Action4Canada: Legal Action Update May 31st, 2022

Tanya Gaw, founder of Action4Canada, gives an update after the court proceeding addressed the Motion to Strike set forth by the defendants named in Action4Canada’s Statement of Claim. 

Action4Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and UNITING our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of this nation. Through Call To ACTION campaigns, we equip citizens to take action. We are committed to protecting…FAITH, FAMILY and FREEDOM.


Thank you to everyone who attended in person at the BC Supreme Court in Vancouver. The court was filled to capacity (78 seats) plus there were another 50-70 people outside of the court room.

The court proceeding addressed the Motion to Strike set forth by the defendants named in Action4Canada’s Statement of Claim. Justice Alan Ross presided.

It was an amazing day in court watching Rocco Galati in action. Rocco was brilliant as he argued the merits of the case in opposition to the Motion to Strike. 

Rocco pointed out that this is not a straightforward case such as a truck hitting a bicycle, but rather one of extreme complexity and huge public interest.

Rocco meticulously provided case law, both Canadian and International, to defend our position as well as facts supported by evidence, to counter the defense’s accusation that the case was founded on “conspiracy theories.” Mr. Galati advised Justice Ross that the case is not based on conspiracy theories but rather facts, and that he can provide the evidence proving that Bill Gates funds GAVI and the WHO; Bonnie Henry has ties to Bill Gates and the WHO; Teresa Tam is tied to the WHO; Justin Trudeau paid a billion dollars to Bill Gates; and many more important points.

The proceedings began at 10:00am PST and there were ‘seven’ lawyers representing the defendants.

Mr. Witten, the lead counsel for John Horgan, Bonnie Henry and the other provincial crown defendants, was the first to speak and provided a very weak submission. Mr. Witten provided no evidence to support his vague allegations and argument that the Statement of Claim was “replete with groundless conspiracy theories, deficient in substance, frivolous, convoluted, scandalous, irrelevant, costly, an embarrassment and an abuse of the court’s process.” Mr. Witten made further claims that the Notices of Liability were threatening and intimidating to those who received them and that the delivery of said documents was harassment.

Mr. Witten spoke for more than hour and covered several sections of the Statement of Claim (SOC) in great detail. It was impressive to hear the merits of the case being spoken by the defense and at times it became difficult to know if he was representing the defendants or the plaintiffs. As Mr. Witten read through the details of the Statement of Claim it only legitimized our position that the government has indeed violated the Constitutional rights of Canadians, caused irreparable harm and over-stepped their authority.

The lawyers representing the additional defendants named in the SOC provided their submissions and it was clear that they also had no argument or evidence to support their reasons for the Motion to Strike.

There was a break for lunch and upon returning to the court at 1:30pm PST Rocco began his response. As mentioned above it was nothing less than brilliant and something to behold.

Mr. Galati not only challenged Mr. Witten for referring to the case as a conspiracy theory but also for making the absurd statement that it would be too much work and too costly to proceed with this case. Mr. Galati called out the provincial governments and the Prime Minister for spending an accumulative 1.2 trillion dollars on COVID-19 measures and that by comparison, the cost for the case would be inconsequential.

Rocco brought to the attention of the court Mr. Witten’s lame and offensive efforts to discredit him by reporting that Rocco had 10 cases which were dismissed due to Motions to Strike, but conveniently failed to point out Rocco’s nearly 600 reported cases that were won. None of his wins were revealed by Witten. Rocco pointed these facts out to remind the court that previous wins and losses are irrelevant. The Case at hand is the only issue.

Mr. Witten further failed to mention the thousands of cases that Rocco has argued in his 34 year career and the many wins he has achieved. Justice Ross thanked Mr. Galati for the information and it rightfully elevated the level of respect due to Rocco.

In closing, Rocco stood on the merits of the case and that it is a matter of public interest and should not be dismissed. Rocco added, “the Constitution does not kneel, bend nor kiss the feet of public health officers, or any public officials, including the legislatures.”

There is so much more to report but these are some of the highlights. Live updates were posted during the proceedings.

The defense lawyers were then given the opportunity to reply but ZERO replied! None of them had a rebuttal! This is because they could not respond to Rocco’s correction of the defendant’s counsel’s embarrassing mis-statement and ignorance of Constitutional law and rights pleaded.

We now await Justice Ross’ decision which may take up to 30 days. We will make an announcement once the information is made available to us.

To access the Court docs visit the Legal Action Page.

Remember: Freedom of speech, thought, belief and the right to life, liberty and security of the person are guaranteed. We do not need to beg, barter or ask for them…they are ours for the taking.

Please consider becoming a monthly donor and help Action4Canada continue to bring solutions and hope to the nation!

God bless you and God bless Canada!

The Team @
Action4Canada

~Ω~

Trudeau Silent As Churches Burn & Canada Becomes An Anti-Christian Nation

Trudeau Silent As Churches Burn & Canada Becomes An Anti-Christian Nation

By 

Brad Salzberg

June 28, 2021

While publicly promoting his adherence to the Catholic faith, PM Justin Trudeau’s behaviour reveals an approach entirely antithetical to Christian values.

A prominent Indigenous leader in the B.C. Southern Interior is condemning acts of possible arson after four Catholic churches burnt down on First Nations land in six days.

“I wouldn’t call it suspicious, I’d call it what it is, it’s a criminal act, it’s vandalism. It’s arson,” said Chief Clarence Louie of the Osoyoos Indian Band in British Columbia.

Cultural Action Party (CAP) are also in the habit of calling it what it is:  Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is silent as a church mouse regarding these multiple acts of arson.

CAP has never understood Justin Trudeau’s approach to religion and religious communities in Canada. While publicly advancing personal commitment to the Catholic faith, his behaviour reveals an approach wholly antithetical to Christian values.

Justin Trudeau is an advocate for mass abortion–the most committed prime minister since father Pierre Trudeau. Our current PM supports homosexuality, transgenderism and gay marriage. He the also the founder of Canada’s officially legislated euthanasia policy.

All are anti-Christian to the maximum degree. Not that his inverted behaviour stops here. A fervent dedication to an advancement of non-Christian religions has existed since day one. In contrast, our Liberal government has been running down Christianity like there is no tomorrow.

Take the recent Indigenous residential school debacle. As a result of a discovery of mass graves beneath these schools, PM Justin Trudeau has urged the Catholic Church to take responsibility for its role in the persecution of Aboriginals.

What Trudeau has not done – and never will do – is fess up to the role the government of Canada played in the historical mistreatment of Canada’s Aboriginal communities.

According to a Canadian University Indigeneous Foundations report, the term residential schools refers to an extensive school system set up by the Canadian government and administered by churches that had the “nominal objective of educating Indigenous children.”

How does one properly interpret “set up by the government and administered by churches.” Common sense dictates that government –both Liberal and Conservative – hold jurisdiction over the church. Therefore, if government wanted change within the residential school system, they could have cut off the funding. They never did.

Justin Trudeau’s reluctance may be motivated by another fact eschewed by Canadian media – father Pierre Trudeau was ultimately responsible for running the schools. From 1969 until 1978, control and maintenance of residential schools was in the hands the federal government of  Canada.

The Liberal Party was the ruling government of Canada from 1968 to 1979. The prime minister throughout this eleven-year period was Pierre Trudeau. What a fascinating discovery this is. On this basis, it is fair to state that the prime minister most responsible for the residential school debacle in the modern era is Pierre Trudeau.

In summary, what we have here is a litany of anti-Christian practices perpetuated by the Liberal Party of Canada. This decades-long dynamic been been driven forward by both Justin Trudeau, and Pierre Trudeau before him. In contradistinction, our current PM has supported so-called “minority” religions such as Sikhism and Islam like no politician in history.

Now comes the mysterious part: throughout this entire 50-year process, mainstream media have never written a single word about any of this. Strange, it is not? What can one deduce– other than the idea that this is an intentional, pre-conceived agenda?

In terms of motivation, one explanation rises above the rest– within communist societies, the Christian religion is unwelcome. For example, Christians in China are a persecuted community.

Can astute citizens therefore conclude that an emulation of this dynamic has now permeated Canadian society? Is it not a fact that both Justin and Pierre Trudeau are advocates of communist governance?

Is it possible that CAP has hereby pieced together a reality that has been buried by establishment media for the past 50 years? So many questions–so little time before our country transitions from democracy to dictatorship.

___

Brad Salzberg,

CAP Founder (Est. 2016)

The Strange Case Of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s War Against Everything

The Strange Case Of NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh’s War Against Everything

By Brad Salzberg/ CAP

Federal New Democratic Party Leader Jagmeet Singh has drawn a connection between anti-lockdown protests and far-right extremism.

“To brazenly not follow public-health guidelines puts people at risk and that is something that we’ve seen with extreme right-wing ideology,” he told reporters.

The fact that Canadians from all walks of life have refrained from adhering to public-health guidelines seems inconsequential to Jagmeet Singh. The attitude remains consistent– if Singh can figure out a way to associate a social issue with racism, he will do so. Such is the “calling card” of Mr. Singh and his fight against nearly every element of Canadian society.

Just this week, Mr. Singh attended a drive-in for an end of Ramadan event in Mississauga with Taranvir Dhaliwal, who works  for his brother Gurratan — a provincial NDP MPP.

Captured on video was a violation of Covid regulations on the part of the NDP leader. Neither Singh, nor mainstream media, issued a statement on whether or not this confirmed his dedication to right-wing ideology.

Such is the malarky that emanates from this most curious of federal party leaders. A former lawyer who served as a provincial politician in Ontario,Jagmeet Singh became the first member of a visible minority to lead a national political party in Canada when he won the NDP leadership in 2017.

Neglected at the time was the fact that Mr. Singh was literally parachuted into a Vancouver suburb in order to secure as seat as a member of Parliament. Lacking tangible connection to the riding, within two months of arrival the MP seat had been secured. Perhaps it helped that next to white-minority Richmond,Burnaby is the most 3rd World-oriented riding in Greater Vancouver.

From MP to NDP party leader was another hop, skip and jump. As reported by CBC NewsSingh raised 53 per cent of all the money collected by the four candidates. His support was largely drawn from his home region of the Greater Toronto Area, which alone represented two-thirds of his fundraising.

How fascinating this is. For one thing, who knew that community members in the GTA— meaning Sikh stronghold Brampton-–  cared so deeply about election results 4000km away in Vancouver?

Such were the sketchy circumstances surrounding Jagmeet Singh’s rise to the top of the NDP Party totem pole. Once he got there, he began to indulge in a hobby shared by PM Justin Trudeau: playing the “race card” against those who ideologically oppose his brand of globalist politics.

In June 2020, Singh was removed from Parliament after refusing to apologize to Bloc Quebecois House Leader Alain Therrien. Mr. Singh called Therrien a racist for denying the approval needed for a motion calling out systemic racism in the RCMP.

Not a speck of contrition was heard from a stiff-necked Singh.“I don’t back down from standing up to racism… I don’t think it benefits for me to call people names, I was angry at the moment and I stand by it,” he said afterward.

The NDP Leader was seeking unanimous consent. He didn’t get it– hence the racism accusation outburst. At this stage of the game, Canadians know all about what Jagmeet Singh stands against. As far as what he stands for, that’s another ball game. Media have little interest. Policy presentation is generally met with a shrug from all sides.

If the Cultural Action Party didn’t know better(we don’t), we might conclude that the purpose of Mr. Singh’s leadership falls outside traditional elements of party leadership. Curious it is that a technically powerless character such as this has on multiple occasions held the fate of Justin Trudeau’s minority government in his hands.

In each case, Trudeau has been bailed out by the NDP.  Similar in character, both share a knack for race-card pretensions. Could it be that the Trudeau-Singh relationship is, in fact, a tacit agreement for the maintenance of a globalist ethos?

Put it this way: if Trudeau was playing quarterback for the Great Reset Rough Riders, Jagmeet Singh would be sitting on the bench as a back-up.

Damage In Disguise: How Justin Trudeau Fuels The Woke Generation’s Hatred Of Canada

According to New Indian Express, the NDP leader has more than once openly voiced his support for Sikh separatists in Canada, earning him the tag of being “pro-Khalistan.”

In 2013, Singh was denied a visa to India for criticizing New Delhi’s human rights record, in turn becoming the first western legislator ever to be denied entry into the country.

 Jagmeet Singh’s dedication to Sikh politics in undeniable. As for Canada, the man shares Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s scorn toward the colonial founding of our nation.

What a long, strange trip it has been from the days of a nascent NDP Party founded by Tommy Douglas.  A Scottish Canadian who served as Premier of Saskatchewan from 1944 to 1961, Mr. Douglas was leader of the New Democratic Party from 1961 to 1971.

This salt-of-the earth founder of universal medicare would be turning in his grave if he were to witness the transformation within his party.

In fact, CAP is all-in on the idea that Mr. Douglas would consider the circumstances nothing less than a globalist hi-jacking of the NDP Party of Canada.

— Brad Salzberg, CAP Founder (Est. 2016)