Travelling into Quesnel yesterday to pay our property taxes I came upon a familiar site as I drove past Baker Memorial Hospital along Front Street. There on the sidewalk next to the parking lot across the street from the Co-op gas station were three elderly people all holding up signs. One of the ladies, Marilyn, who is a member of the Covenant of Life Church in Quesnel, was sitting on a chair on the grass and holding up a sign that read “ABORTION HURTS WOMEN”. Below it, leaning against her leg, was a second sign stating, “ABORTION KILLS CHILDREN”. A second elderly lady, Phyllis, a member of the Catholic Church, was standing holding a sign that read, “ADOPTION THE LOVING OPTION”. Next to Phyllis closer to the road into the parking lot was a gentleman, Rick, who was holding up a sign that read, “JESUS FORGIVES & HEALS”.
Rick, Phyllis and Marilyn protesting against the practise of Abortion in Quesnel, B.C.
After paying my dues to Rome and securing our home and property for another year I drove back to where the protesters were and parked in the lot and went to talk with them. Introducing myself Marilyn told me that it would be best to talk to Rick as he was the spokesperson for their group. After some preliminary chit chatting Rick, who is with the Baptist Church, told me that they have been coming out on a regular basis for some time now. They used to protest for two hours each day but now come out for one hour each time. Our message is pretty clear and simple Rick said. As Christians, who believe in God and the Holy Book and have given our lives to promoting the message of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, we understand that Jesus would not be in favour of killing children while still in the womb. He made that plainly evident in Mathew 18 Vs 1-6.
Rick also added to his remarks that even those who have been found wanting by promoting and engaging in this awful practise should not think that they’ve sinned and are now lost forever for should they come to their senses and sincerely repent that Jesus will forgive them.
As the three were just about to pack up for the day my short interview ended and I went back to my vehicle. As I was leaving the parking lot I noted that Rick and Phyllis and Marilyn were praying together prior to leaving and I was able to record their prayer for all those souls whose pending lives here on Earth had been cut short while still in their gestation period and were never given the opportunity to live out their lives. I imagined too that their prayer would also have included those unfortunate women who, for whatever reasons, had decided to end the lives of their babies.
During these dark and troubled time when the children everywhere are being targeted by Satanic forces in an effort to undermine their lives and even mutilate their God-given gender one can only hope that the prayers of good Christian folks like Rick and Phyllis and Marilyn reach the Heavenly Father and the abominable practise of Abortion will cease to be.
The “experts” that our governments and the media have been insisting that we blindly trust for almost two years are now telling us that due to the Delta and other variants herd immunity to the bat flu is either unattainable or requires a much higher percentage of the population to have been immunized than was the case with the original strain of the virus. They are also telling us that the fourth wave of the bat flu, the one we are said to be experiencing at the present, is driven by the Delta variant and that those who, for one reason or another, have exercised their right to reject the vaccine either in full or in part – for those who have had one shot but opted out of a second, or in some jurisdictions have had two but have opted out of a third, for whatever the reason, including having had a bad reaction to the first shot or two, are categorized under the broad “unvaccinated” umbrella by those who think that it is our ethical duty to take as many shots as the government’s health mandarins say we should take – are responsible for this wave, which they have dubbed a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”.
This, however, is a case of the guilty pointing the finger at the innocent.
Think about what they are now claiming. If herd immunity was attainable with the original virus if 70-80% of the population were immunized but with the Greek letter variants it requires 90% or higher if it is attainable at all, then the blame for the current situation, however dire it actually is – and it is probably not even remotely close to being as dire as is being claimed because the media, the medical establishment, and the governments have grossly exaggerated the threat of this disease from the moment the World Health Organization declared a pandemic – belongs entirely to those who insisted upon the “flatten the curve” strategy. Flattening the curve, which required massive government overreach and the dangerous suspension of everyone’s most basic human, civil, and constitutional rights and freedoms, prolonged the life of the original virus, giving it the opportunity to produce these new, reportedly more contagious, mutations. It was the public health orders themselves – not people resisting the orders and standing up for their and others’ rights and freedoms – that gave us the variants. It would have been far better to have taken measures to protect only the portion of the population that was most at risk, while letting the virus freely circulate through the rest of the population to whom it posed minimal risk, so that herd immunity could have been achieved the natural way and at the lower threshold while it was still available. Natural immunity, as even the “experts” now acknowledge, is superior to what the vaccines offer if this can be called immunity at all seeing as it conspicuously lacks the prophylactic aspect that traditionally defined the immunity granted by vaccines for other diseases. When you took the smallpox or the polio vaccine, you did so in order that you would not get smallpox or polio. When you take the bat flu vaccine, purportedly, it reduces the severity of the bat flu so that you are far less likely to be hospitalized or to die from it. When we consider that for those outside of the most-at-risk categories, the likelihood of being hospitalized due to the bat flu is already quite low and the likelihood of dying from it is lower yet, being a fraction of a percentage point, the so-called “immunity” the vaccines impart is not very impressive, making the heavy-handed insistence that everyone must take the jab all the more irrational.
For all the hype about the supposed “novelty” of the bat flu virus, it is now quite apparent that its waves come and go in a very familiar pattern. The first wave, which started in China late in 2019, hit the rest of the world early in 2020 during the winter of 2019-2020 and ebbed as we went into spring. With the onset of fall in 2020 the second wave began and the third wave took place in the winter of 2020-2021. It once again waned as we entered spring of 2021, and the current fourth wave is taking place as summer of 2021 moves into fall of 2021. Each wave of the bat flu, in other words, has occurred in the times of the year when the common cold and the seasonal flu ordinarily circulate, just as the lulls correspond with those of the cold and flu, the big one being in the summer. How many more waves do we have to have in which this pattern repeats itself before we acknowledge that this is the nature of the bat flu, that it comes and goes in the same way and the same times as the cold and flu, compared to which it may very well be worse in the sense that the symptoms, if you get hit by a hard case of it, are much nastier, but to which it is far closer than to Ebola, the Black Death, or the apocalyptic superflu from Stephen King’s The Stand?
The politicians, the public health mandarins and their army of “experts”, and the mass media fear pornographers do not want us to acknowledge this because the moment we do the twin lies they have been bombarding us with will lose all their hold upon us and become completely and totally unbelievable. The first of these lies is when they take credit for the natural waning of each wave of the virus by attributing it to their harsh, unjust, and unconstitutional public health orders involving the suspension of all of our most basic freedoms and rights. The second of these lies is when they blame the onset of the next wave of the virus at the time of year colds and flus always spread on the actions of the public or some segment of the public.
It is the second of these lies with which we are concerned here.
Last fall, as the second wave was beginning, our governments blamed the wave on those who were disobeying public health orders by getting together socially with people from outside their households, not wearing masks, and/or especially exercising their constitutional right to protest against government actions that negatively impact them, in this case, obviously, the public health measures. There was an alternative form of finger-pointing on the part of some progressives in the media, who put the blame on the governments themselves for “re-opening too early”. This form of “dissent” was tolerated respectfully by the governments, a marked contrast with how they responded to those who protested that they could not possibly have re-opened too early because they should never have locked down to begin with since lockdowns are an unacceptable way of dealing with a pandemic being incredibly destructive and inherently tyrannical. Although there was much more truth to what the latter dissenters were saying it was these, rather than the former group, that the governments demonized and blamed for the rising numbers of infections. The governments and other lockdown supporters attempted to justify this finger-pointing by saying that the lockdown protestors, whom they insisted upon calling “anti-mask protestors” so as to make their grievances seem petty by focusing on what was widely considered to be the least burdensome of the pandemic measures, were endangering the public by gathering to protest outdoors. That their arguments were worthless is demonstrated by how they had made no such objections to the much larger racist hate rallies held by anti-white hate groups masquerading under banal euphemisms earlier in the year and, indeed, openly encouraged and supported these even though they had a tendency to degenerate into lawless, anarchical, rioting and looting that was absent from the genuinely peaceful protests of the lockdown opponents.
With the deployment of the rapidly developed vaccines that are still a couple of years away from the completion of their clinical trials under emergency authorization government public health policy has shifted towards getting as many people vaccinated as possible, with a goal of universal vaccination. At the same time, the finger-pointing has shifted towards the unvaccinated or, to be more precise, those who have not received however many shots the public health experts in their jurisdiction deem to be necessary at any given moment. This blaming of the unvaccinated is both a deflection from the grossly unethical means being taken to coerce people to surrender their freedom of choice and right to informed consent with regards to receiving these vaccines and is itself part of those means.
Perhaps “shifted” is not the best word to describe this change in the finger-pointing. While the less-than-fully-vaccinated are being blamed as a whole for the Delta wave the blaming is particularly acrimonious for those who both have not been sufficiently vaccinated to satisfy the government and who have been protesting the public health abuses of our constitutional rights and freedoms the latest of which is the establishment of a system of segregation based upon vaccine choice in which society and the economy are fully or almost fully re-opened to those who comply with the order to “show your papers” while everyone else is put back in lockdown. The CBC and the privately owned media, both progressive and mainstream “conservative” have gone out of their way to vilify such people, as have the provincial premiers and their public health mandarins whose vaccine passport system is obviously punitive in nature. The biggest vilifier of all has been the Prime Minister. In his campaign leading up to the recent Dominion election he was unable to speak about the “anti-vaxxers” – a term, which until quite recently, indeed, until the very eve of this pandemic, designated supporters of holistic medicine who object to all vaccination on principle and who were usually to be found among the kind of tree-hugging, hippy-dippy, types who support the Green Party, NDP, or the Prime Minister’s own party – without sounding like he was speaking about the [Censored. Ed.] to an audience at Nuremberg in the late 1930s.
What we are seeing here is not a new phenomenon. When the ancient Greek city-states were faced with a crisis beyond human ability to control – such as a plague – they would choose someone, generally of the lowest possible social standing such as a criminal, slave or a cripple, and, after ritually elevating him to the highest social standing, would either execute him, if he was a criminal, or beat him and drive him out of their society, in either case as a symbolic sacrifice to avert disaster and save the community. This person was called the φαρμακός, a word that also meant “sorcerer”, “poisoner” or “magician”, although there is no obvious connection between this meaning and the usage we have been discussing and lexicographers often treat them as being homonyms. In some city-states this came to be practices as a ritual on a set day every year whether there was a looming disaster or not. In Athens, for example, the two ugliest men in the city were chosen for this treatment on the first day of Thargelia, the annual festival of Apollo and Artemis. Parallels to this can be found in almost every ancient culture as can the related practice of offering animal sacrifices. Indeed, the practice is generally called scapegoating, from the word used in the English Bible to refer to the literal goat over which the High Priest would confess the sins of the people on the Day of Atonement each year, symbolically transferring the guilt to the goat, which would then be taken out into the wilderness and sent to Azazel, a word of disputed meaning generally taken to refer either to a place in the desert, an evil spirit who dwelled there, or both.
Anthropologists have, of course, long discussed the origins and significance of this phenomenon. While going into this at great length is far beyond the scope of this essay, a well-known summation of the discussion can be found in Violence and the Sacred (1977) by French-American scholar René Girard as can the author’s own theory on the subject. Later in his Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World (1987), Girard, a practicing Roman Catholic, returned to his theory and discussed how it related to Christian theology and to contemporary expressions of violence. He put forward an interpretation of the Atonement that could in one aspect be understood as the opposite of the traditional orthodox interpretation. While there have been numerous competing theories as to how the Atonement works, in traditional Christian orthodoxy the relationship between the Atonement and the Old Testament sacrificial system was understood to be this: the former was the final Sacrifice to end all sacrifices, and the latter were God ordained types of Christ’s final Sacrifice. By contrast, Girard argued that sacrifices were not something instituted by God but arose out of man’s violent nature. When division arose in primitive communities, peace was restored through the scapegoat mechanism, whereby both sides joined in placing the blame on a designated victim who was then executed or banished, and built their renewed unity upon the myth of the victim’s guilt and punishment. The sacrificial system was the ritual institutionalization of this practice. As societies became more civilized the institution was made more humane by substituting animals for people. The Atonement, Girard, argued, was not the ultimate sacrifice but rather a sort of anti-sacrifice. It was not designed, he said, to satisfy the demands of God Who has no need for sacrificial victims, but to save mankind from his own violent nature as manifested in the scapegoat mechanism and sacrificial system. In the Atonement God provided bloodthirsty man with One Final Victim. That Victim offered to His immediate persecutors and by extension all of sinful mankind forgiveness and peace based not upon a myth about His guilt but upon the acknowledgement of the truth of His Innocence and the confession of man’s own guilt.
What is most relevant to this discussion, however, is not how Girard’s understanding of the Atonement contrasts with the more traditional orthodox view, but where both agree – that it brought an end to the efficacy of all other scapegoats and sacrifices. This does not mean that the practice ceased but that it no longer works. One implication of this pertains to the choice that the Gospel offers mankind. If man rejects the peace and forgiveness based upon the truth of the Innocent Victim offered in the Gospel, “there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins” [Censored. Ed.], and so his violence, which the scapegoat mechanism/sacrificial system can no longer satisfy, increases. This means that in a post-Christian society the sacrificial and scapegoating aspect of human violence would reassert itself with a vengeance.
Interestingly, Girard interpreted the New Testament Apocalyptic passages, both those of the actual book of Revelation and those found in the words of Jesus in the Gospels, that speak of disasters, calamities and destruction to fall upon mankind in the Last Days, as describing precisely this, the self-inflicted wounds of a mankind that has turned its back on the peace of the Gospel rather than the wrath of God (see the extended discussion of this in the second chapter entitled “A Non-Sacrificial Reading of the Gospel Text” of Things Hidden Since the Foundation of the World). Certainly the twentieth century, in which the transformation of Christendom into secular, post-Christian, “Western Civilization” that was the main project of the liberalism of the Modern Age came to its completion, saw a particularly ugly resurgence of scapegoating on the part of secular, totalitarian regimes.
I alluded earlier to one such example. Another example can be found in the early history of the Soviet Union and this is for many reasons a closer analogy to what we are seeing today. When the Bolsheviks, a terrorist organization of mostly non-(ethnic)-Russians who hated the Russian Orthodox Church, the Russian Tsar, and the Russian people, most likely in that order, exploited the vacuum created earlier in 1917 when republicans forced the abdication of Russia’s legitimate monarch in order to seize power for themselves and form the totalitarian terror state known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, they created their own scapegoat.
Kulak, which is the Russian word for “fist”, was a derogatory term applied with the sense of “tight-fisted”, i.e., miserly, grasping, and mean to peasant farmers who had become slightly better off than other members of their own class, owning more than eight acres of land and being able to hire other peasants as workers. Clearly this was a loosely defined, largely artificial, category, enabling the Bolsheviks to hurl it as a term of abuse against pretty much any peasant they wanted. The scapegoating of the kulaks began early in the Bolshevik Revolution when the Bolsheviks sought to unify the other peasants in support of their regime by demonizing and vilifying those of whom they were already envious and confiscating their land. After Stalin became the Soviet dictator in 1924 he devised a series of five-year plans aimed at the rapid industrialization and centralization of what had up to then been a largely feudal-agrarian economy. In the first of these, from 1928 to 1932, Stalin announced his intention to liquidate the kulaks and while this worded in such a way as to suggest that it was their identity as a class rather than the actual people who made up the class that was to be eliminated, that class identity, as we have seen, was already largely a fiction imposed upon them by the Bolsheviks and the actions taken by Stalin – the completion of the confiscation of kulak property, the outright murder of many of them and the placing of the rest in labour camps either in their own home districts or in desolate places like Siberia, clearly targeted the kulaks as people rather than as a class. The history of Stalin’s liquidation of the kulaks as well as that of the Holodomor, the man-made famine he engineered against the Ukrainians, is well told and documented by Robert Conquest in his The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror Famine (1986).
“Anti-vaxxer”, like “kulak” is mostly a derogatory term used to demonize people. The term itself ought to be less arbitrary than kulak. Assigning someone to a class of greedy, parasitical, oppressors simply because he is fortunate enough to own a few more acres of land than his neighbour is quite arbitrary and obviously unjust. Identifying someone as being opposed to vaccines on the basis of his own stated opposition to such is not arbitrary at all, although dehumanizing someone on this basis is just as unjust. In practice, however, the “anti-vaxxer” label is used just as arbitrarily. Look at all who have been turned into third-class citizens, denied access to all public spaces and businesses except those arbitrarily deemed “essential” by the public health officials, and whose livelihoods have been placed in jeopardy by the new vaccine mandates and passports. While those who have not taken the bat flu shots because they reject all vaccines on principle are obviously included so are those who have had every vaccine from the mumps to smallpox to hepatitis that their physician recommended but have balked at taking these new vaccines, the first of their kind, before the clinical trials are completed. So are people who took the first shot, had a very bad reaction to it, and decided that the risk of an even worse reaction to the second shot was too great in their instance. So are people who came down with the disease, whose bodies’ natural immune system fought it off, who thereby gained an immunity that recent studies as well as common sense tell us is superior to that imparted by a vaccine that artificially produces a protein that is distinctive to the virus, and who for that reason decided that they didn’t need the vaccine. There are countless legitimate reasons why people might not want to receive these inoculations and it is morally wrong – indeed, evil, would be a better word than wrong here – to bully such people into surrendering their bodily autonomy and their right to informed consent and to punish them for making what, however much people caught in the grip of the public health panic may wish to deny it, is a valid choice. It is even more evil to demonize, vilify, and scapegoat them for standing up for their rights. Ironically, those currently being demonized as “anti-vaxxers” by the Prime Minister and the provincial premiers include all who have been protesting against the vaccine passports and mandates, a number which presumably includes many who have had both of their shots and therefore are not even “unvaccinated” much less “anti-vaxxers” in any meaningful sense of the word, but who take a principled moral stand against governments mistreating people the way they have with these lockdowns, mask mandates, and now vaccine passports and mandates.
The Bolshevik scapegoating of the kulaks, and the as-we-speak scapegoating of the “anti-vaxxers” by all involved in the new world-wide medical-pharmaceutical tyranny, all demonstrate the truth of the implication discussed above of the Atonement’s abolition of the efficacy of sacrifices and the scapegoat mechanism, whether this is understood in the traditional orthodox way, as this writer is inclined to understand it, or in accordance with Girard’s interpretation. If people reject the peace and forgiveness offered in the Gospel and can no longer find it in the old sacrificial/scapegoat system the violence multiplies. In the ancient pre-Christian practices, the victims were singular or few in number (there were only two victims, for example, in the annual Thargelia in Athens). These modern examples of the scapegoating phenomenon involve huge numbers of victims. The sought objective – societal peace and unity – is still the same as in ancient times, but it is unattainable by this method since scapegoating millions of people at a time can only produce division and not peace and unity.
The peace, forgiveness, and unity offered in the Gospel is still available, of course, although the enactors of the new medical tyranny seem determined to keep as many people as possible from hearing that offer. They have universally declared the churches where the Gospel is preached in Word and Sacrament to be “non-essential” ordering them to close at the first sniffle of the bat flu and leaving them closed longer after everything else re-opened, although the number of churches that willingly went along with this and even took to enthusiastically enforcing the medical tyranny themselves raises the question of whether anyone would have heard the Gospel in them had they remained open. Which brings us back to what was briefly observed earlier about Girard’s interpretation of Apocalyptic passages as depicting the devastating destruction of human violence which the scapegoat mechanism can no longer contain when man has rejected the Gospel. Perhaps it ought not to surprise us that throughout this public health panic the medical tyrants have behaved as if the Book of Revelation’s depiction of the beast who demands that all the world worship him rather than God and requires that they show their allegiance to him by taking his mark on their right hand or forehead and prevents them from buying and selling without such a display of allegiance had been written as a script for them to act out at this time.
The Politics of Language: Propaganda, Truth & Justice
A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series
The Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel
May 23, 2021
[Editor’s Note: As I was putting together Part 3 it quickly became apparent that my initial plan for a 3-Part series was not going to manifest in the way I had originally envisioned it. I ought to have known, from past experience, that to attempt such a feat in three relatively short articles would be next to impossible. Books of great length have appeared over the years that deal with the same subject matter that I’m attempting to cover in these brief essays. One of more recent ones, ironically, appeared back in 2012 during the same year in which the forces now under scrutiny in this 3-Part series were responsible for the major attack upon my person and my publishing business via the use of Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” legislation as contained in Sec. 318 – 320 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The title of the book was “The Myth of German Villainy” and the author Benton L. Bradberry. The book is a storehouse of factual information relating to the real history behind the manufactured image of Germany as the most vile, evil nation that ever graced the pages of recorded history. I would highly recommend it to anyone wishing to understand why Germany, a nation of hardworking, honest, forthright and spiritually robust people, ended up becoming, in the eyes of future generations the ultimate pariah nation in the world.
The relevance of Bradberry’s book, and others like it, to the current global dilemma, only becomes apparent when those who are aware of the actual history of the 20th Century begin observing the growing resistance to the Covid-19 False Flag deception and noting the responses of the protagonists who are now becoming representative of those currently under direct attack by this dark and sinister cabal of psychopaths; in particular, men of the cloth like Pastor Artur Pawlowski and other Christians who, because of their faith and their courage, have remained steadfast in their dedication to God, Truth and Justice and to the spiritual principles which guide their lives.
It’s my hope that in pointing out who the real enemy is they might see the logic of focussing their accusations of guilt on the true perpetrators of the present crisis and cease from perpetuating a century old myth whose demise is long overdue.
In order to clarify the issue of responsibility it’s my intent in Part 3 to display via graphic and photographic evidence “the rest of the story”. If, as it is said, every picture tells a story (and every painting as well) then readers and viewers will find a potpourri of visual evidence that should expose a completely different face on the man and the nation whom the world has been brainwashed into believing were the Devil incarnate.]
Adolf Hitler the Christian
Not wishing to stray too far afield from the stated objective, as explained in Parts 1 and 2 of this 3-Part series, I must return to Pastor Artur Pawlowski and my initial purpose which is to draw attention not only to the false perception being spread about the net when it comes to the actions of the Calgary, Alberta police but to reach out to all the other writers, critics and victims currently analyzing the events of the day who, and in their earnest attempts to lay blame upon those responsible for this monumental deception the world is now struggling to understand and counter, are also resorting to the same inaccurate, misleading weaponized terminologies which were purposely designed by the criminal cabal to throw the Truth seeker off the scent and onto side trails that only lead them deeper into darkness and deception.
At this point it must be stated clearly and concisely in the most unequivocal manner possible that Christianity was NEVER under threat at any time by the actions of Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party. No lie could be further from the Truth. Only in some dreary, deserted corner of hell could some depraved mind conjure up such a grotesque and manifest deception and then perpetuate it throughout the world over the past 88 years since Adolf Hitler was first elected Chancellor of Germany in 1933 in what was the most globally covered, transparent, free election of the time.
Being a professed Christian and fully confident in his belief in God and the Church, the suggestion that Adolf Hitler or any of his government agencies would have prohibited the masses of German people (themselves also Christians), from gathering to commune in both spirit and flesh, flies in the face of logic and reason. Knowing the true history of Germany during the time of Hitler’s rule rather than merely mumbling and mouthing what most people today think is true because they saw it on the “History Channel” or in some Hollywood movie, the accusation that the German government would be involved in shutting down churches and dragging pastors out of their vehicles along public thoroughfares to then be subjected to the type of physical and mental abuse we’re witness today here in Canada is too ludicrous to even contemplate.
It’s only because the world has been prevented from seeing who Adolf Hitler really was and what his goals and aspirations were for his beleaguered country that the global cartel of psychopaths have been able to sell the world an image of a man that, upon unbiased inspection, proves itself to be as worthless as the German mark became in 1923 after the Treaty of Versailles virtually bankrupt the nation.
Such are the lies and deceptions of those who, then and now, remain firmly entrenched behind their wall of silence hell-bent on carrying on with their satanic agenda for the destruction of not only Christianity but ultimately, any faith that stands in the way of their atheistic, immoral, heinous agenda for absolute global control.
Given this premise it behooves me to ask of the good Pastor Artur Pawlowski (and anyone else who may be of the same bent of mind), to carefully view the paintings which the real person, Adolf Hitler, bequeathed to the world during his relatively short tenure here on earth and see with their own eyes the things that he held dear to his heart and to then decide whether or not he would be advocating the type of behaviour we’re witnessing today here in “free and democratic” Canada. Let us begin with Adolf’s vision of the birth of Christianity itself.
Ye Shall Know Them By Their Works
Need it be stated that the heart, mind and soul of the artist who created this painting was of a pious, spiritual nature? Is it conceivable to a sane mind that with every brush stroke Adolf Hitler was scheming to destroy Christianity and tear down the churches and imprison Pastors?
What strikes the eye almost immediately upon viewing many of the paintings that the artist, Adolf Hitler, produced are the churches with their steeples reaching heavenward.
What most people never learned in school or from the controlled media or Hollywood was that Adolf Hitler’s first aspiration in his early years was to become an architect. When one sees the quality displayed in many of his artistic works it’s obvious he possessed the gift necessary for such a task. After serving in the front lines during WW1 as a corporal and then realizing that his country was being turned into a Bolshevik Communist hell-hole and a cultural Sodom and Gomorrah, his patriotism and love of Germany forced Hitler to set aside his initial dream in order to help the people understand and overcome the dire straits brought upon them by the International Banking cartel that then held his nation locked in its usurious claws.
A little steeple here…
Everywhere we see in Adolf’s paintings the love of nature combined with the architecture of the times.
A little steeple there…
A little steeple almost everywhere.
The Munich Opera House (before the Allied bombers destroyed it during WW2).
More buildings, more steeples with their crosses prominently displayed.
The architecture of the day drew the artist’s eye to it and he captured it so well.
Unfortunately I am unable to identify all the locations of the buildings that Adolf Hitler painted but given the massive aerial bombing of German cities throughout the war it’s highly likely that most of the structures like those in the above painting were destroyed.
Landscapes, and again the buildings, were a major part of Adolf’s paintings.
Again we see the German countryside with quaint villages and churches displaying a prominent position within the painting.
Always the love of architectural design is present in so many of Adolf Hitler’s works.
Adolf Hitler’s Love of Animals
It is a well known fact among those who have done their research into the true history that Adolf Hitler, apart from being a vegetarian, was also a great lover of animals. Birds too tended to flock to him as well as deer and squirrels as the following photos show.
Hitler’s Architectural Feats
The two things bequeathed to future citizens by Adolf Hitler that actually survived the onslaught of endless hate propaganda and bombing were the Volkswagen which he personally designed and gifted to the German people and the famed Autobahn which he also designed along with a number of public buildings (I’m not privy at the moment as to whether any of the major public buildings which Hitler designed survived the Allied bombings).
The Two Most Loved Leaders
of the 20th Century
John F. Kennedy – President of the USA
The only comparable leader in the Western world who the people loved and adored in the same manner that the people of Germany loved their leader was John F. Kennedy. The similarity of images below will easily illustrate this. It is little wonder therefore that JFK recognized the genius and true nature of Adolf Hitler and spoke highly of him. (It’s also one of the saddest footnotes to 20th Century history that both these great mens’ lives were ultimately destroyed by the same forces who today are attempting to genocide the bulk of humanity).
Adolf Hitler – Chancellor of Germany
The image painted by the Western media of Adolf Hitler as being a tyrannical beast out to murder and destroy the family unit and turn the whole world into one gigantic concentration camp filled with slaves is as virulently hateful as all the other lies that were pumped into the heads of the unwary public throughout the 1930’s and ever since.
Adolf Hitler loved his country and his people and he gave every ounce of his strength to ensure that they would become prosperous again and that the real Beast from the East, i.e. Bolshevik Communism, would never invade and destroy all that the German nation worked so hard to create after 1933.
No unbiased mind could ever honestly testify that the unabashed enthusiasm and joyful countenance present in the faces of these young German girls waving their flags to their leader was the result of being coerced to do so.
So, given my arguments against the misuse of any terms associated with Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party of Germany when describing the brutal treatment Pastor Pawlowski experienced, the obvious question arises: who, if not the dreaded “Nazis”, are responsible for all the notorious behaviour we’re now witnessing on our computer screens as we sit by idly observing the gross acts of the Calgary police toward Pastor Artur Pawlowski and his brother Dawid?
The answer to that burning question is furnished from historic references provided by various individuals who were present during and after Christianity received its first major blow in 1917 in former Tzarist Russia, a period well before the advent Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.
It’s rather ironic really, given the current climate of government shutdowns, hyper pushing of experimental jabs and ‘mandated’ orders to wear masks, that the one reference book which I’m about to quote from; a book that first appeared back in 1943 (of which I possess the 5th Edition that appeared back in 1970) is titled “COMMUNISM UNMASKED”! The 274 page soft cover book authored by Jean Patrice, S.T. M. B.A., is an in-depth study of Communism covering its birth during the 1917 Russian ‘Revolution’ (aka coup) and running through to the time of its 5th edition.
On page 187 the chapter heading reads: “Persecution of Religion in Russia”. I will quote from that chapter to illustrate in greater detail how the actions of the Communist Party toward Christians and Christianity generally, parallel what we’re beginning to see occur here in Canada and elsewhere around the world, albeit on a more subdued level (at least at this stage of events). The author states:
“Let me say something further with regard to the persecution of religion in Russia.
It is a well-known trick (a contemptible one, I grant) for a footballer to be told to “get” some prominent player in the opposing team. The “getting” of that player will make victory surer for the culprit’s side. Now, the real enemy of Communism is religion. Those who believe in God, who maintain that Christ of the Gospels is God, who believe that man is more than a mere animal, but is destined for an after life, those who believe in the immortality of the soul, who believe in certain inalienable rights of man, who stand up for the sanctity of the home – those maintaining such beliefs have no time for Communism, at least, when they realize the true meaning of Communism. So, then, we must not be surprised that Communism in Russia should have picked out the Churches and clergy for special attack….
Let me give a few details with regard to the slaughter of Churchmen in Russia:
From 1918–1920 [Note we’re looking at exactly one century ago. Ed.] 26 Archbishops and Bishops of the Orthodox Russian Church and 5775 priests were massacred. The eyes of the Archbishop of Perm were put out and his face was then slashed, and his Grace was then buried alive. After enduring two months of penal servitude, the Archbishop of Tobolsk was drowned. The Archbishop of Varoneje was hanged before the altar of a church. In 1923 death sentence was passed on the Catholic Archbishop of Leningrad, Monsignor Cieplak, and on Monsignor Budkieviez. As a result of world-wide protests the Archbishop’s sentence was commuted to solitary refinement, but protests on behalf of Monsignor Budkieviez were fruitless. The Monsignor was stripped, shot in the back of the head, and buried with nine criminals in one of Moscow’s suburbs.
In the summer of 1923, 56 Archbishops and Bishops, most of the Orthodox Church, were held captive in different prisons. Archbishop Cieplak suffered the horrors of solitary confinement in a cell measuring six feet by eight.
In December, 1925, 50 Bishops were arrested. In January the following year the Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church was arrested with 500 of the clergy. From 1917 to the spring of that year the Government had closed 364 churches in Leningrad alone. In the middle of 1927, nine Metropolitan, 25 Archbishops, and 83 Bishops were arrested and thrown into prison or taken into concentration camps, or sent in exile into Siberia or Turkestan or the Caucasus. No charges were made against them; they stood no trial. In the concentration camps the prelates were compelled to do all kinds of menial work.
In the history of the world we have seen one religion persecuting another, but the Communist movement in Russia aims at the destruction of anything supernatural in life.
With the coming of the five-year plans, anti-religious activities became intensified, and those who had any active belief in any form of religion had their physical and moral courage put to the test. W.H. Chamberlin, in “Russia’s Iron Age,” page 312, says: “The basic tenets of religion, its ministers and practitioners are ridiculed in cartoons, caricatures, posters, and moving-picture performances; denounced in books and magazines; satirized on the stage; held up in scorn and opprobrium in the anti-religious museums, which have now been installed in many of the most famous Russian churches and monasteries.”
In 1917 there were about 896 Catholic Priests in Russia, and, according to a Russian paper issued in Warsaw, only 30 remained by 1936. The remainder had either been put to death or imprisoned or banished. It is well know that, to-day, practically no Priests remain at liberty in Russia. Even foreign priests are not allowed to enter the country.
We may well imagine what has happened to the churches and monasteries and convents in Russia. Some of the churches have been demolished, whilst others have been converted to other uses, namely, anti-religious museums. Monasteries and convents have become the property of the nation, whilst ecclesiastical property is under the control of the local Soviets….”
Article 124 of the new Soviet Constitution says: “In order to insure to citizens freedom of conscience, the Church in the U.S.S.R. is separated from the State and the school from the Church. [Sound familiar? A.T.] Freedom of worship and freedom of anti-religious propaganda are recognized for all the citizens.
Now, let me examine that. The Constitution guarantees “freedom of worship” and “freedom of anti-religious propaganda.” So then, a person can worship God according to the dictates of his conscience, provided he can find a church or a religious minister. But it is extremely difficult to find one. The Communist Party declared that at the end of the second five-year plan, namely, 1937, there would not be a single edifice in Russia consecrated to religion. The atheistic paper of Russia, entitled “Bezbojink,” of May, 1935, when speaking of the churches, says: “We have closed all the opium shops.” In January, 1936, Soviet newspapers declared that the last Catholic Priest in Odessa was cast into prison.
In the schools, by means of the cinema and newspapers and books, anti-God propaganda is being pushed on. It is difficult to realize fully the appalling results of the Communistic attitude towards religion and morality and family life. Sex vice has become rampant. In November, 1920, the U.S.S.R. became the first nation in the world’s history to legalize abortion.”
It shouldn’t take a rocket scientist to be able to put 2 and 2 together and get 4 rather than attempting the old Soviet method that Joseph Stalin used during the early 1930’s when his government’s economic recovery program motto was 2 + 2 = 5 and he was already solving the problem of overpopulation by starving to death around 10 million Ukrainians and sending millions more Russian Christians to the Gulag Archipelago where the vast majority were worked to death in the slave labour camps. He was well ahead of Gates, Fauci & Co. and the WHO and not forgetting to “Think Global and Act Local” let’s not leave out our own provincial government Kommissars like Alberta’s Jason Kenney and B.C.’s John Horgan & Associates.
Premier Kenney isn’t really that difficult to figure out. I’ve followed his crooked course for years beginning with his tenure in the former Harper Conservative Party as Canada’s Defence Minister. Rather than doing his due diligence and actually defending Canada’s sovereignty he was always too busy kissing foreign ass and taking free trips to the Middle East compliments of lobbyist handouts.
The fact that he would condone the actions of the Calgary Police department and the Edmonton cops who so enjoy locking up churches and intimidating Christian worshippers doesn’t surprise me in the least. I think that little beanie that he has atop his dome is restricting his 7th Chakra too much so that he’s lost his connection with the heavenly realms.
Then again, maybe he’s never been a real hockey fan and is unaware of some of the more provocative teams that Alberta has hosted over the years. I’m positive that if his ol’ grandpa or granny was once a fan of the famous Edmonton Swastikas who were the hottest team on the ice back in 1916 that his attitude toward those nasty “Nazis” in the Calgary Police force would be a lot different!
Calgary Mayor – Naheed Nenshi
Then there’s this goofy SOB who thinks that it’s “white nationalists” (a code term of course for neo-Nazis) who are raising all the fuss about the killer jabs and the masks where everyone’s breathing in their own exhaust fumes thanks to Alberta and BC’s “ mask mandates”.
And why, now that we’re on the subject of the Calgary Police, are we not hearing anything about the head honcho who’s in charge of this gang of hooligans, Chief Mark Neufeld?
The BC Three
As for BC and our own 3 Bullies on the block we too are looking at a group of manic misfit managers who are so out to lunch in terms of honesty, integrity and reality itself that like Albertans we’ve got some very serious work to do in order to stop these psychopaths from killing off more and more unwary citizens who, because of their sincere belief and trust in their government, are being bushwhacked and hoodwinked and jabbed with poisons that will destroy their lives and in the process likely destroy countless others around them including their families.
But, putting all levity aside, Christians who have studied their Bible and understand the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ should be the first group of people to realize exactly who is behind all this Satanic cult energy we see manifesting practically everywhere around the world. Christianity has always been under attack and always will be so long as Satan is left to do his thing and lately he’s been having a heyday doing what comes naturally for the Prince of Darkness.
One ray of hope that I do see is the willingness on the part of many Christians today to openly embrace and cooperate with others who also see what they see and whether this common darkness is perceived as being Satan or Lucifer or simply power-crazed lunatics and psychopaths and criminals, Christians are uniting with this growing mass of individuals everywhere who realize that they’ve got a real common enemy that MUST BE STOPPED and it’s now imperative that we all put sectarian issues aside and work together if this Beast 666 is going to be destroyed so that life might carry on as God meant it to be.
P.S. If any reader can pass this series of articles on to Pastor Pawlowski it would be greatly appreciated.
[Editor’s Note: The following article is of interest on a number of levels but what I found rather rather poignant is the organization’s position when it comes to the subject of Immunization, a topic currently under fierce debate online given the Covid-19 agenda for jabbing the population of the world in order to kill off millions of misinformed citizens.]
Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis
The Authentic Rosicrucian Fraternityin the Americas and the Isles of the Sea
Welcome to the authentic Rosicrucian Fraternity that was first instituted in Germany in 1614. This Fraternity brought together into one organization the various associations of individuals previously known as the Hermetists, Pythagoreans, Magi , Platonists, Gnostics, Alchemists, and Paracelsians.
The Rosicrucian Fraternity existed in America prior to the First American Revolution. In 1774, the great Council of Three (the Fraternity’s ultimate governing body) was composed of Benjamin Franklin, George Clymer and Thomas Paine. Thomas Paine was later succeeded by Lafayette, who, like Benjamin Franklin, was a member of the Paris Rosicrucian lodge “Humanidad.” In 1842, the Great Council of Three was revitalized by the novelist, George Lippard, who rewrote the exoteric ritual, giving it a patriotic-Christian basis. During the Civil War this Great Council was composed of Paschel Beverly Randolph, General Ethan Allen Hitchcock and Abraham Lincoln.
What is the mission of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?
The Fraternitas Rosae Crucis has two missions or functions, one esoteric and the other exoteric. The esoteric mission is to serve and guide those individuals who are willing to devote themselves to a spiritual life and who are willing to take this sacred vow upon their soul. In other words, the Fraternity offers spiritual teachings to individual members who desire to develop their soul from a “slumbering ember” to a fully conscious spiritual being. The exoteric mission is to disseminate spiritual and scientific truths for the betterment of the physical, moral and intellectual condition of all humanity. The Fraternity’s mission is dual- an outer work directed toward the betterment of humanity and an inner work concerning the development of the individual soul.
What are the fundamental teachings of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?
The Fraternitas Rosae Crucis teaches that there is one God, the Creator and source of all. That within each of us is buried a particle of the Divine element, a Divine Spark, of and from God. This celestial spark is our soul. Furthermore, God gave us the gift of free will and the opportunity to either diminish or grow this tiny spark by our mode of life; by our thoughts, desires and actions. To develop this celestial soul spark, we must transmute (change) our lower nature and increase the feeling of love within our being. The end result of our efforts is to build this soul spark into a glorious, conscious Soul that forms a direct link between the individual and God. This state of spiritual development is termed Soul Consciousness or Soul Illumination. Illumination of the Soul is symbolized by the fully bloomed rose in the center of the cross of transmutation, the Rosy Cross. The mission of the Fraternitas Rosæ Crucis is to guide individuals, one by one, on the Path toward the ultimate of their Divine Inheritance, Soul Consciousness followed by God Consciousness.
What is the character of a dedicated student of the Rosicrucian Fraternity?
He or she, is one who, because of their physical, mental and spiritual attainment, is considered qualified as a member of the esoteric Rosicrucian Fraternity. The true Neophyte in the Fraternity is first of all a seeker after wisdom and an aspirant after the deepest truths knowable to humankind. This wisdom is not sought for selfish purposes, but to enable the individual to better help their fellow mortals; to better qualify the Neophyte to serve God and humanity, and thus be better able to aid their fellow humans in their struggle to raise themselves to higher levels.
To help you to further understand just what the Rosicrucian Fraternity is, it might help to tell you what it is not. It is not a social lodge or organization. Although students do have an opportunity to gather on Beverly Hall grounds during teaching sessions called Convocations, these meetings are for the spiritual development of the individual and not for sociability. Nor is it only a center for the distribution of ancient mystic knowledge. Although it does do this, but only in so far as it helps the student’s own personal Spiritual development. Likewise, it does not confer spiritual degrees on its students by ritual alone. Such rituals are only valid when they merely confirm a state of Spiritual growth that the student has already earned by his or her own personal efforts.
If you desire further understanding of underlying philosophy and Arcane Teachings of this Ancient Spiritual Fraternity then click the link below or the Teachings tab above.
The Church of Illumination espouses a long historic doctrine on both the physical and spiritual dangers of vaccination and immunization. Reverend Reuben Swinburne Clymer M.D. and Alexander Wilder M.D. were founding members of the Church of Illumination. Both adamantly voiced the Church’s tenet on immunization and its attendant consequence of spiritual harm, which they termed blood pollution.
Dr. Wilder firmly embraced the spiritual conviction that we are created in the image of God, by God, and being Holy and Sacred, our person should not be defiled or polluted; that the medical practice of attempting to prevent or cure diseases by means of injecting or transmitting “vile animal serums” was wholly against the Divine Law. This concept was in full harmony with the teachings of the Church and the Biblical injunction “to seek the kingdom of heaven” and to “become the Sons and Daughters of God,” free from all evil. As a result of his strong convictions, Dr. Wilder founded the first anti-vaccination society in the United States in the late 1800’s. (More information on Dr. Wilder can be found here).
Dr. Clymer was Director General of the Church from 1905 to his death in 1966. Following the footsteps of Dr. Wilder, in 1904, he authored his first text on this subject, Vaccination Brought Home to You. He further reiterated the Church’s tenet that immunizations are a form of spiritual blood pollution in The Book of Rosicrucaie, Volume II (1947) and the now out of print book, Age of Treason (1957).
Reverend Emerson M. Clymer held the position of Director the Church of Illumination from 1966 to his death in 1983. Rev. Clymer also assumed the office of president of the Humanitarian Society, an outreach program of the Church established to educate the public concerning both spiritual and health related topics. He edited and co-authored the book, The Gifts of the Spirit, The Doctor Within (1976) and was editor of The Dangers of Immunization (1979). The spiritual and potential physical dangers of immunizations outlined in these two books were further expanded in the book, Vaccination and Immune Malfunction, by Harold E. Buttram M.D. and John Chriss Hoffman (1987). All of these books are printed and published by the Philosophical Company, which has been the printing establishment and repository for the Church literature since 1902.
Prohibition Against Vaccination/Immunization
The Bible teaches that the body is the temple of the God:
“Do you not know that you are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwells in you? And whoever defiles the temple of God, God will destroy; for the temple of God is holy, and that temple is you,” (1 Corinthians 3:16-17).
The Bible also informs us that our spiritual mission on earth is to develop (regenerate) our soul and become at one with God:
“And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel,” (Matthew 19:28).
“But those who received him, to them he gave power to become sons of God, especially to those who believed in his name,” (John 1:12).
The Church teaches that the Soul is the Light or the divine image of God. The body is the house of the soul-spark and can become the temple of God, wherein the spiritualized (regenerated) Soul can dwell. To achieve this spiritualized state, individuals must harmonize their thoughts and actions with God’s Divine Law and keep the body sufficiently pure.
The Church of Illumination further affirms that immunizations are a form of blood and body pollution, which defiles the purity of the body:
“You shall not pollute the land in which you live, for blood pollutes the land, and no atonement can be made for the land for the blood that is shed in it, except by the blood of the one who shed it. You shall not defile the land in which you live, in the midst of which I dwell, for I the Lord dwell in the midst of the people of Israel,” (Numbers 35:33-34).
The Church spiritually interprets “land” as both a physical land (exoteric interpretation) and also symbolic of human body that is to become purified and undefiled (esoteric interpretation).
The fundamental tenet of the Church of Illumination is the Immortalization of the individual soul (the divine spark) within the temple of the body. This spark, a germ of God, is the potential Christos, or Light of Soul Illumination and can be developed by the conscious effort of each individual. Each individual is a nucleus of Light, a Temple or Church for the living, radiating Christ.
The Church teaches that the body is a spiritual structure wherein the spiritual sun shall constantly shine and that this body, if properly cared for, is its own best “doctor within.” The Church furthermore teaches that it is our spiritual responsibility and duty to keep our bodies clean and pure, as it is a temple for our soul that dwells within it. The teachings of the Church unequivocally affirm that injections of vaccines and inoculations are a violation of these biblical teachings as they are a form of blood pollution, defiling and polluting the body (spiritual temple). Immunizations and vaccinations are a form of blood pollution because they have devastating effects on the regeneration of the soul that each Church member seeks to attain.
It remains for future generations to fully recognize and record the consequences of what in truth is an ongoing scientific experiment. At the present time approximately one third of America’s children are afflicted with autism, learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity syndrome (ADHD), allergies, and/or asthma, all of which were rare or uncommon three or four generations ago. Due to gross deficiencies in vaccine safety tests, documented during US Congressional hearings on vaccine safety (1999-Dec. 2004), there is as yet no direct proof of vaccine-causation, but there is overwhelming circumstantial evidence, reviewed in this book, of vaccine-causation of current deteriorating health patterns among our youngsters, which is or should be considered the leading threat to America’s future and well-being.
Author: Dr. Harold Buttram
Book Type: Paperback
The Immune Trio explains the dangers of vaccine immunization, including immune malfunction and genetic mutation.
Author: Fifth edition by Harold Buttram, M. D. and John Hoffman, Ph. D.