Open letter to Premier David Eby on the reinstatement of BC’s laid off nurses
By Arthur Topham
Editor – CaribooSentinel.ca
Dear Premier David Eby, et al,
Your stubborn refusal to face the reality that the Covid-19 scamdemic is DEAD and over with has to end. Your government’s unwarranted mis-treatment of our dedicated nurses who the NDP kicked out of the hospitals for refusing to take the killer jab also MUST end and these trained professionals be reinstated and compensated for loss of wages plus all the concomitant negative results of your government’s ill-conceived actions. Such treatment of BC’s nursing profession by you and your cohorts is more akin to the actions of communist nations like China not so-called Democratic nations like Canada.
Given all your past credits for having been the Executive Director of the BC Civil Liberties Association and an award-winning human rights lawyer all of those accomplishments fly in the face of such draconian, mean-spirited treatment of the nurses here in B.C.
I was personally in communication with you a few years back when the Ontario Civil Liberties Association was standing up for me during my own litigation over the issue of freedom of speech in Canada when we were requesting support from the BC Civil Liberties Association. As I recall trying to get you onboard was like pulling teeth with vice-grips.
For all the rhetoric and fanfare that the office of Premier provides you none of that matters in the long run. What truly matters is that you get your shit together and accept the fact that this heinous scamdemic you, Horgan, Henry, Hix and the rest of the NDP party have been colluding in with the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, Bill Gates, Fauci and all the rest of the global elite psychopaths has to cease and common sense once again guide you all.
The party’s over David. The world is on to your scheming on behalf of those who want to murder the majority of humanity and turn the rest into genetically modified organisms. Best you make things right and reinstating the unemployed nurses would be a good first step on the road back to justice and freedom.
As 2022 draws to a close I see Canada’s Independent and Social Media along with the Conservative Party of Canada all abuzz over PM Justin Trudeau’s latest effort on the part of his globalist handlers to deliver a final blow to the New World Order’s inescapable Nemesis – the INTERNET.
Ads on Facebook by the Conservative Party of Canada, like the one below, are calling on Canadians to sign their petition and help them stop the Liberal’s blatant attempt to curb the tongues of the general public when they’re online before the final judgement call occurs and “the People” learn who is really behind all the madness the world’s been subjected to since the advent of the Great Scamdemic of 2020.
When I clicked on their petition ad to sign it a window opened stated the following:
STOP ONLINE CENSORSHIP
“We the undersigned call on the Liberal government to stop their C-11 censorship law that will curtail the freedom of expression Canadians enjoy online.
Whereas the Liberal Bill C-11 threatens to end the freedoms of Canadians on the internet in an open marketplace with a free exchange of ideas.
Whereas under this archaic system of censorship, government gatekeepers will now have the power to control which videos, posts and other content Canadians can see online.
Whereas Conservative Senators are keeping up the pressure in the Senate to abandon this ill-conceived censorship of freedom of expression online.
And whereas Conservatives will continue to fight back to defend the freedom of expression of Canadians, without which no other Charter rights are possible.
Therefore be it resolved that we call on this Liberal government to roll back their online censorship law C-11, and ensure Canadians’ right to freedom of expression online is protected.”
Of course for old radical’s such as myself who’ve been in the freedom of speech front line trenches for decades (and still am!) there’s a bit of irony (and possibly even hypocrisy) attached to the Conservative Party’s current love affair today with the concept of “freedom of expression”.
I can readily recall that it was under the dictatorship of the late Conservative PM Stephen Harper that the freedom of expression loving folks in Canada were already living in and suffering under a tyrannical, Orwellian dystopia thanks to former PM Pierre Trudeau and the Liberal’s draconian Sec. 13 “hate crime” legislation which they had surreptitiously slipped in under the wire immediately following 911 when the House was adjourning for the Christmas break.
Below is an image of many of the former victims of Canada’s undemocratic Censorship Laws.
While Sec.13 was obviously not the creation of the Conservative Party, PM Harper’s government had been going along with it up until the point where they finally realized that it was in fact a double-edged sword; one that could be used to silence not only critics of the left but also critics of the right. This occurred when a couple of media personalities of the day (who I’m not able to identify due to legal restrictions) had complaints laid against them by those who they were running down in the controlled media.
As a result of the conundrum the Conservatives found themselves in they were able to eventually repeal this specious piece of Orwellian legislation with the help of some Conservative Senators back in 2012.
Their fundamental error though at the time of repealing Sec.13 from the Canadian Human Rights Act was to fail to go one step further and repeal the more sinister and dangerous freedom-destroying legislation contained in the Canadian Criminal Code under Sections 318-320; ones which the Liberal government continues to embellish with further restrictions and undoubtedly plan to use against Canadian citizens in the times ahead.
It’s my hope that this time around the Conservative Party of Canada, should they gain a majority in the next federal election, will resolve this issue of freedom of expression once and for all and return to the common sense approach that existed in the former Canadian Bill of Rights which Conservative PM John Diefenbaker bequeathed to Canada on July 1, 1960. His words, spoken 62 years ago, still strike the hearts of all freedom loving Canadians today:
“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and for all mankind.”
History of Censorship in Canada
For those too young to remember and those still asleep at the wheel a decade ago it’s incumbent upon me to clarify the who, what and where of this former Censorship legislation known as Sec.13 and Sec. 318-320 of the CCC as well as the history of censorship in Canada from its nascent beginnings.
It’s my position, based upon over 20 years of research and 15 years of ongoing litigation, that Canada’s judicial system was infiltrated and co-opted by globalist interests operating in Canada since as early as 1919. Of course such an assertion will automatically be met with a loud hue and cry of “preposterous! outrageous!” followed immediately by much hand-wringing and declamations of “hatred” and “racism” and further punctuated, dramatized and broadcast across the nation via the Controlled Mainstream Media. So be it. It doesn’t detract one iota from the facts.
All that’s required in order to verify this war against our rights and freedoms, including our most basic right of speaking out and expressing our views on issues vital to our national well being, is to delve into any and all of the legal cases over the past 55 years associated with the issue of freedom of expression and one will see immediately that in practically every instance the globalist elites lining up and vying for intervenor status. And furthermore, concomitant with their zealousness to intervene is usually the underlying fact that it was themselves who were instrumental in bringing forth the charges. And if that isn’t the norm then they’re undoubtedly there to make sure that the complainant (usually an agent in one form or another) gets the maximum support of their power and influence in the courts and the media.
One might legitimately say that these deceptive measures to control freedom of speech actually began before the commencement of WW2. After Hitler and the National Socialist Party came to power in 1933 the world’s globalists in Canada were already growing fearful that Canadians might begin to believe what Chancellor Hitler was saying about the International banking cartel and their control of Germany’s own beleaguered nation and so, as a result of their growing paranoia, the provincial government of Manitoba, (of all places) passed a statute to combat what was apparently perceived to be a “rise in the dissemination of Nazi propaganda”, the premise of which (The Libel Act, R.S.M. 1913, c. 113, s. 13A (added S.M. 1934, c. 23, s. 1) was later to become The Defamation Act, R.S.M. 1987, c. D20, s. 19(1) and was in all likelihood the first volley launched against freedom of expression in Canada.
Up until 1970 Section 181 of the Criminal Code which reads, “Every one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.” was the only provision in the Code even remotely connected to the offence of group defamation but it didn’t, at the time, specifically make mention of “hate propaganda”.
When WW2 ended the work of the globalists began in earnest. Their first step in the direction of censorship was the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948 with its references to “hate propaganda”. By 1953 we find that the globalists in Canada were already diligently pursuing efforts toward this same end with their attempt to insert anti-hate propaganda provisions into the Canadian Criminal Code which was being revised in that same year.
Their deceptive labours eventually bore fruit in 1965 when they were finally able to convince Canada’s federal Justice Minister Guy Favreau to appoint a special (interest?) committee to look into the purported “problems” connected with the dissemination of “hate propaganda” in Canada.
Surprisingly (not) what became known as “The Special Committee on Hate Propaganda in Canada” was fully furnished with a gaggle of legal beagles that included one notable lawyer who would become instrumental in aiding the globalists in their relentless quest for censorship laws.
This was none other than Professor Pierre E. Trudeau, Associate Professor of Law, University of Montreal, soon to become Canada’s Prime Minister.
The committee studied the alleged “problem” from January 29th to November 10th, 1965 and their conclusions called for new legislation that ultimately affected the Post Office Act, the Customs Act, and most critically in today’s context, what is now Section 319 of the Criminal Code.
Only now that the true history of the last eighty years is finally coming to light, thanks to the free and open Internet, are we allowed to search for and see the original, unadulterated script that was so cleverly designed by the NWO forces of the day and it turns out to be a program of diabolic, treacherous, political pragmatism designed to destroy democratic institutions and replace them with an atheistic, elitist, macabre vision of a New World Order where they, and only they, would hold all the power and control over the world’s people along with all the resources of the planet.
It was back in the mid-1970s when the globalists began lobbying Ontario’s then Deputy Attorney General, F.W. Callaghan and putting pressure on him to silence one of their critics, a rather vociferous fellow by the name John Ross Taylor who had come up with the novel idea of leaving telephone messages on the phone lines of those who he was critical of. The recipients of Ross’s unwelcome expressions were demanding of the Federal Department of Justice the inclusion of speech-restricting legislation that removed the need for “willfulness” or fair comment based on public interest. In that way they could circumvent having to pay their own legal costs which would, under the new law, be off loaded on to the unsuspecting Canadian taxpayer instead.
According to the history of Section 13 by Marc Lemire, an advocate and fighter for freedom of speech during PM Harper’s reign, he states, “In 1976, the Federal Government was looking at a larger Act for employment issues and the provision of federally regulated services. This Act eventually would end up with the innocuous sounding name: the Canadian Human Rights Act. Although no other section of the CanadianHuman Rights Act covered speech, it was not a problem for the Federal government to capitulate and slip in an extra section to satisfy Ontario’s Attorney General’s lust to silence John Ross Taylor and his home-based answering machine.”
“In 1977Bill C-25 or the “Canadian Human Rights Act” was passed by the House of Commons on July 14th. Contained within it under the sub-title of “Hate messages” was Section 13 which read:
13(1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.
As Lemire goes on to state:
“Only a few years after the law was enacted, Mr. Callaghan finally got his wish and John Ross Taylor became its first victim, with the Canadian Human Rights Commission itself and several globalists as the complainants.
“Since the law was first enacted, two major changes were made to Section 13. These changes fundamentally shifted the original intent of the legislation, and turned Section 13 into an instrument to financially and morally punish those with politically incorrect views.
“The first change to the legislation occurred on May 15, 1998, when Royal Accent was given to Bill S-5 (1998), which added a new penalty provision to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Bill S-5 added Section 54 to the Canadian Human Rights Act, and allows the Human Rights Tribunal to impose a financial penalty of up to $10,000. On top of the fines, Section 54 also gave the fanatical Tribunal the ability to impose penalties of up to $20,000 as so-called ‘special compensation’.
“According to the background section of Bill S-5, these penalties were added ‘as a response to the rising incidence of hate crimes around the world. The government believes that stronger measures are needed to deter individuals and organizations from establishing hate lines. It hopes to accomplish this by allowing victims of such lines to apply for compensation and subjecting offenders to financial penalty.’
“The second change occurred in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001. Sadly, this legislation equated non-violent politically incorrect words – which are covered by Section 13 – with terrorism and concerns of national security. Under the guise of Bill C-36 – Canada’s Anti-Terrorism Act, Section 13 was expanded to cover “a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet.”
This change, gave the power to the Canadian Human Rights Commission to censor the internet and harass Canadians with views that the Rights Fanatics disagree with.
Closer to Home
Of itself censorship is nothing new having been around since Cicero’s day. It didn’t become established to any degree until after the middle of the 15th Century when Johannes Gutenberg invented the movable-type printing press and set off the Gutenberg revolution. Once the technical means were in place allowing mass communication to occur the inevitable pursuit of controlling the narrative also appeared and by the turn of the 20th Century the globalists of the day had already firmly established their worldwide news networks. They’re still with us today and the times we now live in are, in many ways, but a reflection of the effects that the controlled media has produced upon the planet over the past 125 years.
Having arrived on this 3rd rock from the sun in 1947 I was in a sense a Johnny-come-lately in terms of understanding how the mass media was structured even though by the time I left high school in 1965 Marshall McLuhan’s Gutenberg Galaxy had already been on the market for three years. My time spent at Simon Fraser University from its opening in the fall of ’65 until I left with my Teaching Certificate in hand was the precursor to what would eventually turn out to be a rather radical life spent within McLuhan’s famed galaxy.
I didn’t encountered the malevolent effects of censorship until I reached my 50th year. It was only then I finally realized that if a Canadian citizen wishes to express themselves in a free and open manner that the heavy hand of Big Brother can and will appear to silence you. My reaction at the time to having my letters to the editor of the local community newspaper the Quesnel–Cariboo Observer censored by my then employer School District #28 set me on a new path that would eventually lead up to the present moment and the issue now at hand.
Those who know me and my previous published works since I began publishing my own newspaper The Radical back in June of 1998 will understand perfectly well what I’m talking about when I state that ever since I first encountered head on the diabolic, Big Brother, Communist threat to individual freedom of expression back in 2007 the issue of CENSORSHIP has over shadowed my life’s work.
The legal consequences alone, after spending over a decade in and out of the Provincial and Supreme Court systems, have left an indelible mark on my ability to speak TRUTH to the power brokers who, since the onset of their transparently overt 2020 Covid attack upon humanity, have now turned the socio-political world into a farcical free-for-all with no holds barred.
Front Page News for November 23, 2012
Concluding Remarks
“Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.
And everyone that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, Shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and Beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.” ~ Jesus Christ, St. Matthew Ch. 7, vs 24 -27
The premise of my argument that Canada’s Legacy media or MSM is, and always has been, an integral part of the NWO’s overall plan to formulate and establish Orwellian laws inimical to the rights and freedoms of the Canadian people stands undefeated to this day for the simple reason that the globalists will never debate the issue in an open public forum as they’re fully aware it’s much easier to just use the power of their press to vilify and smear anyone who exhibits the testicular audacity to openly challenge their verifiable culpability in every criminal deception they’ve been involved in over the past century and longer. Frankly stated it’s the modus operandi of these globalists to react precisely in this fashion for that is how they mendaciously twist and stifle debate on any issue of national importance to Canadians, be it our Charter rights or our fundamental right (and responsibility as patriotic protectors of our country) to question the direction of the nation’s domestic and foreign policies.
It’s also my ardent contention that the Censorship template for Canada’s anti-free speech legislation, falsely labelled “Hate Propaganda” was, from the start, designed in such a way as to function as a legal shield which the globalists could then use to defend themselves against any allegations aimed at exposing their covert actions, all of which were designed to benefit their inordinate influence over Canadian politics.
Back during the period of my legal battles with the Canadian Human Rights Commission then Conservative PM Stephen Harper was the globalist’s Trojan Horse de jure and front man in this deliberate, ongoing, slow motion coup to capture the nation’s political and legal systems. His only saving grace was to have not stood in the way of repealed the Sec. 13 law before his tenure ended.
When we go back in history and retrace the steps these Machiavellian interlopers have taken since the end of World War 2 it’s clearly evident what they’ve been up to, especially in light of the now increasing displeasure that more and more Canadians are exhibiting toward the actions of the current Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when it comes to his relentless, mean-spirited attacks upon our truckers, our clergy and our nurses and doctors.
Those despicable actions, exacerbated to the nth degree by his psychotic obsession with wanting to jab every living soul in the country, from pregnant mothers and new born babies to the aged, with the World Health Organization and Fauci’s poisons that are now decimating the world’s populations everywhere make it abundantly evident that our nation is under serious attack by these foreign globalist insiders who are manipulating the Prime Minister of the country to commit treasonous acts designed to obliterate the people’s fundamental rights and freedoms.
These examples coupled with his outright phony posturing and endless display of abject obeisance to the wishes of international globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum of which he’s a charter member and one of the more fanatical and embarrassing examples of what a true Statesman ought not to be all point to the unequivocal conclusion that the nation has been betrayed by the Liberal Party of Canada and it MUST BE REPLACED in the most expedient manner as possible.
A final reminder for readers is Sec. 2b of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which clearly delineates our fundamental right to freedom of expression:
Sec.2b(2): Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press andother media of communication.
As fate would have it my own legal case was destined to be the test case for the globalists working in Canada. Should they win and find me guilty under Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada then that precedent would undoubtedly unleash a flood of subsequent attacks upon the rest of the bloggers and publishers and writers and artists living in Canada who might also see an imminent threat to their freedom of expression encapsulated in this draconian, Orwellian legislation designed with malicious forethought to censor truth and stymie any and all attempts to achieve and maintain justice and freedom of speech in Canada.
Just as the great parable of Jesus Christ shown above regarding the foolish man who built his house upon the sand has come down through history so too has the foolish attempt by those who labour for the Satanic forces to build a globalist house of invisible governance upon the sands of deception, usury and an insatiable lust for power and control over their fellow mortals.
Now that the rains of the peoples’ outrageous indignation and the floods of perceived injustice and repression of personal freedoms and the winds of Truth and Freedom are beginning to beat with greater and greater intensity upon the once mighty and powerful House of the New World Order (thanks to the miracle of the Internet), the underpinnings of this deceptive, age-old hoax are giving way and, if the people continue to unite and persevere in their staunch resistance to and abolition of all the censorious “Hate Propaganda” laws now being used against them, then soon and with great relief and thankfulness, will come the inevitable fall of this House of Horrors followed by a new beginning for those who want only peace and love and justice and brotherhood to reign supreme.
Tanya Gaw, founder of Action4Canada, gives an update after the court proceeding addressed the Motion to Strike set forth by the defendants named in Action4Canada’s Statement of Claim.
Action4Canada is a grassroots movement reaching out to millions of Canadians and UNITING our voices in opposition to the destructive policies tearing at the fabric of this nation. Through Call To ACTION campaigns, we equip citizens to take action. We are committed to protecting…FAITH, FAMILY and FREEDOM.
Thank you to everyone who attended in person at the BC Supreme Court in Vancouver. The court was filled to capacity (78 seats) plus there were another 50-70 people outside of the court room.
The court proceeding addressed the Motion to Strike set forth by the defendants named in Action4Canada’s Statement of Claim. Justice Alan Ross presided.
It was an amazing day in court watching Rocco Galati in action. Rocco was brilliant as he argued the merits of the case in opposition to the Motion to Strike.
Rocco pointed out that this is not a straightforward case such as a truck hitting a bicycle, but rather one of extreme complexity and huge public interest.
Rocco meticulously provided case law, both Canadian and International, to defend our position as well as facts supported by evidence, to counter the defense’s accusation that the case was founded on “conspiracy theories.” Mr. Galati advised Justice Ross that the case is not based on conspiracy theories but rather facts, and that he can provide the evidence proving that Bill Gates funds GAVI and the WHO; Bonnie Henry has ties to Bill Gates and the WHO; Teresa Tam is tied to the WHO; Justin Trudeau paid a billion dollars to Bill Gates; and many more important points.
The proceedings began at 10:00am PST and there were ‘seven’ lawyers representing the defendants.
Mr. Witten, the lead counsel for John Horgan, Bonnie Henry and the other provincial crown defendants, was the first to speak and provided a very weak submission. Mr. Witten provided no evidence to support his vague allegations and argument that the Statement of Claim was “replete with groundless conspiracy theories, deficient in substance, frivolous, convoluted, scandalous, irrelevant, costly, an embarrassment and an abuse of the court’s process.” Mr. Witten made further claims that the Notices of Liability were threatening and intimidating to those who received them and that the delivery of said documents was harassment.
Mr. Witten spoke for more than hour and covered several sections of the Statement of Claim (SOC) in great detail. It was impressive to hear the merits of the case being spoken by the defense and at times it became difficult to know if he was representing the defendants or the plaintiffs. As Mr. Witten read through the details of the Statement of Claim it only legitimized our position that the government has indeed violated the Constitutional rights of Canadians, caused irreparable harm and over-stepped their authority.
The lawyers representing the additional defendants named in the SOC provided their submissions and it was clear that they also had no argument or evidence to support their reasons for the Motion to Strike.
There was a break for lunch and upon returning to the court at 1:30pm PST Rocco began his response. As mentioned above it was nothing less than brilliant and something to behold.
Mr. Galati not only challenged Mr. Witten for referring to the case as a conspiracy theory but also for making the absurd statement that it would be too much work and too costly to proceed with this case. Mr. Galati called out the provincial governments and the Prime Minister for spending an accumulative 1.2 trillion dollars on COVID-19 measures and that by comparison, the cost for the case would be inconsequential.
Rocco brought to the attention of the court Mr. Witten’s lame and offensive efforts to discredit him by reporting that Rocco had 10 cases which were dismissed due to Motions to Strike, but conveniently failed to point out Rocco’s nearly 600 reported cases that were won. None of his wins were revealed by Witten. Rocco pointed these facts out to remind the court that previous wins and losses are irrelevant. The Case at hand is the only issue.
Mr. Witten further failed to mention the thousands of cases that Rocco has argued in his 34 year career and the many wins he has achieved. Justice Ross thanked Mr. Galati for the information and it rightfully elevated the level of respect due to Rocco.
In closing, Rocco stood on the merits of the case and that it is a matter of public interest and should not be dismissed. Rocco added, “the Constitution does not kneel, bend nor kiss the feet of public health officers, or any public officials, including the legislatures.”
There is so much more to report but these are some of the highlights. Live updates were posted during the proceedings.
The defense lawyers were then given the opportunity to reply but ZERO replied! None of them had a rebuttal! This is because they could not respond to Rocco’s correction of the defendant’s counsel’s embarrassing mis-statement and ignorance of Constitutional law and rights pleaded.
We now await Justice Ross’ decision which may take up to 30 days. We will make an announcement once the information is made available to us.
To access the Court docs visit the Legal Action Page.
Remember: Freedom of speech, thought, belief and the right to life, liberty and security of the person are guaranteed. We do not need to beg, barter or ask for them…they are ours for the taking.
Please consider becoming a monthly donor and helpAction4Canada continue to bring solutions and hope to the nation!
Lawyers and Medical Experts worldwide say they have all the evidence they need to convict WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill Gates and World Leaders of ‘Crimes against Humanity’
Legal proceedings have begun worldwide against various authorities, institutions and world leaders including the WHO, CDC, PHE, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and so on and so on, for committing Covid fraud, crimes against humanity and genocide, and every single lawyer and medical expert proceeding with the prosecutions say they have the evidence they need to ensure convictions.
Since July 2020 the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany has taken testimony from a large number of international scientists and experts.
The committee led by Attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, have since concluded the following –
The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
It is:
The biggest tort case ever
The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
Those responsible must be:
Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
Sued for civil damages
Deaths
There is no excess mortality in any country
Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
Autopsies showed:
Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
Almost all deaths were very old people
Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
• Health
Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
Tests:
Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
Illegality:
The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
Democracy is in danger of being replaced by Communist totalitarian models
Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
Conspiracy:
Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
There can be no talk of a second wave
Injury and damage:
Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
Anti-corona measures have:
Killed innumerable people
Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
Children are being taken away from their parents
Children are traumatized en masse
Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
Redress:
A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages.
These conclusions have been reached thanks to the testimony and evidence submitted by experts in every field of science to the committee which undeniably prove the Covid-19 pandemic is a planned criminal operation.
And it is thanks to these testimonies and submitted evidence that thousands of lawyers and medical professionals worldwide now have all the evidence they need to convict the World Health Organisation, the CDC, Public Health England, SAGE, and World leaders for Covid fraud, crimes against humanity and genocide.
One such court case has already been granted permission to proceed in the Supreme Court and will take place in Ontario, Canada. The official court proceeding document can be found here. This case would not have been granted if it was not for the mass evidence that has been gathered by Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his team on the Corona Investigative Committee.
The legal proceedings that have commenced in the Superior Court of Justice in Canada are against –
‘POPE FRANCIS, THE HOLY SEE, THE STATE OF THE VATICAN, THE SOCIETY OF JESUS, HM QUEEN ELIZABETH II, THE ORDER OF THE GARTER, THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR (FORMERLY SAXE COBOURG GOTHA), GLOBAL VACCINE ALLIANCE (GAVI), the UN’s WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION/PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATION OF CANADA, BILL AND MELINDA GATES FOUNDATION, PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU, DR. THERESA TAM, PREMIER DOUG FORD, CHRISTINE ELLIOTT, MAYOR JIM WATSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR ONTARIO’
This is of course just the beginning as many more legal proceedings are currently being requested to take place across the world.
[Editor’s Note: At no time in my tenure here on Planet Earth as a publisher, editor and journalist has the issue of Propaganda become more important than today. With the sudden onslaught in 2020 of the specious Covid -19 attack upon Humanity the wheels of this gigantic, psycho-technic juggernaut have increased to such an intensity that the average human being is now faced with such a staggering quantity of psychic/mental and visual data that their capacity to discern what is truth and what is falsehood (i.e. propaganda) is at a critical stage of being overwhelmed.
The expression “Information overload” has been with us since the 1960s but its application in the past tended to apply to specific instances but never has this relatively recent phenomenon assumed such a paramount, wide-spread degree of influence upon the general public as what we’re now witnessing with the plethora of information surrounding the Covid debate.
The year 1962 (here in Canada no less!) brought to the world Marshall McLuhan’s paradigm-breaking book “The Gutenberg Galaxy” followed by his next best-seller “Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man” in 1964 to be then topped off in 1967 with his and Quentin Fiore’s visual presentation “The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects.” All these books, plus other productions that sprang forth in response to them, changed the world in ways that most people still have yet to fathom. For the younger generations that followed any analysis of these thought-provoking texts has likely never occurred yet the effects of the new media which formed the basis of the texts can now be seen in the outward growth and expression of resistance and protest currently manifesting around the globe.
Part 1 of this series will analyze how the old media paradigm, aka the establishment media or the mainstream media (msm) or the corporate media, is presenting the Covid narrative to the world in what can only described as a fierce, fervent, unrelenting attempt to persuade the general public to acquiesce to the demands of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in as quick a manner as humanly possible.
Using mind-control techniques that were invented back in the first half of the 20th century – a period of our world history pock marked by two major world wars – the msm, in its pursuit of actualizing the One World Government agenda, continues to employ all of its ancient arsenal of weaponized language that proved effective in days gone by. The majority of the accompanying graphic images used to illustrate my thesis in Parts 2 & 3 will be, for some, both shocking and provocative. I make no apology for their use.
The Western world, throughout the 20th century and into the 21st (graphically reinforced by 911), has been continuously ruled by deception and false flag events, all of which, thanks to not being addressed and rectified earlier, have finally devolved into the global crisis that mankind is now facing. To understand it all (rather than to be overwhelmed to the point of being numbed and disabled by it and ultimately deceived into resigning oneself into a state of suspended apathy) is to see both sides of the narrative and to then judge via reason, logic, common sense and one’s intuitive heart-felt sense, what is Truth and what isn’t.
Part 1 will therefore focus on the mechanics of how immediate generations after WW2 were subjected to the same continuous assault upon their minds as what the adult populations were subjected to throughout the 1930s and 1940s when it came to the causes of the war and ultimately who was responsible for precipitating it.
Part 2 will focus on the role that the Canadian media performed during WW2. To illustrate the wartime propaganda I will be utilizing a number of graphic images taken from the Toronto Star Weekly’s Front Pages plus a commentary by the editor of the book STAR WEEKLY AT WAR Mr. Ian Verner Macdonald.
Part 3 will be, as Paul Harvey, former American radio broadcaster for ABC News Radio used to comment “the rest of the story”; the part the world in general has still not been fully appraised of even though many writers have produced the evidence to show what the Western media purposely has left out in order to meet their own sinister agenda.]
The Politics of Language:
Propaganda, Truth & Justice
A Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel Special 3-Part Series
By
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Quesnel Cariboo Sentinel
May 18th, 2021
“For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest; Neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad”. – Luke 8:17.
Part 1
One could hear the screams of Street Pastor Artur Pawlowski as the Calgary police manhandled him to the his knees on the pavement, forcing his arms to fold behind his back as they clamped their handcuffs around his wrists: “Nazis!”, “Gestapo!” he cried out as the traffic sped by along the freeway.
It was all too reminiscent of past days; days that stretch back through recorded history to the time when Jesus Christ and his Apostles were given similar and worse treatment by the powers of the Priesthood and Pagan Rome.
And for what did these injustices take place? Were these individuals thieves and murderers? Were they corrupt politicians who had sold out their country to alien forces? Were they traitors who, under cover of night, for silver or gold, raised the heavy oak timbers that held fast the security gates of their countrymen’s sanctuary allowing access to their enemies? No. They were simply God’s children working for their Heavenly Father in the Spirit of Love and Peace, labouring to awaken the slumbering masses and bringing tidings of great joy to their hungry hearts, minds and souls.
In the case of Pastor Artur Pawlowski we see once again Christianity itself epitomized in one individual, symbolizing the ever-recurring dilemma that faces those willing to speak Truth to power. But there is a missing factor in the majority of Christians today; one that was ever present when the Lord walked upon the desert sands in days of yore. That is the substance of this essay.
As the article title states, we are concerned about not only Truth and Justice but also the “politics of language” which, of necessity, requires immediate address and concerns not only the courageous, righteous Pastor Artur Pawlowski but anyone, be they Christian or otherwise, who is honestly concerned about the principles of Truth and Justice in a world now fraught with an inestimable preponderance of outright lies and massive deception; all of which emanate from the hidden force now controlling the major news sources around the world.
It must, of course, also be categorically emphasized from the start that this force manipulating the established media is one that didn’t just suddenly appear back in January of 2020 along with the advent of Covid-19. The facts, given proper exposure, will show that it has been with us now in its present form for at least the last 100 years and throughout that period has played a paramount role in manipulating and affecting every significant event that has occurred on the earthly stage. As preposterous as that might sound at first mention I must leave it as such and continue on with my stated thesis.
Recorded history, as we’ve come to know it throughout the 20th Century and now in the nascent beginnings of the 21 Century, is for the most part a fabricated, manufactured, illusionary reality. Yet, even though I assert such a viewpoint my arguments in favour of such a position don’t deny actual events that manifested in real life only the manner in which they have been interpreted for the masses and projected to them through highly contentious lenses; ones which the average person had absolutely no control over.
When I use the term ‘politics of language’ I’m speaking of how the controlled media furnishes its audience with weaponized language – be it single words, idiomatic expressions or phrases – which it then repeats again and again across all of its platforms, be they the print media (newspapers, magazines, books), the televised new media, tv generally, the Hollywood movie industry and the Internet. Whenever a single word or phrase is coined by those behind the media curtain it becomes promoted subliminally and overtly to the general public with such repetitive impact and power of persuasion that within a generation or two the masses of listeners and readers will by then have assimilated it into their minds and will begin regurgitating whatever mental morsels they’ve figuratively swallowed without ever realizing that it might have originally been a calculated, fabricated lie dispensed for purely propaganda purposes.
That, in essence, is what this writer sees occurring today when we witness good (or bad) people, be they Christian or otherwise, shouting out words loaded to the hilt with false meaning and connotation; words which, when heard by others, tend to automatically become associated with particular individuals or ethnic groups or nation states regardless of whether or not the meaning is correct.
This phenomenon of manipulating words, that began in earnest around the 20th century, might best be categorized (on an intellectual level at least) under a heading such as “Psycho-Linguistics” but on a deeper, more occult level, it borders on or actually finds its origins within that psychic sphere generally labeled the “black arts” under the sub-title “Sorcery.”
The godfather of these highly infused words or phrases is, undoubtedly the term “anti-semite” which came to prominence around the first two generations of the 20th century when the actions or deeds of a particular group (for various reasons), began to appear in newspapers and periodicals in Great Britain, the European Continent and North America. The group in question, being exceedingly small but at the same time also powerful beyond most people’s comprehension due to their financial position, began to counter the bad press they were starting to receive by colluding and using their “power of the purse” to start purchasing the very publishing houses and newspapers that were, in their estimation, committing the very foul deed which the group alleged was being perpetrated upon themselves. It was likely the first overt act on the part of any group or organization to change the thinking patterns of the general public. Some might even go so far as to suggest that it was the actual beginning of what we now tend to call the “Big Brother” news media as it was coined back in the late 1940s by British journalist and author George Orwell.
I’ll give readers one poignant example of the influential effect that this method of empowering words and expressions has had on the publishing industry, journalism in general, and global politics.
The following quote [edited for legal reasons. Ed.] comes from one of the 20th century’s great journalists and researchers the late Douglas Reed in a book that was completed in 1956 but didn’t see the light of day until after his death in 1978:
“A private organization which can produce such results [i.e, weaponize a term. Ed.] is obviously powerful; there is nothing comparable in the world. Mr. Vincent Sheehan wrote in 1949, “There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the [censored. Ed.] high command is immediately labelled as anti-semitic”. . . [Again, recent events in the Middle East prove the validity & the poignancy of Sheehan’s words.A.T.]
“How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to [censored. Ed.]? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for [censored. Ed.], or to be herded on to[censored. Ed.] platforms to receive “plaques” for services rendered?
“The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a “good” or a “bad” press. [emphasis added. Ed.] This is in fact control of “the mob”. In today’s language it is “the technique of propaganda and the approach to the masses”, as [censored. Ed.] said, but it is an ancient, Asiatic art and was described, on a famous occasion, by Saint Matthew and Saint Mark: “The chief priests and elders persuaded the multitude . . . The chief priests moved the people . . .”
Let that suffice for the moment in terms of spotlighting the issue at hand. I’ll now cut to the chase and identify the currently abused terms and explain why they were concocted in the first place and what the real intent of their misuse was meant to create in the minds of those still being indoctrinated with these false terminologies.
The second weaponized word or term that’s been manipulated by the Big Brother controlled media since its early prominence in the 1930’s, is the offensive pejorative epithet “Nazi”; a word that was intentionally attached not only to the National Socialist German Worker’s Party of Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich but, by extension and through extrapolation, to the German people generally as an ethnic group.
This is one of the primary politicized terms which Pastor Artur Pawlowski tends to employ whenever he wishes to describe those who are trying to shut down his church services and control his life’s work. The misuse or misapplication of this derogatory sobriquet to describe the Calgary police is therefore only apparent to those who know the real history of the 20th century and who have, through self-effort, been able to debrief themselves of the conditioning they were subjected to throughout their lifetime. Of course it must also be understood that Pastor Pawlowski is not the only person who has fallen prey to the sorcerer’s spell. Most people have, myself included.
My own life experience is a good example of what I’m talking about. I, like the bulk of Canadians born and raised in Canada, was ingrained with the negative connotations connected with the term “Nazi” from the time I first began reading comic books around the mid-1950s. War comics were the rage during WW2 and running through the 1940’s and 50’s and into the 60’s mainly. They were also one of the predominant methods by which the hidden force behind the publishing industry was able to permeate and impress up the young minds of future generations the subliminal message that Adolf Hitler was the most evil person on the planet and that the “Nazis” were the acme of blood-thirsty, violent, sadistic savagery, to be hated and avoided at all costs. While this might at first sound like I’m stretching it a bit one only need note that even today many of Canada’s mainstream newspapers ( the National Post being the best example), rarely issue an edition that doesn’t somewhere include the term “Nazi” or “neo-Nazi” or some other similar disparaging term such as “holocaust denier” or “hate monger” or “white supremacist” or “racist”: terms that that the mind automatically associates with Germany in one way or another.
This mindset continued well into my adult life, extending into the period when I began publishing my own newspaper back in June of 1998 at the age of 51. Two years later, it was still firmly entrenched in my subconscious mind and occasionally found expression within the pages of my monthly tabloid The Radical as illustrated below in the Front Page of the September, 1999 edition where I headlined an article “NATO NAZIS”.
Fortunately, for me, at one point an elderly German-Canadian reader who later became a subscriber to the paper, a person who had lived through the period of the 1930s and 1940s in National Socialist Germany was able to persuade me, through reason, common sense and example, that my views were not in keeping with the reality of the time period and was thus able to set me straight upon a path that eventually corrected all the erroneous lies that I had assimilated throughout my lifetime. The truth set me free and opened my eyes so that I was able to then see the propaganda being presented to the public by the msm for what it really was.
