative anymore.

This cultural dominance of the left acts as a backstop politically. If so-called “Conservatives” are lucky enough to get elected, they’ve typically watered down their beliefs to the point where they’re hardly different from the left!

This explains the corruption of the fake Conservative Party here in Canada. They have submitted to the fact that the left dominates society and instead of working to change that, they work within the left’s framing.

So you’re probably wondering, “What’s the solution?”

I’m reminded of a quote generally attributed to Sir Edmund Burke.

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”

The fatal flaw of small-c conservatives like you and me is we’re individualist by nature, and we mostly care about our immediate communities.

Typically we want to be left alone so we can raise our families, work our jobs, and get involved in charities, religious or community groups that we care about.

But this has left a vacuum in the larger society that the left has taken full advantage of.

So we need good men and women to start getting involved. To reclaim our governments, schools, and cultural institutions.

That’s why I started the PPC. I knew from working inside the CPC that it was a lost cause, and true conservatives needed a new party to start taking back Canadian society from misguided leftists.

For the last month and a half I have been working on building our team of PPC candidates to represent the Party in the next election.

We’ve received interest from some incredible applicants so far, and I am confident that our next slate of candidates will be our best ever!

That being said, there are still more than 100 ridings we have not received applications for.

If you think you’d make a great PPC Candidate, submit an application today!

But Arthur, I won’t lie to you, being a PPC Candidate isn’t easy. We’re the underdogs and the deck is stacked against us.

The left is terrified of having to deal with a true conservative opposition with a distinct vision for this country. They prefer Pierre Poilievre and his weak, unprincipled CPC.

They’ll weaponize their institutional power against you—against us. The political establishment, the corporate media, and professional activists, will work in tandem to try and cancel you.

Being a PPC candidate isn’t easy, but it is empowering.

To finally take off the shackles of the UniParty and to fight for what you truly believe in. To advocate for ideas that will make this country a better place.

It’s worth the adversity. We can’t run from this fight, it will only make matters worse.

We must take this battle head on! For the sake of our children and grandchildren!

Apply today to join the fight for Canada’s future:

The application window closes on Sunday, May 7th.





Follow the PPC on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, Rumble, Odysee, Gab, and Telegram.

Follow Max on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Rumble, Gettr, and Telegram.

To make a donation with a cheque, please use this address: Suite 700, 1 Nicholas St, Ottawa, Canada, K1N 7B7. The cheque must be made payable to People’s Party of Canada.

To make an online donation, please visit our website:

Thank you!