British Columbia to decriminalise hard drugs to ‘end stigma’ amidst unsolvable addiction crisis
January 30, 2023 by Save Britain
Canada will temporarily decriminalise the possession of certain illegal drugs such as cocaine, MDMA, and opioids for personal use in British Columbia (B.C.) to help combat the province’s burgeoning drug abuse problem effective on January 31, 2023.
The exemption, which is a first in Canada, is intended to reduce the stigma associated with substance use and make it easier for people to seek help from law enforcement and other authorities.
The provision will be in effect from January 31, 2023 to January 31, 2026, and instead of punishing those found in possession of small amounts of exempt drugs, police will provide information on available health and social supports.
Broken behind the beauty
Canadians are proud of their country’s beauty and the generosity of their people. And, as you drive past rows of gleaming glass towers framed by the snow-capped Rockies and the Pacific waters of the Burrard Inlet, Vancouver is undeniably stunning — widely regarded as one of the world’s most ‘desirable’ cities to live in.
However, driving down the “drug city” dispels all such optimism.
Tents line the entrances to every building that hasn’t bribed them to leave or pleaded for police intervention. The goods they stole to satisfy their drug cravings litter the street, waiting for someone to buy them.
Addicts huddle in doorways, openly injecting, cooking, and smoking hard drugs like heroin, crack cocaine, crystal meth, and fentanyl — a lethal synthetic opioid 50 times stronger than heroin that has killed hundreds of thousands in North America. Others lie motionless on the ground, even in the rain, or stagger around in search of their next fix.
The crisis is about to worsen as a result of Canada’s ruling class’s disastrously misguided, woke politics.
Drug decriminalisation – is it the best decision?
Canada, which announced plans last year to put warning labels on fatty or salty foods as well as ‘poison in every puff’ warnings on cigarette packets, is more than happy to stigmatise drinkers, smokers, and obese people in the name of improving their health.
British Columbia, particularly Vancouver, has become a haven for liberal Canadians, who have elected a provincial government that believes society is too harsh on addicts.
They insist that decriminalisation will end the “shame” of drug use.
Anyone will be able to inject, smoke, snort, or swallow whatever they want, whenever they want — even if they want to sit on the swings next to children in a playground. And the police will have no authority to stop them as long as they have no more than 2.5 grammes of a drug in their possession.
Between 2016 and 2021, over 26,000 people died in Canada as a result of opioid-related overdoses. Overdose deaths have killed over 9,400 people in British Columbia since the province declared a public health emergency in 2016.
“Substance use is a public health issue, not a criminal issue,” said Sheila Malcolmson, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions in British Columbia, adding that the exemption will help the province combat the crisis.
Good news! For those still capable of waking up, there’s now a powerful ANTIDOTE to all the deadly propaganda pushed by “our free press”: Ed Dowd’s “Cause Unknown”
A book that tells the awful truth, and nothing but—and does it so compellingly that “our free press” is, with few exceptions, NOT attacking it!
Since They unloosed that evil countermeasure on all humankind two years ago, and called it a “vaccine” (and called it good), those pushing back against that deadliest of propaganda drives have used two kinds of evidence to make the case against the Big Lie that that witch’s brew is “safe and effective.”
On the one hand (and for the most part), there’s an overwhelming flood of abstract evidence—ever more and ever stronger evidence—that “vaccination” is not “safe and effective,” but extremely, unimaginably dangerous. Here are countless harrowing statistics, clearly showing dramatic upticks in “adverse events,” excess mortality, miscarriages and stillbirths, fatal heart disease in children and young people, an accelerating riptide of “rare” cancers, and all too many other signs of gathering catastrophe. And, all along, such dark data have complemented the expert prognoses offered by disinterested experts either noting, early on, the high likelihood of death and/or incapacitation caused by such “vaccination,” or, by and by, reporting dismal trends observed in their own practices.
Such abstract evidence, however troubling, has still been way too easy for a lot of people to blow off—as all too many naturally prefer to do, being jabbed themselves, and often having urged the needle straight into the tender arms of their own loved ones. (This does not refer to all those other “vaccinated” people who have not waved away such evidence, because they’ve never heard of it, “our free press” having kept them “safe” from it.) That disinclination to believe the worst—or, more precisely, try to picture it—recalls Stalin’s icy wisdom: “The death of one man is a tragedy. The death of a million is a statistic” (a quip that Gates, Schwab, Fauci, et al. have no doubt shared in high hilarity behind closed doors).
While such mere numbers bounce right off resistant minds, it’s not so easy to dismiss the other kind of evidence that those “vaccines” are killing, crippling and/or sterilizing millions—i.e., the ever-growing global archive of specific “sudden deaths,” those dead and maimed not swept into impersonal percentages, but named, their faces shown, and the suspicious circumstances of their deaths or injuries detailed, so that the deadly trends begun by “vaccination” now come clear. The mere percentages don’t show how many of the dead were (proudly) “vaccinated,” or—no less significant—how many have died, and are now dying, untimely deaths for no given reason (a mystery unprecedented in obituary practice in the US and elsewhere), or how many have died, and are now dying, of “rare” aggressive cancers diagnosed since early 2021, or how many children and young people—athletes included (or especially)—have died, and are now dying, of heart attacks, strokes, “blood clots,” cardiac arrest. Nor do the mere percentages give any sense of all the fatal car and airplane crashes, lethal falls, and other abnormal “accidents” week after week worldwide, involving single vehicles plowing into houses, bridge abutments, trees, parked cars, crowds of people.
In short, the mere percentages don’t give us the essential context for those countless deaths and injuries, just as they fail to honor all those dead, or as many of them as it’s possible for us to name. (As many as there are, there are, of course, far more whose “sudden deaths” have made no news, and whose obituaries go unread by anyone outside the stricken families.) It is this other, more detailed, specific evidence that can (and, ever more, now often does) break through the natural resistance of the “vaccinated”—which is why “our free press” keeps hysterically attacking it, and why we’re hearing ever more explicit and authoritative warnings that such dangerous “misinformation” may be deemed illegal by the state, or super-state, and sooner than we think.
In any case, both kinds of evidence are necessary to a proper understanding of what’s really going on, as those statistics verify, in different ways, what all those ever-growing galleries of the dead and injured show so clearly that no further psy-ops can effectively deny it, except among those who’ve been driven permanently crazy by the propaganda blitzkrieg of the last three years (on top of several other, prior propaganda drives that should have been debunked, but never were). In other words, we’re finally at the tipping-point, where only a shriveling minority continues to believe the government or media (the two being one), so that our drive to tell the truth is now more urgent than it’s ever been, and likely to be ever more effective, no matter what They do to black it out.
This is why “Cause Unknown”: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022, Ed Dowd’s new book, is so important now; for it’s a winning combination of both types of evidence. On the one hand, it conveys a poignant sense of just how many have “died suddenly” before their time these past two years, focusing especially on those who used to be, and (of course) ought to be, least likely to drop dead: e.g., young athletes, doctors, children, hale celebrities, scores of them whose names and faces are here powerfully remembered. And yet Dowd and his collaborators (including Gavin de Becker, author of the volume’s devastating afterwords) complement those tragic galleries with pertinent scientific data that demolishes the nitwit talking points deployed to (try to) blow the awful truth away. Especially helpful (to all those with minds still open) is the vast documentation gathered “off-site” (as it were) to certify the claims in “Cause Unknown.” Lest the nervous reader jump to Google for “the truth,” the authors offer this sensible advice:
“QR codes throughout these pages will take you to original source material so that you can confirm each report is real, each statistic well-sourced, each story all too true. Perhaps by the end of this book, you will come to see that much of the information reaching you day to day is carefully crafted by the media. The word media means ”in the middle of and between.” Indeed, the news media stands in the middle of and between you and people in power. Only when you know this can you decide for yourself what’s promotion, what’s propaganda, what’s marketing, and what is truth.”
Amen to that. As to the likelihood that “our free press” might somehow shoot down this key book, however, it’s worth noting—and celebrating—the media’s very telling silence on it. Whereas Died Suddenly, Stew Peters’ rather slapdash documentary, drew fierce denunciations by the score, “Cause Unknown” has drawn very little such brickbats (as far as I have seen), because “our free press,” or its masters, would prefer that no one know it’s even there, in hopes that it will quickly tumble down the memory hole.
So, please, let’s all make sure that doesn’t happen, by reading it, and recommending it to others far and wide, to speed the day when this abomination ends, and those who have survived it bring its authors to the justice they deserve, along with their multitudinous accomplices.
~Ω~
News from Underground by Mark Crispin Miller is a reader-supported, Substack publication. Please look him up on the net and subscribe to his work.
Open letter to Premier David Eby on the reinstatement of BC’s laid off nurses
By Arthur Topham
Editor – CaribooSentinel.ca
Dear Premier David Eby, et al,
Your stubborn refusal to face the reality that the Covid-19 scamdemic is DEAD and over with has to end. Your government’s unwarranted mis-treatment of our dedicated nurses who the NDP kicked out of the hospitals for refusing to take the killer jab also MUST end and these trained professionals be reinstated and compensated for loss of wages plus all the concomitant negative results of your government’s ill-conceived actions. Such treatment of BC’s nursing profession by you and your cohorts is more akin to the actions of communist nations like China not so-called Democratic nations like Canada.
Given all your past credits for having been the Executive Director of the BC Civil Liberties Association and an award-winning human rights lawyer all of those accomplishments fly in the face of such draconian, mean-spirited treatment of the nurses here in B.C.
I was personally in communication with you a few years back when the Ontario Civil Liberties Association was standing up for me during my own litigation over the issue of freedom of speech in Canada when we were requesting support from the BC Civil Liberties Association. As I recall trying to get you onboard was like pulling teeth with vice-grips.
For all the rhetoric and fanfare that the office of Premier provides you none of that matters in the long run. What truly matters is that you get your shit together and accept the fact that this heinous scamdemic you, Horgan, Henry, Hix and the rest of the NDP party have been colluding in with the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, Fauci and all the rest of the global elite psychopaths has to cease and common sense once again guide you all.
The party’s over David. The world is on to your scheming on behalf of those who want to murder the majority of humanity and turn the rest into genetically modified organisms. Best you make things right and reinstating the unemployed nurses would be a good first step on the road back to justice and freedom.
Kelowna Unvaxxed still on sidelines B.C.’s unvaccinated nurses feel ‘blamed, shamed and ignored’
Rob Gibson – Jan 11, 2023
As British Columbia’s beleaguered healthcare system continues to face critical staffing shortages, a former Kelowna General Hospital nurse forced off the job by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate wants back into the workforce.
Andrea Henders says she was a nurse for almost 12 years and was working at KGH when the provincial government announced it would be terminating all unvaccinated healthcare staff in October 2021.
“We’re trained, we’re hardworking, we’re experienced, we’re ready, we’re healthy, we’d love to go back to work,” Henders told Castanet Tuesday.
“We’re being ignored and shamed and blamed and pushed aside when we’re professional and ready to help.”
B.C. remains one of only two provinces in Canada that have continued to keep vaccine mandates in place for healthcare staff, the other being Nova Scotia. Ontario allows individual hospitals to determine their own approach to vaccine mandates, and several have kept them in place.
Premier David Eby recently announced a new program to pay for application and assessment fees for internationally trained nurses, along with thousands of dollars in support and bursaries for those who return to practice. The move also comes with faster processing times to speed up wait times and offer hope for a strained and understaffed B.C. healthcare system.
Henders, meanwhile, is frustrated.
“What about all the nurses that are sitting around ready to work? Why are you spending our tax dollars to bring in foreign-trained nurses, when there are perfectly experienced, skilled and ready to work nurses right here in B.C.”
In response to request for comment, the B.C. Ministry of Health said “in order to protect the province’s most vulnerable and the overall health-care system, COVID-19 vaccination requirements for health-care system workers continue to be in place.”
A large study published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine found people who received two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine had no protection against contracting the Omicron variant after 20 weeks. People who received two doses of Pfizer had just 9 per cent protection after 25 weeks. Moderna drops to 15 per cent after 25 weeks.
Booster doses increase protection significantly, but boosters are not required to be considered vaccinated in B.C.
Henders says getting information about the situation since losing her job has been a challenge. “It’s just like our voices are not being heard at all. We’re doing our darnedest to contact MPs and MLAs, Adrian Dix and Dr. Bonnie Henry, but we’re being completely ignored.”
The Ministry of Health’s statement says they are expecting another increase in the spread of COVID-19 this winter “the potential for another variant of concern to emerge remains a real concern.”
“Vaccine mandates protect vulnerable populations, including older and immunocompromised patients in hospitals, residents in long-term care facilities, as well as health-care workers and the overall health-care system. It is critically important to maintain this layer of protection for all of them.”
About 2,500 British Columbian healthcare workers, 900 in the Interior Health region, were terminated last year for being unvaccinated. The government has repeatedly emphasized that bringing back unvaccinated staff will not solve the staffing crunch.
“There’s so many of us and someone has to be their voice,” Henders said. “I paid good money and put in good time to become an RN and I cannot even work in my province when [B.C.] is in a dire staffing shortage and healthcare crisis right now. I would love to be helping, but nobody is listening.”
The BC Ministry of Health says they have no intention of changing its vaccine mandate and are in fact encouraging all health professionals to get vaccinated and boosted.
“In B.C. and globally, measures taken to combat the ongoing public-health emergency remain important. The trajectory of the pandemic over the next few months is uncertain as there is still significant spread of the COVID-19 virus in the province and around the world.”
Federal Court Grants Alberta Intervenor Status in 6 Challenges to Gun Ban
By Marnie Cathcart January 12, 2023
The Alberta government has received the Federal Court’s approval to intervene in six lawsuits related to federal proposed firearms legislation that would ban more than 1,500 models of firearms.
The province first announced it would seek intervenor status in ongoing legal actions on Sept. 26, 2022, to allow the province to advance both constitutional and non-constitutional legal arguments to protect the interests of Alberta’s estimated 340,000 plus licensed gun owners.
The Federal Court ruled on Jan. 11 that Alberta could intervene on non-constitutional issues, and the federal government did not oppose the application. Provinces have an automatic right to intervene on constitutional matters. It was the non-constitutional legal arguments that needed the approval of the court.
The legal actions, which were all filed separately, will be heard together April 11–20, and Alberta’s deadline to submit legal arguments to the federal court is early February.
6 Lawsuits
Cassandra Parker and K.K.S Tactical Supplies Ltd. v. Canada
Cassandra Parker is a married mother of four from Prince George, B.C., and a licensed firearm owner, hunter, angler, and target shooter who participates in competitive shooting sports competitions. She brought a lawsuit when the federal government banned seven firearms she legally purchased and declared them prohibited. Parker is also co-owner with her husband of a small firearms business, K.K.S. Tactical Supplies Ltd.
Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights et al. v. Canada
This legal action was brought by the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR), the country’s largest firearm owners’ advocacy group, representing the organization plus a number of individual applicants including a professional competitive sports shooter; a firearms safety instructor; the owners of an Alberta manufacturer of the SLR-Multi, a semi-automatic rifle used for hunting and sporting; Wolverine, a prominent Manitoba retailer and firearms distributor that employs 20 people in a small rural community and sells firearms for recreational shooting, competitive sports, and big game hunting; and Alberta Tactical Rifle, a Calgary firearms manufacturer.
John Hipwell v. Canada
Hipwell is a licensed firearms owner living in Virden, Manitoba, who owns five shotguns and rifles that he legally owned and acquired prior to May 1, 2020, when the government, by order in council, reclassified his property to be considered prohibited.
Michael Doherty et al. v. Canada
Doherty and a group of nine firearm owners have filed legal action stating that the federal government regulations prohibit firearms they use, affecting their sport shooting, hunting, and family bonding as well as pastimes.
Christine Generoux et al. v. Canada
Christine Generoux is a self-represented firearms owner living in Ottawa who has funded her legal application using GoFundMe. Joined by two others, Generoux works in water conservation and is joined by co-applicant John Perocchio, who collects historical arms and is legally licensed by the RCMP to own a fully automatic machine gun. Under the federal gun law, Perocchio’s semi-automatic firearms are banned.
Jennifer Eichenberg et al. v. Canada (AG)
Applicants include Jennifer Eichenberg, a married mother of three children and a high school teacher who has owned firearms legally for 12 years. She is an avid sports shooter now in the possession of previously legal firearms that have been prohibited by the federal government.
Leonard Walker
Leonard Walker, an assistant crown attorney with the province when the legal action was filed, has since returned to private practice as a criminal lawyer. He is a professor of criminal law and a range officer, and was president of a shooting sports organization and gun club. Three of his legally purchased guns have been declared prohibited weapons.
David Bot
David Bot is president of the Burlington Rifle and Revolver Club, which has an indoor shooting range. His legally owned firearms are now prohibited.
Frank Nardi
Frank Nardi is a competitive sports shooter and owner of the Montreal Shooting Club and the Montreal Firearms Recreational Centre, which sells firearms and related items. Nardi now has $200,000 worth of firearms, $65,000 worth of accessories, and $80,000 worth of specific ammunition that can no longer be legally sold.
Phil O’Dell
Phil O’Dell and his company import, distribute, and repair various firearms, alleging thousands of dollars in personal and business inventory loss as a result of the firearms ban.
Constitutional Jurisdiction
On Dec. 15, 2022, Alberta announced it would be making regulatory changes to take jurisdiction for firearm offences away from Ottawa.
Justice Minister Tyler Shandro wrote a letter to federal Justice Minister David Lametti on Dec. 15, advising the province would be exercising its “constitutional jurisdiction [to] protect firearms owners from an increasingly hostile federal government.”
As of Jan. 1, the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service was responsible for handling all charges involving the federal Firearms Act.
According to the Alberta government, there are questions of “significant public interest” regarding the lawful ownership of firearms, how the Criminal Code is interpreted, and the scope of the powers to make regulations being given to the federal government via Orders in Council.
Alberta intends to argue that “federal government’s legislation is an overreach of its jurisdiction and will infringe on the rights of the province’s law-abiding firearms community.”
Chief Firearms Officer Teri Bryant said these legislative changes will result in “responsible firearms owners losing their property without improving public safety.”
Albertans own the second highest number of firearms classified as prohibited or restricted by the federal government, said a province news release on Jan. 12. It is estimated that the federal firearms ban would target approximately 30,000 legally owned guns for confiscation.
Impact
Alberta has a thriving industry related to firearms, with 127 approved shooting ranges and more than 680 firearms-related businesses, according to the government. On average, 30,000 Albertans a year complete the mandatory firearms safety training that is required for a new firearms license (PAL). In 2021, 38,000 individuals completed the training, which is “a significant upward trend in legal gun ownership,” according to the province.
Alberta has additionally issued a protocol to the province’s Crown prosecutors for how to determine if charges should be laid to “prevent otherwise law-abiding individuals from facing criminal charges and potential time in jail,” Shandro said.
The protocol states it will not serve the public interest to prosecute a charge of possession of a banned firearm if three factors are met: that the gun was lawfully obtained prior to May 1, 2020; if the firearm was reclassified as prohibited on May 1, 2020; if the accused has not been charged with any other offences related to the possession or use of that firearm.
“Albertans should not automatically be considered criminals because they own a firearm that was legally purchased and possessed,” Shandro said.
In 2020, the federal government issued a ban on more than 1,500 models of previously legally purchased firearms. In October, the government put a freeze on the transfer and importation of handguns, which effectively bans handgun ownership in the country. Then last month, the government tabled sweeping last-minute amendments to Bill C-21, which is currently being debated by a House of Commons Committee.
Meanwhile Granny Annie Pistoff from Cowguts, Alberta impatiently awaits Trudeau’s arrival at her home!*
If passed, the bill will ban most semi-automatic shotguns and rifles—including many hunting shotguns and rifles purchased legally. The proposed amendments would also ban any gun that can hold a detachable magazine.
The bill and sweeping last-minute amendments have sparked an uproar from firearms owners and opposition parties, who say it targets hunters, farmers, ranchers, and sport shooters and involves thousands of popular, common makes and models of rifles and shotguns, most of which are unregistered and were legally purchased.
Shandro said the legislation “will criminalize hundreds of thousands of Canadians overnight—the majority of which reside in Western Canada.”
~Ω~
We hope you enjoy our coverage! As you are visiting us today, we’d like to ask you one question — How much do you think news media outlets actually impact your life?
…Probably more than you realize.
Life is full of decision-making. Even a bit of misinformation can lead to bad decisions and cause serious impacts. That’s why our team digs deep and reports truthfully to deliver reliable, complete, and accurate information that you need to make the right choices.
Unlike many other news outlets, The Epoch Times is not influenced by any government, corporation, or political party. We do not follow a predetermined narrative, inflame emotional tensions on issues, engage in sensationalism, or present only one side of the story.
We are funded by readers like you and our goal as an independent media outlet is to let YOU make up your mind on issues, no matter how heated.
Enrich your life with an Epoch Times subscription today. Your subscription will not only contribute to the revival of honest journalism, but will also provide unlimited access to truthful, uncensored news, plus a treasure trove of other online premium content, including Epoch TV. Start your trial for just $1 for 2 months. You won’t be disappointed!
Find us online and take advantage of this great and patriotic offer!
*Editor’s Note: Not all of the images in the article are connected to The Epoch Times. 🙂
Protesters invade government buildings, while the army protects them from the Federal police
By David Sorensen
Something unprecedented is happening in our world, and it will only get bigger, louder and stronger – it’s UNSTOPPABLE.
War on tyranny. War on censorship. War on the elites. War on the one world government. War on the realm of darkness. War on corruption.
We are seeing the first eruptions of something that will sweep the earth, like a tsunami of truth.
Brazil for example is exploding with nationwide protests against the election fraud, that removed president Bolsenaro by a deep state puppet who betrays the nation, in favor of globalists who ultimately want to steer the world to a one world government. For months now millions have been protesting in Brazil. The Indians even came out of the jungle to show their support for Bolsenaro.
Why is Bolsenaro so loved by the people? Because he stood firm as a lion against the tyrannical mandates during the pandemic.
He was severely smeared by the mainstream media, but kept defending the basic constitutional rights of the people. On January 8 a historically unprecedented protest exploded in Brazil, with countless protesters invading official buildings like the Supreme Court, the Senate, National Congress, and so on.
A highly significant event is that many police officers refused to obey the orders to arrest the protestors, and the military prevented the Federal police from making arrests.
This shows that the Brazilian military is on the side of the citizens who defend their country – something every true soldier signed up for: defend your country against foreign invaders. A soldier who allows his country to be destroyed by criminal globalists, is complicit in high treason, and betrays every mother, child, and father in the country that he swore to protect against foreign intruders.
There is a foreign invasion going in every country of the world, by criminal financial elites, who bribe government officials to surrender their nation to them, so they can become the unelected rulers of the entire world.
May the roar of the lion of justice become so loud that it will awaken the sleeping giant of righteousness across the world.
Share this around to inspire hope, and courage to others worldwide….
David Sorensen
~Ω~
StopWorldControl is a ministry by Hope for Humanity PMA. Our goal is to build a better world, by bringing truth and hope to people in every nation. Therefore we provide a platform for world leading scientists, lawyers, physicians, journalists and other experts that reveal critical information that humanity needs to be aware of. We reveal criminal activity and corruption in the high levels of our society, so the people can defend themselves against these criminal practices, and build a better world together. David Sorensen is the founder of Hope for Humanity and StopWorldControl David is a strong believer in a loving Creator who has a beautiful plan for our world, and who wants to fill us with the love that overcomes evil.
***Editor’s Note: As always it’s necessary for me to inform readers that I am currently under severe legal restrictions that prohibit me from being able to include links in the articles that I republish. David’s website can be found easily online if one wishes to get more information. His site is quite massive and covers most of the main issues of the day. Being able to publish without the Orwellian censorship laws that Canada has in place allows David to provide the reader with much more details on the machinations of these psychopathic pariahs who are doing the utmost to create their misconceived and deadly New World Order.
Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez and staff arrive at a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 10, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Editor’s Note:
The following article by Peter Menzies is like a breath of fresh air for every freedom-loving person who has been living under the stifling, suffocating, toxic clouds of government censorship laws for the past half a century here in Canada. Finally, it appears, we’ve reached the breaking point with all the commie correct “hate” laws that forbid Canadians from speaking their minds on issues of personal freedom and government malfeasance.
I must apologize to both Peter Menzies and to The Epoch Times for removing all the links from the article and for censoring particular words which my own legal restrictions don’t allow me to publish at this time.
Also, the assorted memes which I embellished the piece with other than the photo of Minister of Canadian Heritage Pablo Rodriguez, are mine and not those of the writer.
I highly recommend that readers unfamiliar with The Epoch Times contact them and subscribe to their hard-copy publication as well as their online one. A donation to the cause wouldn’t hurt either as running a publication business in this day and age, especially a hard-copy one, is no small feat.
Peter Menzies: Government’s Torquing of Survey to Show
Public Support for ‘Anti-Hate’ Legislation Deeply Troubling
January 6, 2023
Commentary
The next step in narrowing Canadians’ rights may be justified by a government survey that eliminated the views of anyone opposed to the government’s attempts to squelch freedom of expression.
In a hair-raising precursor of what’s likely to come in this year’s online harms legislation, it was revealed this week by Jamie Sarkonak of the National Post that Heritage Canada officials intentionally torqued a public survey measuring support for its “National Action Plan on Combatting Hate.”
They did so by inserting a screening question that disqualified anyone who didn’t agree that the government should crack down on speech of which it disapproves—including via legislation patrolling and scrubbing the pages of newspapers.
They did so by inserting a screening question that disqualified anyone who didn’t agree that the government should crack down on speech of which it disapproves—including via legislation patrolling and scrubbing the pages of newspapers.
Sarkonak obtained emails showing public servants noted that early survey responses were heavily opposed to proposals to create new laws or change existing laws to “add people or groups who fund, help, or take part in white supremacist activities to a formal list of white supremacist groups.” Also on the survey’s checklist was a proposal to create an “Anti-Racism law” to ensure that social media and traditional media (examples: television or newspapers) “follow standards that reject hate.”
Seventy-five to 80 percent of initial responses were from what public servants described as “non-allies.” In other words, regular Canadians, some of whom may have become aware of the survey after Quillette’s Jonathan Kay, who has a large social media following, tweeted about it. The remaining 20–25 percent—the allies—came overwhelmingly from Government of Canada IP addresses.
In other words, public servants dutifully supported the public servants trying to massage the views of the public they are supposed to serve.
And so, while the survey homepage continued to state that all Canadians were being asked for their opinions, the boffins inserted the question that “saved us (staff) well over 500 cases that should not have been included. … So it is helping us a lot,” according to Sarkonak’s report.
That comment came from an email sent in the second week of April following the move to “correct” the survey’s outcome by muting people who see things differently. By the time the survey closed May 8, more than 20,000 Canadians had participated in what appears to have been a process designed to produce a predetermined outcome. In other words, along the lines of how they handle these things in North Korea and not at all consistent with the principles underpinning a modern, liberal democracy. Hyperbole? I wish it were so.
This Liberal government is obsessed with creating menacing solutions to problems that are at best overstated and at worst pure figments of radical imaginations.
It introduced the Online Streaming Act to rein in companies such as Netflix despite the fact that in the decade following the debut of it and other online video stores, Canada experienced 80 percent growth in its film and television industry as demand for product erupted. For instance, the post-apocalyptic series “The Last of Us” will debut this week on Crave. Filmed in Alberta, it is the largest production in Canadian history and poured more than $200 million into the creative economy there. But the government felt it had to intervene on this and similar investments because it didn’t control it.
Facebook and Google have made commercial deals with most major media concerning the sharing of content, but the Liberals nevertheless introduced the Online News Actto force “web giants” to do what they have already done, except now they control it.
And now, using newly expanded definitions of hate and white supremacy—terms so loosely applied these days they were famously misused by notorious anti-Semite Laith Marouf in his government-funded media training contract to attack (“Zensored” ed.)—they are preparing to control the radical re-education of Canadians.
There is something deeply troubling about governments that manufacture evidence to suppress basic rights. And as has become smack-in-the-face obvious, Trudeau’s government is not going to use your parents’ definition of vile Nazi racist hate or hideous KKK-style supremacy to do so.
Nope, if you listen to the voices on the far left—as Trudeau does—hate and white supremacy are everywhere. These days there’s a supremacist under every bed, a hater in every closet. Your neighbour might even be one. Maybe there should be a snitch line.
As members of the military recently heard during an indoctrination, er, education session: “White supremacy is a global problem that has completely infected our nation,” Dr. Rachel Zellars told them. “It comes in all shapes and sizes, and cleans up real good,” she said, specifically referring to the Freedom Convoy protests, according to a National Defence recap.
It remains to be seen whether Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez will use his so-called survey to support his upcoming disinfection of Canadian minds.
But what you can take to the bank is that any new laws won’t apply to the disinformation emanating from either the Prime Minister’s Office or its “allies.”
And as for the bureaucrats who fudged the facts about how Canadians really feel, let’s just say they’ve put a whole new spin on the public service’s once noble promise to speak truth to power.
~Ω~
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Classical Homeopathy globules in vintage bottles and nature leaves
Editor’s Note: You can be damn sure that if the FDA goes through with their nefarious scheme that those in Canada who also rely on homeopathic medicines will also be directly affected. We know WHO controls the FDA so this is must one more direct attack up the people that must be stopped.
U.S. Food & Drug Administration Declares Homeopathy Illegal
The homeopathic drugs you rely on have been declared illegal by the FDA, meaning the agency can wipe them off the market whenever they wish. We must fight back. Action Alert!
This is the beginning of the end for homeopathy unless we do something about it. The FDA has completed their overhaul of homeopathy regulation, and it is as we feared: in the FDA’s view, all homeopathic products are illegal. This interpretation gives the agency the power to remove any homeopathic medicine it wants to, whenever it wants to. We must convey consumer outrage to Congress and the FDA if we want to save homeopathy.
Homeopathic drugs will not all disappear overnight. The FDA will probably adopt a similar playbook as the one they’re using to eliminate compounded medications, employing a strategy of “death by a thousand cuts.” Slowly but surely the agency will target and eliminate homeopathic medicines one by one until it is impossible for companies to stay in business. Clearing the market in one fell swoop would create headlines; picking off medicines one by one over time allows the agency to accomplish the same goal without drawing as much attention or generating as much outrage.
Why is the FDA doing this? The agency, in attacking homeopathy, is working, once again, to protect the bottom line of drug-makers. One of the most popular uses for homeopathic medicines is for allergies. But consider that the market for Zyrtec, one of the most popular antihistamine drugs, was valued at $1.675 billion in 2021; the market for antihistamine nasal sprays is just under $2 billion. The same applies to other conditions. There’s good evidence, for example, to suggest homeopathy is effective for rheumatoid arthritis and pain management. The market for rheumatoid arthritis drugs and pain management drugs is $60 billion and $73 billion, respectively. Homeopathy cuts into these massive profits. Big Pharma and the FDA, which gets its funding from Big Pharma, want to eliminate this competition.
The FDA says it will focus on a few product categories for enforcement: those with safety concerns, products with routes of administration other than oral or topical, products to treat “serious or life-threatening conditions,” products for vulnerable populations, and products with “significant” quality issues.
We noted previously that the agency went after injectable homeopathic medicines. This means that homeopathic mistletoe for injection is on the chopping block, a safe cancer therapy that has been used for years. Studies show that mistletoe can improve symptoms and quality of life, and reduce chemotherapy and radiotherapy side effects, including in pancreatic, lung, colorectal, and breast cancers.
OTC homeopathic medicines for cold and flu, teething, allergies, and other less serious conditions that can resolve spontaneously with or without treatment are likely safe for the time being. But the FDA also notes unequivocally that, although they outline a risk-based approach, no homeopathic medicines are safe. The agency states: “However, this guidance is intended to provide notice that any homeopathic drug product that is being marketed illegally is subject to FDA enforcement action at any time [emphasis added].”
Earlier this month, we reported that the FDA was preparing to release the final version of their terrible guidance document setting forth the agency’s approach to regulating homeopathic drugs. Substantively, the final version is unchanged from the draft. The guidance declares that all homeopathic drugs are illegal because:
1. Any homeopathic drug that has not been considered “generally recognized as safe and effective” (GRAS/E) is considered a new drug; 2. FDA has not determined that any homeopathic drugs are GRAS/E; 3. A new drug cannot be marketed unless it goes through the FDA’s approval process; 4. No homeopathic drugs have gone through FDA approval.
The FDA is, and has been, out of control. It approves dangerous, expensive drugs that don’t work, and works to eliminate your access to natural alternatives to those dangerous, ineffective, and expensive drugs. The FDA doesn’t even want you learning about the benefits of natural products, lest you are persuaded to opt for medicines that are not FDA-approved drugs.
Homeopathy is used by almost 7 million Americans, who the FDA apparently thinks are not equipped to make their own healthcare choices. We need to register consumer outrage by flooding the public docket with comments demanding that access to homeopathic products—which are overwhelmingly safe—be retained.
As 2022 draws to a close I see Canada’s Independent and Social Media along with the Conservative Party of Canada all abuzz over PM Justin Trudeau’s latest effort on the part of his globalist handlers to deliver a final blow to the New World Order’s inescapable Nemesis – the INTERNET.
Ads on Facebook by the Conservative Party of Canada, like the one below, are calling on Canadians to sign their petition and help them stop the Liberal’s blatant attempt to curb the tongues of the general public when they’re online before the final judgement call occurs and “the People” learn who is really behind all the madness the world’s been subjected to since the advent of the Great Scamdemic of 2020.
When I clicked on their petition ad to sign it a window opened stated the following:
STOP ONLINE CENSORSHIP
“We the undersigned call on the Liberal government to stop their C-11 censorship law that will curtail the freedom of expression Canadians enjoy online.
Whereas the Liberal Bill C-11 threatens to end the freedoms of Canadians on the internet in an open marketplace with a free exchange of ideas.
Whereas under this archaic system of censorship, government gatekeepers will now have the power to control which videos, posts and other content Canadians can see online.
Whereas Conservative Senators are keeping up the pressure in the Senate to abandon this ill-conceived censorship of freedom of expression online.
And whereas Conservatives will continue to fight back to defend the freedom of expression of Canadians, without which no other Charter rights are possible.
Therefore be it resolved that we call on this Liberal government to roll back their online censorship law C-11, and ensure Canadians’ right to freedom of expression online is protected.”
Of course for old radical’s such as myself who’ve been in the freedom of speech front line trenches for decades (and still am!) there’s a bit of irony (and possibly even hypocrisy) attached to the Conservative Party’s current love affair today with the concept of “freedom of expression”.
I can readily recall that it was under the dictatorship of the late Conservative PM Stephen Harper that the freedom of expression loving folks in Canada were already living in and suffering under a tyrannical, Orwellian dystopia thanks to former PM Pierre Trudeau and the Liberal’s draconian Sec. 13 “hate crime” legislation which they had surreptitiously slipped in under the wire immediately following 911 when the House was adjourning for the Christmas break.
Below is an image of many of the former victims of Canada’s undemocratic Censorship Laws.
While Sec.13 was obviously not the creation of the Conservative Party, PM Harper’s government had been going along with it up until the point where they finally realized that it was in fact a double-edged sword; one that could be used to silence not only critics of the left but also critics of the right. This occurred when a couple of media personalities of the day (who I’m not able to identify due to legal restrictions) had complaints laid against them by those who they were running down in the controlled media.
As a result of the conundrum the Conservatives found themselves in they were able to eventually repeal this specious piece of Orwellian legislation with the help of some Conservative Senators back in 2012.
Their fundamental error though at the time of repealing Sec.13 from the Canadian Human Rights Act was to fail to go one step further and repeal the more sinister and dangerous freedom-destroying legislation contained in the Canadian Criminal Code under Sections 318-320; ones which the Liberal government continues to embellish with further restrictions and undoubtedly plan to use against Canadian citizens in the times ahead.
It’s my hope that this time around the Conservative Party of Canada, should they gain a majority in the next federal election, will resolve this issue of freedom of expression once and for all and return to the common sense approach that existed in the former Canadian Bill of Rights which Conservative PM John Diefenbaker bequeathed to Canada on July 1, 1960. His words, spoken 62 years ago, still strike the hearts of all freedom loving Canadians today:
“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and for all mankind.”
History of Censorship in Canada
For those too young to remember and those still asleep at the wheel a decade ago it’s incumbent upon me to clarify the who, what and where of this former Censorship legislation known as Sec.13 and Sec. 318-320 of the CCC as well as the history of censorship in Canada from its nascent beginnings.
It’s my position, based upon over 20 years of research and 15 years of ongoing litigation, that Canada’s judicial system was infiltrated and co-opted by globalist interests operating in Canada since as early as 1919. Of course such an assertion will automatically be met with a loud hue and cry of “preposterous! outrageous!” followed immediately by much hand-wringing and declamations of “hatred” and “racism” and further punctuated, dramatized and broadcast across the nation via the Controlled Mainstream Media. So be it. It doesn’t detract one iota from the facts.
All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past 55 years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the globalist elites lining up and vying for intervenor status. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it was themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.
One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the world’s globalists in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Chancellor Hitler was saying about the International banking cartel and their control of Germany’s own beleaguered nation and so, as a result of their growing paranoia, the provincial government of Manitoba, (of all places) passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”, the premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression in Canada.
Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code which reads, “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.
When WW2 ended the work of the globalists began in earnest. Their first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda”. By 1953 we find that the globalists in Canada were already diligently pursuing efforts toward this same end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Canadian Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.
Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit in 1965 when they were finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau to appoint a special (interest?) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.
Surprisingly (not) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” was fully furnished with a gaggle of legal beagles that included one notable lawyer who would become instrumental in aiding the globalists in their relentless quest for censorship laws.
This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.
The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code.
Only now that the true history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we allowed to search for and see the original, unadulterated script that was so cleverly designed by the NWO forces of the day and it turns out to be a program of diabolic, treacherous, political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with an atheistic, elitist, macabre vision of a New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.
It was back in the mid-1970s when the globalists began lobbying Ontario’s then Deputy Attorney General, F.W. Callaghan and putting pressure on him to silence one of their critics, a rather vociferous fellow by the name John Ross Taylor who had come up with the novel idea of leaving telephone messages on the phone lines of those who he was critical of. The recipients of Ross’s unwelcome expressions were demanding of the Federal Department of Justice the inclusion of speech-restricting legislation that removed the need for “willfulness” or fair comment based on public interest. In that way they could circumvent having to pay their own legal costs which would, under the new law, be off loaded on to the unsuspecting Canadian taxpayer instead.
According to the history of Section 13 by Marc Lemire, an advocate and fighter for freedom of speech during PM Harper’s reign, he states, “In 1976, the Federal Government was looking at a larger Act for employment issues and the provision of federally regulated services. This Act eventually would end up with the innocuous sounding name: the Canadian Human Rights Act. Although no other section of the CanadianHuman Rights Act covered speech, it was not a problem for the Federal government to capitulate and slip in an extra section to satisfy Ontario’s Attorney General’s lust to silence John Ross Taylor and his home-based answering machine.”
“In 1977Bill C-25 or the “Canadian Human Rights Act” was passed by the House of Commons on July 14th. Contained within it under the sub-title of “Hate messages” was Section 13 which read:
13(1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
As Lemire goes on to state:
“Only a few years after the law was enacted, Mr. Callaghan finally got his wish and John Ross Taylor became its first victim, with the Canadian Human Rights Commission itself and several globalists as the complainants.
“Since the law was first enacted, two major changes were made to Section 13. These changes fundamentally shifted the original intent of the legislation, and turned Section 13 into an instrument to financially and morally punish those with politically incorrect views.
“The first change to the legislation occurred on May 15, 1998, when Royal Accent was given to Bill S-5 (1998), which added a new penalty provision to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Bill S-5 added Section 54 to the Canadian Human Rights Act, and allows the Human Rights Tribunal to impose a financial penalty of up to $10,000. On top of the fines, Section 54 also gave the fanatical Tribunal the ability to impose penalties of up to $20,000 as so-called ‘special compensation’.
“According to the background section of Bill S-5, these penalties were added ‘as a response to the rising incidence of hate crimes around the world. The government believes that stronger measures are needed to deter individuals and organizations from establishing hate lines. It hopes to accomplish this by allowing victims of such lines to apply for compensation and subjecting offenders to financial penalty.’
“The second change occurred in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. Sadly, this legislation equated non-violent politically incorrect words – which are covered by Section 13 – with terrorism and concerns of national security. Under the guise of Bill C-36 – Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act, Section 13 was expanded to cover “a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet.”
This change, gave the power to the Canadian Human Rights Commission to censor the internet and harass Canadians with views that the Rights Fanatics disagree with.
Closer to Home
Of itself censorship is nothing new having been around since Cicero’s day. It didn’t become established to any degree until after the middle of the 15th Century when Johannes Gutenberg invented the movable-type printing press and set off the Gutenberg revolution. Once the technical means were in place allowing mass communication to occur the inevitable pursuit of controlling the narrative also appeared and by the turn of the 20th Century the globalists of the day had already firmly established their worldwide news networks. They’re still with us today and the times we now live in are, in many ways, but a reflection of the effects that the controlled media has produced upon the planet over the past 125 years.
Having arrived on this 3rd rock from the sun in 1947 I was in a sense a Johnny-come-lately in terms of understanding how the mass media was structured even though by the time I left high school in 1965 Marshall McLuhan’s Gutenberg Galaxy had already been on the market for three years. My time spent at Simon Fraser University from its opening in the fall of ’65 until I left with my Teaching Certificate in hand was the precursor to what would eventually turn out to be a rather radical life spent within McLuhan’s famed galaxy.
I didn’t encountered the malevolent effects of censorship until I reached my 50th year. It was only then I finally realized that if a Canadian citizen wishes to express themselves in a free and open manner that the heavy hand of Big Brother can and will appear to silence you. My reaction at the time to having my letters to the editor of the local community newspaper the Quesnel–Cariboo Observer censored by my then employer School District #28 set me on a new path that would eventually lead up to the present moment and the issue now at hand.
Those who know me and my previous published works since I began publishing my own newspaper The Radical back in June of 1998 will understand perfectly well what I’m talking about when I state that ever since I first encountered head on the diabolic, Big Brother, Communist threat to individual freedom of expression back in 2007 the issue of CENSORSHIP has over shadowed my life’s work.
The legal consequences alone, after spending over a decade in and out of the Provincial and Supreme Court systems, have left an indelible mark on my ability to speak TRUTH to the power brokers who, since the onset of their transparently overt 2020 Covid attack upon humanity, have now turned the socio-political world into a farcical free-for-all with no holds barred.
Front Page News for November 23, 2012
Concluding Remarks
“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, Shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and Beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.” ~ Jesus Christ, St. Matthew Ch. 7, vs 24 -27
The premise of my argument that Canada’s Legacy media or MSM is, and always has been, an integral part of the NWO’s overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the Canadian people stands undefeated to this day for the simple reason that the globalists will never debate the issue in an open public forum as they’re fully aware it’s much easier to just use the power of their press to vilify and smear anyone who exhibits the testicular audacity to openly challenge their verifiable culpability in every criminal deception they’ve been involved in over the past century and longer. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these globalists to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians, be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s domestic and foreign policies.
It’s also my ardent contention that the Censorship template for Canada’s anti-free speech legislation, falsely labelled “Hate Propaganda” was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield which the globalists could then use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions, all of which were designed to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics.
Back during the period of my legal battles with the Canadian Human Rights Commission then Conservative PM Stephen Harper was the globalist’s Trojan Horse de jure and front man in this deliberate, ongoing, slow motion coup to capture the nation’s political and legal systems. His only saving grace was to have not stood in the way of repealed the Sec. 13 law before his tenure ended.
When we go back in history and retrace the steps these Machiavellian interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are exhibiting toward the actions of the current Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when it comes to his relentless, mean-spirited attacks upon our truckers, our clergy and our nurses and doctors.
Those despicable actions, exacerbated to the nth degree by his psychotic obsession with wanting to jab every living soul in the country, from pregnant mothers and new born babies to the aged, with the World Health Organization and Fauci’s poisons that are now decimating the world’s populations everywhere make it abundantly evident that our nation is under serious attack by these foreign globalist insiders who are manipulating the Prime Minister of the country to commit treasonous acts designed to obliterate the people’s fundamental rights and freedoms.
These examples coupled with his outright phony posturing and endless display of abject obeisance to the wishes of international globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum of which he’s a charter member and one of the more fanatical and embarrassing examples of what a true Statesman ought not to be all point to the unequivocal conclusion that the nation has been betrayed by the Liberal Party of Canada and it MUST BE REPLACED in the most expedient manner as possible.
A final reminder for readers is Sec. 2b of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which clearly delineates our fundamental right to freedom of expression:
Sec.2b(2): Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press andother media of communication.
As fate would have it my own legal case was destined to be the test case for the globalists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent would undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who might also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Orwellian legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.
Just as the great parable of Jesus Christ shown above regarding the foolish man who built his house upon the sand has come down through history so too has the foolish attempt by those who labour for the Satanic forces to build a globalist house of invisible governance upon the sands of deception, usury and an insatiable lust for power and control over their fellow mortals.
Now that the rains of the peoples’ outrageous indignation and the floods of perceived injustice and repression of personal freedoms and the winds of Truth and Freedom are beginning to beat with greater and greater intensity upon the once mighty and powerful House of the New World Order (thanks to the miracle of the Internet), the underpinnings of this deceptive, age-old hoax are giving way and, if the people continue to unite and persevere in their staunch resistance to and abolition of all the censorious “Hate Propaganda” laws now being used against them, then soon and with great relief and thankfulness, will come the inevitable fall of this House of Horrors followed by a new beginning for those who want only peace and love and justice and brotherhood to reign supreme.
