Dr. Hoffe

Paragons of Ethical Medicine Attacked by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC

/ Webmin / 5 Comments

Paragons of Ethical Medicine Attacked by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC


By
Dr. Matthew Evans-Cockle

Left unchecked, the arbitrary power of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC threatens the health and well-being of all British Columbians as well as the core values of Canadian democracy.

A handful of headstrong, and ethically courageous, British Columbian doctors have stood up and voiced their concerns about the potential harms associated with our provincial COVID-19 policies. Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater have all run afoul of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC. In the interest of brevity and clarity, the reflections that follow will be confined to a single case—that of Dr. Charles Hoffe, who was one of the first, if not the first, BC physician to be censured by the College.

According to the Vancouver Sun, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has issued a citation for Dr. Charles Douglas Hoffe, alleging that his “online comments contravened the standards of the Health Professions Act including the Canadian Medical Association’s code of ethics and professionalism.” The Vancouver Sun article further relates that Doctor Hoffe is accused of uttering a number of public health heresies.

The heresies of Doctor Charles Hoffe, we are told, are many and grievous. First, he has suggested that the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines may cause “microscopic blood clots.” Such microscopic blood clots, he has allegedly stated, might contribute to severe neurological issues as well as a wide range of other serious harms. On this matter, the College is unfazed by the unprecedented numbers and varieties of harms reported in the world’s most prominent and widely recognized reporting systems, such as the American VAERS, UK’s Yellow Card, European Medicines Agency’s EudraVigilance, and the World Health Organization’s VigiSafe systems. A second heresy for which Dr. Hoffe is reproached, is his suggestion that “vaccinated persons can cause harm to unvaccinated persons.” The College appears steady in their resolve to censure Hoffe on this matter, unshaken by the growing body of evidence that mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission of COVID-19 or its variants, or apparently reduce the occurrence of severe COVID-19. But the third, and perhaps greatest of Dr. Hoffe’s heresies is his suggestion that “ivermectin is an advisable treatment for COVID-19!”(1)

Health Canada historically and presently supports the use of approved medicines such as ivermectin for off-label indications at the discretion of prescribing physicians if there are compelling reasons why the doctors believe they may be helpful to their patients. The College’s attack on this statement is particularly ludicrous given its confirmation by no less an authority than Dr. Tess Lawrie, the director of Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, UK. With respect to the advisability of ivermectin in treating COVID-19, Dr. Lawrie has conducted a meta-analysis of 15 trials, following the gold-standard Cochrane protocol. While citing both the well-known safety profile and very low cost of ivermectin, Dr. Lawrie’s meta-analysis concludes that with the aid of this essential medicine “large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible” and, that “[u]sing ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease.”(2)

As though Hoffe’s fantastically reckless claim that “ivermectin is an advisable treatment for COVID-19”, were not offensive enough… As though it were not absolutely intolerable that Dr. Hoffe’s assertion is now supported by not just one, but multiple meta-analyses(3)… As if this weren’t already dreadful enough, the allegedly off-his-rocker doctor stands accused of suggesting that people wishing to make use of this treatment disregard its prohibition by Public Health! If Public Health refuses to make this potentially life-saving and inexpensive treatment available—a treatment with an unparalleled safety profile, a treatment already administered billions of times all around the world, a treatment with incredibly few adverse events recorded after over 40 years of use—Dr. Hoffe, I say—echoing the righteous, thundering indignation of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC—has had the unmitigated gall to suggest that the public might be justified in obtaining it “from animal feed stores” where it is also available.

But all kidding aside, to an increasing number of gravely concerned British Columbians, the disciplinary actions undertaken by The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC against Dr. Hoffe and his fellow physicians for identifying issues of concern regarding the COVID mandates and recommendations pronounced by Public Health authorities, appear arbitrary, vindictive, and against the public interest. To these citizens, the College appears to be aggressively persecuting highly qualified and conscientious medical professionals for acting according to the dictates of their conscience, knowledge, and sworn oath to do no harm. These doctors have felt compelled to comply with their duties to patients and the community by voicing science-based concerns about potential harms associated with the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccine, and by drawing attention to the benefits of early treatment. For casting doubt upon the reliability of the Public Health authority’s COVID-19 policies, they have drawn the ire of the BC College, yet for many British Columbians, these courageous physicians embody the spirit of both ethical medicine and social responsibility.

If the actions taken against these doctors by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC are contrary to the spirit of ethical medicine and the dictates of a socially responsible conscience, they are also contrary to the spirit of the law in Canada. According to the Canadian concept of law, a citizen cannot be both accused of a crime and also stripped of the ability to answer the accusation. When the College suspends a doctor’s license it thereby prevents that doctor from earning income. Without income, such doctors will be unable to effectively pay the legal fees required to mount an adequate defense in answering the accusations made against them.

The punitive actions undertaken by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC are made even more outrageous by their complete lack of reasonable grounds. Again and again, the people of BC have heard from Interior Health, Public Health, and the Minister of Health, that their shared goal is to ensure the safety of British Columbians. To this end, they have prohibited physicians and other healthcare providers from publicly expressing opinions that contradict official Public Health recommendations and orders. To contradict these recommendations, they say, is to put people’s lives at risk by encouraging vaccine hesitancy. And yet, time and again, to compel uninformed or poorly informed compliance, our public health authorities have provided misleading, erroneous, or inadequate information to justify orders and recommendations. Assertions concerning the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines have been disproven. Assertions concerning the safety and efficacy of mask wearing and social distancing have been disproven. Similarly, assertions by Public Health authorities concerning the safety and efficacy of lockdown measures have been disproven. While falsely touting the benefits of these mandates, Public Health authorities have been silent or misleading about the risks. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has censured doctors for attempting to prevent harm by providing patients and others with some of the information needed to make informed decisions about COVID-19 treatment.

At this stage, we should all know that the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission. Indeed, Pfizer executive Janine Small has admitted, before a European Union parliamentary hearing, that Pfizer did not test the vaccine for preventing transmission of COVID-19 prior to it being made available to the public. U.S. CDC director Rochelle Walensky has publicly admitted the vaccines can’t prevent transmission.(4)

And viral immunologist Dr. Byram Bridle has written, “the current COVID-19 vaccines fail to induce what we call ‘sterilizing immunity’. This means that vaccinated individuals can still get infected with SARS-CoV-2, potentially become ill, and potentially transmit the virus to others.”(5)

At this stage, we should all know that not only do the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines not prevent hospitalization or death but that vaccine adverse event reporting systems around the world are showing higher rates of mortality for these mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines than for any other vaccines in history. Looking at the US VAERS, the UK Yellow Card, and the World Health Organization VigiAccess systems, in less than three years more vaccine injuries have been reported in connection with the COVID-19 vaccines than from the combined sum of all other vaccines administered over the past three decades.

Once upon a time, members of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC might have believed there were adequate scientific grounds for promoting the mRNA COVID-19 genetic vaccines as safe and effective. Now, however, it has been made abundantly clear, and that for a good long time already, that no such grounds exist. With over 35,000 COVID-19 vaccine deaths and over 2,400,000 adverse events reported in the US VAERS alone, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC should be pulling out their bullhorns and shouting from the rooftops: “these genetic vaccines are NOT safe, and they are NOT effective!” Instead, the College has prohibited physicians from expressing concerns about the safety and efficacy of these genetic vaccines on the grounds that to express such concerns puts people at risk by encouraging vaccine hesitancy. It appears patently obvious, however, that when we set about administering any new treatment, it is precisely by prohibiting physicians from sharing their opinions—as qualified, experienced, and ethically conscientious medical professionals—that we put people at risk.

The College’s disciplinary actions clearly prohibit or impair not just those targeted, but all physicians from carrying out their professional and ethical duties to ensure provision of individualized health care which includes providing information, specialized knowledge and careful advice about the risks and benefits of recommended medical products and about alternative treatments. The disciplinary actions by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC also violate our physicians’ protected rights including rights to: work and earn income as physicians; due process; remedies for rights violations; freedom of expression; and their right to participate in governance and decision making.

All of these rights, which the BC College is violating through their autocratic disciplinary actions, are protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Now, discussions of Charter rights and freedoms tend to be inconclusive, because it is difficult, on the basis of the Charter alone, to reach a useful end or stable determination. There is a simple reason for this. From a legal perspective, the Canadian Charter is a weak constitutional document. It is weak in the sense that it does not, on its own, provide clear and definitive guidance on the general matters with which it is concerned. This does not mean, however, that no such guidance is possible. On the contrary, the relatively weak guidance provided by the Charter can be reinforced through reference to another body of law.

It is important, and also very helpful, to recognize that the Canadian Charter can and should be interpreted in accordance with the many international human rights treaties signed by Canada. When it comes to compliance with treaty obligations, one might say the entire world is watching; or to quote from section 8 of the Canadian “Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament”, “Under international law, a treaty creates international legal obligations for Canada.”

By referring to international human rights treaty law it is possible to throw much needed light on some of the more obscure, ambivalent, and vague sections of the Charter. Our physicians’ rights—the rights which are being violated by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC—are protected under the Charter and they are further protected under international human rights law treaties to which Canada is a party. The guidance these treaties provide is definitive and clear and the protection they provide is unquestionable—for these treaties are binding upon Canada. These include, but are not limited to, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

In addition to stripping physicians of Charter rights and freedoms, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC’s disciplinary proceedings also deprive patients of their essential rights to informed consent to medical treatment, freedom from coercion or force to accept a medical treatment not voluntarily chosen, and freedom from non-consensual medical or scientific experimentation. As ought to be widely known, these last two rights are absolute. They cannot be restricted under any circumstances, including those pertaining to public health emergencies. These laws are, in fact, part of the peremptory right to freedom from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In addition, the illegitimate disciplinary actions undertaken by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC have had a chilling effect on non-targeted BC physicians whose silent acquiescence to harmful covid mandates has likely harmed hundreds of thousands of patients in this province alone. This is not an abstract issue that only concerns lawmakers and stuffy bureaucrats; it is a deeply personal crisis that affects Canadians living in major metropolitan centres across the country as surely as it reaches into the heart of rural townships throughout the Southern, Interior and Northern reaches of B.C.

“It is no great stretch to imagine that many of those who have lost loved ones subsequent to vaccination, and a great many more who have been injured, are now calling out for justice. Far from wishing to see BC doctors punished for speaking out, a great many of these might wish to see the Colleges rebuked and disciplined—if not dismantled—for prohibiting their doctors from providing them with the responsible medical counsel required to make properly informed risk benefit analyses. By effectively muzzling BC physicians, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has deprived British Columbians of their legal right to informed consent. This, in turn, has led to an inevitable desire for justice among the vaccine injured and bereaved.”

It is no great stretch to imagine that many of those who have lost loved ones subsequent to vaccination, and a great many more who have been injured, are now calling out for justice. Far from wishing to see BC doctors punished for speaking out, a great many of these might wish to see the Colleges rebuked and disciplined—if not dismantled—for prohibiting their doctors from providing them with the responsible medical counsel required to make properly informed risk benefit analyses. By effectively muzzling BC physicians, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has deprived British Columbians of their legal right to informed consent. This, in turn, has led to an inevitable desire for justice among the vaccine injured and bereaved.

The broader legal context and consequences of the BC College’s autocratic policies and punitive actions against Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater are of enormous importance. With the College’s persecutory proceedings against these physicians, we are witness to non-consensual and arbitrary imposition of orders, arbitrary punishment, and arbitrary withdrawal of privileges. This is not only contrary to the Spirit of the law in Canada—it is an outright attack on Canadians’ most fundamental participatory and democratic societal values. The College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has dealt a terrible blow to doctors’ freedom to practice ethical medicine in the province of British Columbia. If the College’s arbitrary punishment of Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater is allowed to stand, it will set a precedent that threatens the constitutionally protected societal values of all Canadians, while destroying the right to provide and receive personalized healthcare in BC. If these doctors’ ethical actions on behalf of their patients are not vindicated, it will hamper the ability of all BC doctors to provide honest and informed consultations that are in the best interests of their patients, because these doctors, in turn, will fear that their own ability to practice medicine may be threatened if they do so.

In closing this discussion of ethical medicine and the ill-advisement of autocratic authority in matters of public safety, it may be helpful to remind ourselves of a fundamental principle of human rights recognized the world over: health professionals are under a legal obligation “to document and report torture and ill-treatment in all contexts(6).”

Declaring a pandemic does not mean that authorities and health professionals no longer need to respect the rule of law and the rights and freedoms of individuals. On the contrary, even if a domestic law were to be changed, it cannot be used as an excuse to suspend rights guaranteed under treaties signed by Canada.

Highly qualified and ethically conscientious medical practitioners, doctors willing to risk their own livelihoods in order to advocate for the well-being of their patients, are a precious commodity. When doctors have science-based concerns about potential harms to their patients, they must be not only allowed, but encouraged to speak out. To punitively restrict and silence doctors, to prevent them from acting according to their conscience, to prevent them from fulfilling their fiduciary duty towards their patients is recklessly poor policy. In light of the above, and in compliance with its statutory and ethical duty to the people of this province, I urge the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC to immediately withdraw all proceedings against Doctors Hoffe, Malthouse, Nagase, and Sclater. I further urge the College to take whatever measures are necessary to enable these doctors’ return to practicing medicine. The value of these doctors’ principled stand against the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC’s autocratic imposition of ill-advised public-health policy cannot be overstated. Exemplary embodiments of the spirit of ethical medicine and social responsibility, these physicians are to be applauded for the tremendous efforts they have made on behalf of all British Columbians.


~Ω~

Contact: Dr. Cockle dr.evans.cockle@gmail.com


Footnotes:

1 An overview of the current state of research on ivermectin use in the treatment of COVID-19: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Oldfield-Ivermectin-Treatment-of-COVID-19.pdf

2 Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP4. Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines. American Journal of Therapeutics 28(4):p e434-e460, July/August 2021. | DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402

3 Kory, P., Meduri, G.U., Iglesias, J., Varon, J., Berkowitz, K., Kornfeld, H., . . . Marik, P.E. (2021). Review of the emerging evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ivermectin in the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Am J Therapeutic. 28, 299-318. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/06000/Review_of_the_Emerg ing_Evidence_Demonstrating_the.4.aspx?WT.mc_id=HPxADx20100319xMP

4 https://www.audacy.com/kmox/news/national/cdc-director-says-vaccines-are-not-preventing-transmission

5 https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021-06-15-Children-and-COVID-19-Vaccines-full-guide_-FINAL.pdf (page 29).

6 …based on the obligation of States under international law, as well as the ethical obligations of health professionals.” (see the Istanbul Protocol – Manual on the Effective Investigation and Documentation of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, June 2022 Edition at para. 603)

Whole Grains of Truth

/ Webmin / 1 Comment

[***Editor’s Note: At times the wonderful world of social media can be a tad confusticating. The recent issue surrounding the case of Dr. Hoffe is a good example of what can happen when otherwise well-meaning, conscientious supporters send out information to the net that’s not fully correct and which ends up spawning confusion as to what’s actually going on.

Shit happens like this all the time and I’m just as guilty of it as anyone else, especially when one is working in the field and the field is now so immense that it’s easy to trip over the keys on one’s pc and send something out without having fully checked it out.

Setting the record straight is always helpful, even in retrospect and that’s what this post is for.

I received the following email below from Dr. Hoffe’s lawyer, Michael Alexander, last evening and I’m posting it and the original statement that ended up slipping into the Rumour Mill.]

Re: Status of Dr. Hoffe’s case

Hi Arthur,

I’m sorry to be so delayed in getting back to you. I’ve been very wrapped up in getting the adjournment for Charles, which was successful.

Here is the original statement, which I had misplaced on my computer. It’s the same as below, but it contains a paragraph that Vaccine Choice excluded. I’m sure this is too late to go press. But, if you wanted to report on the latest news, which you may done already, it would be that we did get the adjournment, and I will putting out a press release shortly about what this means going forward.

Best wishes,

Michael
Michael Alexander,MA, JD, LLM

LITIGATIONWORKSMerchandise Building155 Dalhousie Street,

Suite 410Toronto, 

ON M5B 2P7

Direct: 416-318-4512

Re: Status of Dr. Hoffe’s case

An unidentified party sent out an e-mail regarding Dr. Hoffe’s case on the weekend, and it has caused considerable misunderstanding and harm. Dr. Hoffe and I have reviewed the e-mail, and Dr. Hoffe has authorized me to correct misapprehensions resulting from it.

First, I have not missed any deadlines for Dr. Hoffe or any of my other physician clients. Dr. Hoffe was scheduled for a hearing at the College of Physicians in BC, which was to begin on February 12th. However, I experienced a serious adverse health event just before Christmas and ended up in the ER, and I am still recovering from the episode. Shortly after being discharged from the hospital, I notified the College that I would need an adjournment of the hearing on health grounds. At that time, all filing deadlines were provisionally suspended. Subsequently, I provided a medical note to the College in pursuit of the adjournment. Later today, February 7th, my external counsel in BC will appear at a College case conference to formally present the request for a re-scheduling of Dr. Hoffe’s hearing.

Second, Dr. Hoffe was charged under the old Health Professions Act. It is by no means clear at this point that the College has a right to try him under the new legislation, with its enhanced penalties. Those who suggest otherwise have jumped the gun.

Third, this e-mail was brought to my attention on Saturday evening when I attended the dinner for the Justice for the Vaccinated Conference in Toronto. During the pre-dinner reception, I learned that an attendee was spreading false information about my conduct of the Hoffe case and other physician cases on my docket. I had a meeting with her at the end of the evening in the presence of conference organizers. We had a professional and civilized conversation, and I was able to disabuse her of her mistaken views. However, another e-mail was soon circulated stating that we had been engaged in a “fight.” That is not true. The matter was resolved amicably. 

Finally, some of the people who circulated the original e-mail know me or have social media connections with me. They could easily have reached out to me for clarification. If they had, this whole affair, which has been damaging for me and Dr. Hoffe, might been stopped in its tracks. Social media is a great way for us to share information and remain united in our efforts, but when it degenerates and becomes a rumour mill, as in this case, it harms the very people we are trying to help. Please think twice before tweeting, texting or posting unsubstantiated claims. 

Michael Alexander, JD

~Ω~

Hearing of BC Doctor Who Spoke Out Against COVID Protocols Postponed by Regulatory College

/ Webmin / Leave a comment

A sign for a COVID-19 vaccination clinic run by Vancouver Coastal Health in Richmond, B.C., on April 10, 2021. (The Canadian Press/Jonathan Hayward)
By Jeff Sandes
February 12, 2023Updated: February 12, 2023

[Editor’s Note: It’s with great relief that news of Dr. Hoffe’s hearing before the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC has been postponed and I want to thank all the good folks across the nation who were so conscientiously quick in firing off letters of support for Charles Hoffe to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of BC. BIG THANKS also to Jeff Sandes and the Epoch Times for running his story.

Please note that the images in the body of the article and any urls attached to them are mine and not those of Epoch Times.]

Hearing of BC Doctor Who Spoke Out Against
COVID Protocols Postponed by Regulatory College

By Jeff Sandes

The first doctor in British Columbia to face a disciplinary hearing in front of the province’s College of Physicians and Surgeons related to COVID-19 protocol has had his review postponed.

Lytton, B.C. before the fire

Dr. Charles Hoffe from Lytton, B.C., was scheduled to begin his 10-day hearing before a college discipline committee panel on Feb. 13, but his lawyer, who spent several weeks in hospital recently, had applied multiple times to postpone the hearing so he could prepare. After a case conference on Feb. 7 and 8, the panel notified Hoffe and his lawyer of the adjournment on Feb. 9. A new date for his hearing has not yet been publicly announced.

Hoffe says he’s relieved.

“We initially asked for this adjournment seven and a half weeks ago, but the college was so reluctant to give it that they’ve literally approved it four days before the trial starts,” he told The Epoch Times.

“Clearly, they have done this with great reluctance. But you know, time and truth go hand in hand, and with every passing week, more and more scientific evidence validates everything they have accused me of, showing they are wrong. So they clearly need to drop all of these absurd charges against me and all of the other doctors, and they need to go back to [being] the guardians of medical ethics, which is what they’re supposed to be.”

The citation listed three examples, with more left unnamed. Hoffe is accused of recommending ivermectin as a treatment for COVID and where to get it without a prescription; saying COVID vaccines can cause harm including neurological injuries, female infertility, and even death not recognized by public health; and expressing that vaccinated people can cause harm to those who remain vaccine free.

Support

Many of Hoffe’s supporters wrote to the college in recent weeks to show their opposition to any disciplinary action against Hoffe.

In a citation issued to Hoffe in February 2022, the college alleged he “contravened standards imposed under the Health Professions Act, including but not limited to the Canadian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics and Professionalism by publishing statements on social media and other digital platforms that were misleading, incorrect or inflammatory about vaccinations, treatments, and public measure relating to COVID-19.”

Former police officer Ivan DeSilva used to work with the college when he was a detective with the Vancouver Police Department’s Sex Crimes and Child Abuse units, handling many of their investigations.

DeSilva now hosts his “A Biblical Frame” podcast. He has interviewed Hoffe on his podcast, having previously met him, and as a supporter he wrote a letter to the college speaking to Hoffe’s professionalism and integrity.

See article HERE

He says the college now operates with a different mandate than when he was with the Vancouver Police Department.

“When I wrote this letter, I basically said there was a time when I worked with the college and their investigative body and saw how they did their investigations,” DeSilva said in an interview. “I developed respect for them, and it is out of that sense of high regard for them that I’m surprised that they’re taking this approach with Dr. Hoffe because it doesn’t seem to gel with the college I knew.”

Now he says he wonders whether the college has “become another political tool of the government.”

DeSilva says the recent passing of Bill 36, the Health Professions and Occupations Act, suggests to him the B.C. government is looking to replace medical professionals in the province’s colleges with government bureaucrats, which could compromise their integrity.

The Epoch Times reached out to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia but did not receive a reply.

Controversy

Hoffe created controversy in April 2021 when he wrote an open letter to B.C. Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry describing the severe adverse events some of his patients were experiencing after receiving the COVID vaccines, and asking whether the province should reconsider the rollout.

See Cariboosentinel article HERE

“In our small community of Lytton, BC, we have one person dead, and three people who look as though they will be permanently disabled, following their first dose of the Moderna vaccine. The age of those affected ranges from 38 to 82 years of age,” he wrote.

Before writing the letter, Hoffe had been censored from communicating with other doctors about side effects and the person he was told to direct all of his questions to at Interior Health ignored his repeated requests to address his concerns, he says. He was banned from working in provincial hospitals and all of his submissions of vaccine adverse events were overturned and deemed to be coincidence.

See Cariboosentinel article HERE

Former Newfoundland and Labrador premier Brian Peckford also wrote to the college in support of Hoffe and highlighted its lack of adherence to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a document he helped create.

“I urge you to abandon your present course and permit Dr. Hoffe to continue his excellent medical practice providing care in freedom, valuing the right of the person and in practicing the principle of doing no harm,” Peckford wrote.

“May I remind you of the Charter provision of ‘life, liberty and security of the person.’ This is in Canada’s most important document, our Constitution.”

The Epoch Times contacted the B.C. Ministry of Health asking about oversight of the college and whether provisions in Bill 36 were designed to provide additional protections to the college or its members, but did not receive a response by press time.

~Ω~

Dr. Hoffe & Dr. Malthouse Speaking in Quesnel January 15, 2022

/ Webmin / Leave a comment

[UPDATE: (Thurs. Jan 6 11:47 PM) A number of people have replied to an email send out stating that the url to this story is malfunctioning. I’m still trying to figure out what the problem is. More importantly though the Cariboo Sentinel received the following email from Dr. Hoffe:

Dear Arthur,
Unfortunately, for personal reasons, I have needed to stand down from the northern section of our doctor’s speaking tour. So unfortunately I will not be coming to Quesnel.
Thank you for your part and our fight for freedom and truth.
Kindest regards,Charles
Charles Hoffe MD
hoffe.charles@gmail.com
+1-778-538-2183

I will continue to post further information on whether Dr. Malthouse will be on the tour when I find out out.]

______________

[Editor’s Note: Upcoming candidate for Mayor of Quesnel in 2022 Tami Viktil has announced on her fb group Rise Up Quesnel that Dr. Hoffe and Dr. Malhouse, who are currently on a Speaking Tour, will be coming to Quesnel on Saturday, January 15th, 2022 to speak on issues related to BC’s Vaccination program.

The location for the Medical Information Session will be announced as soon as a venue is confirmed. I will post the location here on the site when it has been established. Please share this post with as many of your friends and relatives and associates as you can. Thanks]

Heroes No Longer – Episode 2 – Doctor Charles Hoffe

/ Webmin / 3 Comments

Rumble — This interview was removed from youtube due to it being reported by someone. It had received 55,000 views before it was taken down. Freedom of speech is dying.

Doctor Charles Hoffe of Lytton BC, one of the few doctors in our province willing to speak about that which is forbidden to discuss. Because of this, Charles has sacrificed a great deal. Thank you for all you’ve done and continue to do, Doctor Hoffe.

To help me continue to produce this series please consider donating – https://gofund.me/ffe6b246

EDITORIAL: The Esoteric/Occult Side of Life

/ Webmin / Leave a comment

EDITORIAL: The Esoteric/Occult Side of Life

By 

Arthur Topham

Editor, Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel

We are living at a time that might best be described as extraordinary. Events, of late, have disrupted the normal flow of life to the point where people are not only confused, doubtful and fearful but are suddenly realizing that something is dreadfully wrong in the world; a world which they once unfailingly took for granted.  

There’s a metaphoric tectonic shift occurring within the fundamental superstructure upon which humanity once firmly stood in much the same manner that people viewed the cosmos around them prior to the revelations of Astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus who, in 1512, correctly ascertained that our planet was definitely not the centre of the universe. 

The growing realization that planet Earth is now under siege by a dark and sinister force determined to undermine the very principles by which humanity has lived to its best ability since the advent of the Renaissance has come upon us like a sudden clap of thunder sending jolts of shock and bewilderment and panic throughout societies everywhere.

For those who, for various reasons, cannot fathom that their government, media and health authorities could possibly be conspiring with other governments around the world in what can only be described as the greatest hoax upon humanity in recorded history, their only option has been to accept the massive lie as truth and do their best to follow and adjust their lives to whatever commandments are issued by their government and health representatives. For these people their only sanctuary is to believe that everything they’re being told to do is in their best interests and the interests of the public at large.

While this type of behaviour on their part may appear to be the only laudable and safe way of dealing with the Covid-19 hoax the reality that they are as mistaken as their leaders who, in turn, are willingly culpable in this egregious crime against humanity becomes more blatantly obvious with each passing day and with every new report coming through on the Internet from doctors and scientists and medical practitioners around the world that tears to shreds the government/media/WHO narrative revealing it to be nothing more than a sinister act of colossal deception steeped in a heinous agenda to deliberately murder millions of innocent human beings.  

Faced with this unprecedented global crisis now afflicting all of humanity, individuals are being forced to ponder and search for answers to that proverbial, nagging question – who benefits from these sudden, draconian decrees emanating forth from leaders around the world whose repetitious, deceptive pronouncements are becoming more painfully obvious with each passing day? 

It is at this juncture in our quest for answers to this controversial topic that the notion of a hidden agenda forces its way into the consciousness of the mass of citizens; those who already know intuitively or by signals coming from their gut that there’s more to this treacherous quandary than what meets the eye. Thus the search for truth must circumvent the veil of mainstream media propaganda where tv’s and daily newspapers suddenly become obsolete instruments for seeking out any meaningful answers. Now seekers must recognize the necessity of pulling back the veil in order to look for the hidden or occult reasons for why the planet and its lifeforms are in such imminent danger of being genocided through the use of poisoned injections designed to kill off or cripple millions of souls. 

Donovan Leitch, one of the balladeers of the 1960’s Hippie Movement, described the times we’re now in as the “Season of the Witch” and thus it behooves those who would know the answers to the perplexing questions surrounding events of the moment to cast aside their programmed prejudices toward all things of this nature, suspend their disbelief and critically examine the evidence hitherto hidden from the public domain. 

The Concise Oxford Dictionary tells us that the word “esoteric” is an adjective and describes it as follows: “(Of philosophical doctrines, etc.) meant only for the initiated; (of disciples) initiated; private, confidential.” The term “occult”, also an adjective, is defined thus: “Kept secret, esoteric; recondite, mysterious, beyond the range of ordinary knowledge; involving the supernatural, mystical, magical.”

So the obvious question then for anyone wishing to delve into such subjects is: where can I find information pertaining to these formerly secret philosophical doctrines? The primary source is online. It’s there that the neophyte (beginner) must commence their quest. With a little searching using Duck Duck Go or some other search engine, one first starts by punching in the appropriate terms and following the trail of urls which will transport them, as surely as a yak up some Himalayan mountain slope, to the top of the mountain where they can gain a clearer vision of what lies hidden behind the clouds of illusion that the mainstream media has been manufacturing (like chemtrails) over the past century and longer. 

The adventures ahead for those with the intestinal fortitude to persevere are much too complex and too varied to even attempt to outline in this short editorial. It’s my plan though to publish some recent, relevant articles that will give interested folks a glimpse of what I’ve been talking about and from there one might find it easier to continue to search for the answers that have been hidden from us for much too long. Bon voyage!

—      

Dr. Henry is the biggest liar in B.C. – she knows there is no virus!

/ Webmin / 1 Comment

Submitted by

Marcie Crozier and Family

TO THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE CURRENTLY MAKING DECISIONS FOR THE GOOD PEOPLE OF B.C. AND CANADA:

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room…the big lie. Premier Horgan, have you bothered to ask Dr. Henry if her staff have found the corona virus yet? If Dr. Henry’s people have found the virus, they’re not sharing this information with Health Canada, because Christine Massey has received confirmation from Health Canada that they have no proof of the virus. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/health-canada-has-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/ Mr. Dix, as Dr. Henry’s boss, will her next performance review question her knowledge of the existence of viruses? Have any of you asked Ms. Hajdu and Dr. Tam on what they based their declaration of a pandemic in Canada? Anyone? If the virus has not been detected, HOW CAN THERE BE A PANDEMIC? This is not a rhetorical question!

Dr. Knauss has a PhD in virology and immunology and tested 1500 samples of so called corona virus, using the gold standard: Koch’s Postulates. Are Doctors Tam and Henry even aware of Koch’s Postulates? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch%27s_postulates  Dr. Henry is well aware that Dr. Knauss did not find a virus in any of these 1500 samples, and if she says she isn’t privy to this knowledge, she is either lying or she and/or her staff are highly incompetent as Dr. Knauss’s work has been available for some time now and is no secret. Is Dr. Henry even bothering to pursue proof of the existence of the virus? Dr. Knauss confirms his proof in this video, which is under 4 minutes long: https://www.brighteon.com/2833a107-84e0-48d4-8467-2b9d44ccca80  This article describes his project: https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/02/15/im-a-clinical-lab-scientist-covid-19-is-fake-wake-up-america/  Christine Massey’s multiple documents from hospitals and scientific institutions around the world confirm the same: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FOI-responses-re-covid19-virus-isolation-purification-34-institutions-Nov-11-2020-chrono.pdf  Christine Massey continues to collect this data. Her email address is Christine.Massey@protonmail.com if any of you care to receive future documents confirming the non-existence of this deadly killer virus you all are lying about. Dr. Henry or one of her staff might want to consider getting on this email list!

Here’s the ten million person study confirming there is no asymptomatic spread of this so called virus: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/asymptomatic-transmission-of-covid-19-didnt-occur-at-all-study-of-10-million-finds  THIS PROVES LOCKDOWNS DO NOTHING!  Having said that, please feel free to further restrict the good people of B.C. because your most recent restrictions did much to awake the fence sitters. Have any of you even bothered to find a gold standard study that proves viruses are contagious? I have, and there are none. Seriously, try and find one.

And then there’s this inconvenient letter – inconvenient to liars that is – from the 100+ doctors and scientists from 25 countries to the Europeans Medicines Agency (EMA), who state: “…failure to inform “vaccine” recipients of the risks and negligible benefits outlined here represents serious violations of medical ethics and citizens’ medical rights. Those violations are especially grave as all the risks we describe can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination, and each intervening corona virus exposure. This renders both repeated vaccination and common corona viruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom — in the absence of “vaccination” — COVID-19 poses no substantive risk…We remind the EMA that Nuremberg violations constitute crimes against humanity under the Geneva Convention. Crimes against humanity are deemed “the worst atrocities known to mankind”, and are prosecuted under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/role-international-criminal-court-ending-impunity-and-establishing-rule-law  Given the hundreds of millions and eventually billions of people who may be coerced into accepting these agents, the EMA, in persistently shrinking from open debate and the truth, will be seen by lawyers and historians as having actively assisted in crimes against humanity, with the full weight of the implications to all involved. We demand that you engage openly with us to ensure that the public have an objective understanding of the clinical risk profile of these gene-based interventions.”  https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/rebuttal-letter-to-european-medicines-agency-from-doctors-for-covid-ethics-april-1-2021-7d867f0121e  Of course, like you all, the criminals at the EMA are also avoiding the real questions. If you have any doubt that people are being coerced, we heard from an LNG employee yesterday who was told he had to take the shot or he would lose his job. He felt he had no choice as he has to feed his family. Shame on you!

Once the public recovers from the fear you have been promoting, can you imagine the backlash that will be directed at you all, especially from those who have unwittingly either taken the vaccine or who have family members who have done so? Oh, wait, this is already happening in the UK: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9469529/Mother-demands-answers-son-20-died-12-hours-receiving-Pfizer-jab.html

Has Dr. Henry bothered to honour the highly ethical and courageous Dr. Hoffe with a response yet? https://cariboosentinel.ca/2021/04/11/small-community-of-lytton-bc-has-one-person-dead-and-three-people-permanently-disabled-following-their-first-dose-of-experimental-moderna-gene-modification-vaccine/  Tough questions for liars!

So, in summary, make no mistake that you all are complicit in this massive pandemic fraud. And now the lot of you truly have blood on your hands by continuing to stand for this lie and promote these death shots – yes, that includes you Misters Arnold and Kyllo as you have been provided with the truth, and you chose to ignore it. The level of depravity of you all is shocking!

START TELLING THE TRUTH, YOU LIARS!

Marcie Crozier and family

Choose your leaders with wisdom and forethought. To be led by a coward is to be controlled by all that the coward fears. To be led by a fool is to be led by the opportunists who control the fool. To be led by a thief is to offer up your most precious treasures to be stolen. To be led by a liar is to ask to be told lies. To be led by a tyrant is to sell yourself and those you love into slavery.

~Octavia Butler

MONDAY, APRIL 19, 2021

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO THE CRIMINALS WHO ARE CURRENTLY MAKING DECISIONS FOR THE GOOD PEOPLE OF B.C. AND CANADA:

Further to the letter below, Christine Massey has since received another response confirming that the covid-19/corona virus does not exist. This one is pretty big news as it comes from the U.S. CDC, the corporation that Dr. Henry’s office claims they follow the “science” of. https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CDC-FOIA-request-response-influenza-purification.pdf  “Trust the science” you all say? Yes, yes, we do trust the real science. Why don’t you?

There is a very succinct definition of insanity: “Unsoundness of mind sufficient to render a person unfit to maintain a contractual or other legal relationship…”  Given that the word “person” means corporation, and corporation describes the Province of British Columbia (according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s website – see link following), the word “insanity” is a perfect word to describe the current state of the Government of the Province of British Columbia. https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=province+of+british+columbia&owner=exclude&action=getcompany.

When will one of you – including the media – stand up to the huge lie and do the right thing? Already you all have buckets of blood on your hands with regard to the plethora of deaths and injuries resulting from these experimental mRNA gene therapies! https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YK0JR_lFy88Zu3rcC3L5NvL_Xr3ib6zY/view  We are aware that the bogus “state of emergency” is what allows you to push these experimental death shots!

The Nuremberg Code trials are already happening. Were you aware that the Nuremberg Code is actually part of Canadian law? “Canada is the only western country, [where] any international treaty rights must be incorporated into Canadian domestic law; court said any treaty right is a minimal constitutional protection and standard.” In other words, the standards in the Nuremberg code are not mere guidelines in Canada, they are actionable constitutional guarantees.” https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/exemptions/traiblazing-canadian-constitutional-lawyer-rocco-galati-fights-for-the-world/  In case any of your were unaware, Rocco Galati is one of Canada’s premier constitutional lawyers. https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/surveys-reports/top-25-most-influential-lawyers/the-top-25-most-influential-2015/269873

Were you aware that world renowned lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich, is setting up a class action lawsuit under the Nuremberg Code that will be available to all Canadians? https://unitynewsnetwork.co.uk/the-covid-19-crimes-against-humanity-class-action-lawsuit/ 

Either you rise above the gag order you have been placed under or you rise up for the good people of B.C., Canada and the world. It’s your choice: to be the hero of the people or someone who stayed silent. Do you all truly believe you will escape the sharp sound of the gavel?

Marcie Crozier and family

——